Home » 2013 Issues » October 09, 2013 » ASA-41-13-00005-E Establishment, Incorporation and Certification of Providers of Substance Use Disorder Services
ASA-41-13-00005-E Establishment, Incorporation and Certification of Providers of Substance Use Disorder Services
10/9/13 N.Y. St. Reg. ASA-41-13-00005-E
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XXXV, ISSUE 41
October 09, 2013
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
OFFICE OF ALCOHOLISM AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES
EMERGENCY RULE MAKING
I.D No. ASA-41-13-00005-E
Filing No. 942
Filing Date. Sept. 23, 2013
Effective Date. Sept. 25, 2013
Establishment, Incorporation and Certification of Providers of Substance Use Disorder Services
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
Action taken:
Repeal of Part 810; and addition of new Part 810 to Title 14 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
Mental Hygiene Law, sections 19.09(b), 19.20, 19.20-a, 19.40 and 32.02; Executive Law, section 296(15) and (16); Corrections Law, art. 23-A; Civil Service Law, section 50; and Protection of People with Special Needs Act, L. 2012, ch. 501
Finding of necessity for emergency rule:
Preservation of public health, public safety and general welfare.
Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity:
The immediate adoption of these amendments is necessary for the preservation of the health, safety, and welfare of individuals receiving services.
In December, 2012 Governor Andrew Cuomo signed the Protection of People with Special Needs Act (PPSNA; chapter 501 of the Laws of 2012); the statute created the Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs (Justice Center) establishing various protections for vulnerable persons, i.e., a new system for incident management in services operated or certified by OASAS; and new requirements for pre-employment background checks in OASAS certified and operated service providers, persons credentialed by the Office, and applicants for new operating certificates.
The amendments to Part 810, effective June 30, 2013 and subsequently September 25, 2013, are necessary to implement the criminal history background check provisions as this is a new process for OASAS. Additionally, by statute (Mental Hygiene Law sections 19.20 and 19.20-a) requires OASAS, rather than the Justice Center, to conduct reviews of criminal history information and to make recommendations regarding hiring, credentialing and certification.
The promulgation of these regulations is essential to preserve the health, safety and welfare of individuals receiving services within the OASAS treatment system. If OASAS did not promulgate regulations on an emergency basis, the process for OASAS to conduct ct this new process would not be implemented or would be implemented ineffectively. Further, protections for individuals receiving services would be threatened by insufficient safeguards regarding entities receiving operating certificates from the Office.
OASAS was not able to use the regular rulemaking process established by the State Administrative Procedure Act because there was not sufficient time to develop and promulgate regulations within the necessary timeframes.
Subject:
Establishment, Incorporation and Certification of Providers of Substance Use Disorder Services.
Purpose:
To enhance protections for service recipients in the OASAS system.
Substance of emergency rule:
The Proposed Rule would Repeal the current Part 810 and Replace it with a new Part 810 titled “Establishment, Incorporation and Certification of Providers of Substance Use Disorder Services.” The new Part incorporates amendments to the Office’s certification and review process consistent with statutory requirements, definitions and procedures of the Justice Center, pursuant to the Protection of People with Special Needs Act (Chapter 501 of the Laws of 2012); adds a new requirement that a majority of owners or principals of an applicant must have demonstrated prior experience in substance use disorder services, and that they shall require a criminal history information review prior to any final agency decision regarding certification or re-certification.
The Proposed Rule also makes technical amendments to standardize formatting and language usage for all Office regulations.
Amendments include:
Section 810.1 sets forth the background and intent and updates language referencing “substance use disorder”; removes language no longer applicable which was required to “grandfather” programs certified pursuant to prior regulations.
§ 810.2 sets forth the statutory authority for the promulgation of the rule by the Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services (“Office”); adds The Protection of People with Special Needs Act and statutes relating to required Criminal History Information reviews for all applicants for certification.
810.4 adds new definitions or amends language to be consistent with the Justice Center: “criminal history information review”, updates usage.
§ 810.7 requires a majority of applicants for certification or renewal to have demonstrated prior experience in substance use disorder treatment services; updates language related to corporate structure.
§ 810.8 amends requirements for the full review process of an application for certification to include required criminal history information review as a criteria for Office consideration whether or not to issue or renew and operating certificate; eliminates the “interim operating certificate” as it is not used; consolidates language related to due process for applicants denied certification.
§ 810.9 amends requirements for the administrative review process of an application for certification to include required criminal history information review as a criteria for Office consideration whether or not to issue or renew and operating certificate; eliminates the “interim operating certificate” as it is not used; consolidates language related to due process for applicants denied certification.
