HLT-43-11-00018-P Reduction to Statewide Base Price
10/26/11 N.Y. St. Reg. HLT-43-11-00018-P
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XXXIII, ISSUE 43
October 26, 2011
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
NO HEARING(S) SCHEDULED
I.D No. HLT-43-11-00018-P
Reduction to Statewide Base Price
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following proposed rule:
Proposed Action:
Amendment of section 86-1.16 of Title 10 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
Public Health Law, section 2807-c(35)
Subject:
Reduction to Statewide Base Price.
Purpose:
Imposes a reduction to the statewide base price as an interim measure.
Text of proposed rule:
Section 86-1.16 of Subpart 86-1 of title 10 NYCRR is amended by adding a new subdivision (c), to read as follows:
(c) For the period effective July 1, 2011 through March 31, 2012, the statewide base price shall be adjusted such that total Medicaid payments are decreased by $24,200,000.
Text of proposed rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
Katherine Ceroalo, DOH, Bureau of House Counsel, Regulatory Affairs Unit, Room 2438, ESP, Tower Building, Albany, NY 12237, (518) 473-7488, email: regsqna@health.state.ny.us
Data, views or arguments may be submitted to:
Same as above.
Public comment will be received until:
45 days after publication of this notice.
This action was not under consideration at the time this agency's regulatory agenda was submitted.
Regulatory Impact Statement
Statutory Authority:
The requirement to implement a modernized Medicaid reimbursement system for hospital inpatient services based upon 2005 base year operating costs pursuant to regulations is set forth in section 35 of part B as added by Chapter 58 of the laws of 2009. Section 2807-c(35) of the Public Health Law states that the Commissioner has the authority to set emergency regulations for general hospital inpatient rates and such regulations shall include but not be limited to a case-mix neutral statewide base price. Such statewide base price will exclude certain items specified in the statute and any other factors as may be determined by the Commissioner.
Legislative Objectives:
The Legislature and Medicaid Redesign Team adopted a proposal to reduce unnecessary cesarean deliveries to promote quality care and reduce unnecessary expenditures. Due to industry concerns with the initial proposal it was determined that a more clinically sound method needs to be developed. To generate immediate savings, however, a reduction in the statewide base price is being implemented while an obstetrical workgroup develops a more clinically sound approach to meet Legislative objectives.
Needs and Benefits:
The proposed amendment appropriately implements the provisions of Public Health Law section 2807-c(35)(b)(xii), which authorizes the Commissioner to address the inappropriate use of cesarean deliveries. Cesarean deliveries are surgical procedures that inherently involve risks; however, elective cesarean deliveries increase the risks unnecessarily. Therefore, high rates of cesarean deliveries are increasingly viewed as indicative of quality of care issues.
Due to industry concerns with the initial proposal it was determined that a more clinically sound method needs to be developed. To generate immediate savings, however, this amendment, in concert with enacted statute, implements a statewide base price reduction of $24.2 million dollars ($12.1 million State share) to achieve the immediate savings target for the 2011/2012 SFY for unnecessary cesarean deliveries while the state undergoes consultation with affected stakeholders to develop a clinically sound approach to reducing inappropriate cesarean deliveries.
Costs:
Costs to State Government:
There are no additional costs to State government as a result of this amendment.
Costs of Local Government:
There will be no additional cost to local governments as a result of these amendments.
Costs to the Department of Health:
There will be no additional costs to the Department of Health as a result of this amendment.
Local Government Mandates:
The proposed amendments do not impose any new programs, services, duties or responsibilities upon any county, city, town, village, school district, fire district or other special district.
Paperwork:
There is no additional paperwork required of providers as a result of these amendments.
Duplication:
These regulations do not duplicate existing State and federal regulations.
Alternatives:
No significant alternatives are available at this time. In collaboration with the hospital industry, the State is in the process of developing a more clinically sound method to achieve this savings. Several methods were considered to implement this savings measure but it was determined that none of the options were clinically sound. There is no option to not act on this initiative since the Enacted Budget assumes savings that total $24.2 million.
