10/12/11 N.Y. St. Reg. PAS-41-11-00026-P
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following proposed rule:
Proposed Action:
Revision in rates for Village of Marathon.
Statutory authority:
Public Authorities Law, section 1005(5)
Subject:
Rates for the sale of power and energy.
Purpose:
To maintain the system's fiscal integrity; this increase in rates is not the result of a Authority rate increase to the Village.
Text of proposed rule:
VILLAGE OF MARATHON Proposed Monthly Rates
| Residential S.C.1 | Proposed1 Rates |
| Customer Charge | $6.00 |
| Non-Winter (May-October) |
| Energy Charge, per kWh | $.05896 |
| Winter (November-April) |
| Energy Charge, per kWh | |
| First 1,000 Kwh | $.05896 |
| Over 1,000 kWh only | $.07648 |
| Commercial S.C.2 | |
| Customer Charge | $8.00 |
| Non-Winter (May-October) |
| Energy Charge, per kWh | $.05228 |
| Winter (November-April) |
| Energy Charge, per kWh | $.07763 |
1 Purchased Power Adjustment reflected in proposed rates.
VILLAGE OF MARATHON Proposed Monthly Rates
| L. Commercial S.C.3 | Proposed1 Rates |
| Demand Charge, per kW | $6.50 |
| Energy Charge, per kWh | $.03156 |
| Security Lighting S.C.4 | |
| Facilities Charge, per Lamp | $5.87 |
| Energy Charge, kWh | $.01648 |
| Street Lights – Village S.C.5 | |
| Facilities Charge, per Lamp | $6.84 |
| Energy Charge, per kWh | $.00049 |
1 Purchased Power Adjustment reflected in proposed rates.
Text of proposed rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
Karen Delince, Corporate Secretary, Power Authority of the State of New York, 123 Main Street, 15M, White Plains, New York 10601, (914) 390-8085, email:
secretarys.office@nypa.govData, views or arguments may be submitted to:
Same as above.
Public comment will be received until:
45 days after publication of this notice.
Regulatory Impact Statement, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Rural Area Flexibility Analysis and Job Impact Statement
Statements and analyses are not submitted with this notice because the proposed rule is within the definition contained in section 102(2)(a)(ii) of the State Administrative Procedure Act.