Federal Standards:
This amendment does not exceed any minimum standards of the federal government for the same or similar subject areas.
Compliance Schedule:
Section 86-1.16 requires that the statewide base price be reduced by $24,200,000 for the period effective July 1, 2011 through March 31, 2012.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Effect on Small Business and Local Governments:
For the purpose of this regulatory flexibility analysis, small businesses were considered to be general hospitals with 100 or fewer full time equivalents. Based on recent financial and statistical data extracted from the Institutional Cost Report, seven hospitals were identified as employing fewer than 100 employees.
Health care providers subject to the provisions of this regulation under section 2807-c(35)(b)(xii) of the Public Health Law will see a minimal decrease in funding as a result of the reduction in the statewide base price.
This rule will have no direct effect on Local Governments.
Compliance Requirements:
No new reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements are being imposed as a result of these rules. Affected health care providers will bill Medicaid using procedure codes and ICD-9 codes approved by the American Medical Association, as is currently required.
The rule should have no direct effect on Local Governments.
Professional Services:
No new or additional professional services are required in order to comply with the proposed amendments.
Compliance Costs:
As a result of the new provision of 86-1.16, overall statewide aggregate hospital Medicaid revenues for hospital inpatient services will decrease in an amount corresponding to the total statewide base price reduction.
Economic and Technological Feasibility:
Small businesses will be able to comply with the economic and technological aspects of this rule. The proposed amendments are technologically feasible because it requires the use of existing technology. The overall economic impact to comply with the requirements of this regulation is expected to be minimal.
Minimizing Adverse Impact:
The proposed amendments reflect statutory intent and requirements.
Small Business and Local Government Participation:
Hospital associations participated in discussions and contributed comments through the State's Medicaid Redesign Team process regarding these changes.
Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
Effect on Rural Areas:
Rural areas are defined as counties with a population less than 200,000 and, for counties with a population greater than 200,000, includes towns with population densities of 150 persons or less per square mile. The following 43 counties have a population less than 200,000:
Allegany
Hamilton
Schenectady
Cattaraugus
Herkimer
Schoharie
Cayuga
Jefferson
Schuyler
Chautauqua
Lewis
Seneca
Chemung
Livingston
Steuben
Chenango
Madison
Sullivan
Clinton
Montgomery
Tioga
Columbia
Ontario
Tompkins
Cortland
Orleans
Ulster
Delaware
Oswego
Warren
Essex
Otsego
Washington
Franklin
Putnam
Wayne
Fulton
Rensselaer
Wyoming
Genesee
St. Lawrence
Yates
Greene
The following 9 counties have certain townships with population densities of 150 persons or less per square mile:
Albany
Erie
Oneida
Broome
Monroe
Onondaga
Dutchess
Niagara
Orange
Compliance Requirements:
No new reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements are being imposed as a result of this proposal.
Professional Services:
No new additional professional services are required in order for providers in rural areas to comply with the proposed amendments.
Compliance Costs:
No initial capital costs will be imposed as a result of this rule, nor is there an annual cost of compliance.
Minimizing Adverse Impact:
The proposed amendments reflect statutory intent and requirements.
Rural Area Participation:
This amendment is the result of ongoing discussions with industry associations as part of the Medicaid Redesign team process. These associations include members from rural areas. As well, the Medicaid Redesign Team held multiple regional hearings and solicited ideas through a public process.
Job Impact Statement
A Job Impact Statement is not required pursuant to Section 201-a(2)(a) of the State Administrative Procedure Act. It is apparent, from the nature and purpose of the proposed rules, that they will not have a substantial adverse impact on jobs or employment opportunities. The proposed regulations revise the final statewide base price for the period beginning July 1, 2011 through March 31, 2012. The proposed regulations have no implications for job opportunities.