§ 810.10 adds requirements for Office prior approval of any changes in programming or corporate structure post certification, including any reduction in the majority of owners or principals with prior substance use disorder treatment experience.
§ 810.11 consolidates language requiring cooperative review of any programs requiring review by both the Office and the Department of Health.
§ 810.12 strengthens Office control of management contracts entered into by providers of services; requires administrators of contractors to complete a criminal history information review; retains in the governing authority to authority to remove any custodian regardless of change in employment status.
§ 810.13 updates language related to the different levels of certification of substance use disorder services.
810.14 adds requirement that staff credentials and employee or contractor compliance with the criminal history information review requirements are part of the inspection and review process for re-certification.
§ 810.16 consolidates language related to voluntary termination of authorized services.
§ 810.18 removes provisions for waiver; adds severability language.
A copy of the full text of the regulatory proposal is available on the OASAS website at: http://www.oasas.ny.gov/regs/index.cfm
This notice is intended
to serve only as a notice of emergency adoption. This agency intends to adopt this emergency rule as a permanent rule and will publish a notice of proposed rule making in the State Register at some future date. The emergency rule will expire December 21, 2013.
Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
Sara Osborne, Senior Attorney, NYS Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Svcs. (OASAS), 1450 Western Ave., Albany, NY 12203, (518) 485-2317, email: Sara.Osborne@oasas.ny.gov
Regulatory Impact Statement
1. Statutory Authority:
(a) Protection of People with Special Needs Act, Chapter 501 of the Laws of 2012, which added Article 20 to the Executive Law and Article 11 to the Social Services Law as well as amended other laws.
(b) Section 19.09(b) of the Mental Hygiene Law authorizes the Commissioner to adopt regulations necessary and proper to implement any matter under his or her jurisdiction.
(c) Section 19.20 of the MHL authorizes the Office to receive and review criminal history information related to employees or volunteers of treatment facilities certified, licensed, funded or operated by the Office.
(d) Section 19.20-a of the MHL authorizes the Office to receive and review criminal history information related to persons seeking to be credentialed by the Office or applicants for an operating certificate issued by the Office.
(e) Section 19.40 of the Mental Hygiene Law authorizes the Commissioner to issue operating certificates for the provision of chemical dependence services.
(f) Subdivisions (15) and (16) of Section 296 of the Executive Law identify unlawful discriminatory practices with regard to the employment and the issuance of licenses.
(g) Civil Service Law § 50 authorizes the Department of Civil Service to request criminal history checks for applicants for state employment.
(h) Article 23-A of the Corrections Law provides the factors to be considered concerning a person’s previous criminal convictions in making a determination regarding employment and the issuance of a license.
2. Legislative Objectives:
The legislative objectives are the establishment of comprehensive protections for vulnerable persons against abuse, neglect and other harmful conduct. The Act created a Justice Center with responsibilities for effective incident reporting and investigation systems, fair disciplinary processes, informed and appropriate staff hiring procedures, and strengthened monitoring and oversight systems.
The Justice Center operates a 24/7 hotline for reporting allegations of abuse, neglect and significant incidents in accordance with Chapter 501’s provisions for uniform definitions, mandatory reporting and minimum standards for incident management programs. Working in collaboration with the relevant state oversight agencies, the Justice Center is charged with developing and delivering appropriate training for caregivers, their supervisors and investigators.
A vulnerable persons’ central register contains the names of individuals found to have committed substantiated acts of abuse or neglect using a preponderance of evidence standard. All persons found to have committed such acts have the right to a hearing before an administrative law judge to challenge those findings Persons having committed egregious or repeated acts of abuse or neglect are prohibited from future employment caring for vulnerable persons, and may be subject to criminal prosecution. Less serious acts of misconduct are subject to progressive discipline and retraining. Applicants with criminal records who seek employment serving vulnerable persons will be individually evaluated as to suitability for such positions.
3. Needs and Benefits:
OASAS is proposing to adopt the following regulation because The Protection of People with Special Needs Act (Chapter 501 of the Laws of 2012) requires that criminal history information reviews be conducted on each prospective treatment provider, operator, employee, contractor, or volunteer of treatment facilities certified by the NYS Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services (“OASAS” or “Office”) who will have the potential for, or may be permitted, regular and substantial unsupervised or unrestricted physical contact with the clients in such treatment facilities and any individual seeking to be credentialed by the Office.
This legislation adds a new requirement that a majority of owners or principals of a provider demonstrate prior experience in substance use disorder treatment and also requires principals or applicants for certification to comply with requirements for a criminal history information review. The legislation is intended to enable providers of services to persons seeking treatment for substance use disorders to secure appropriate and properly trained individuals who own and operate OASAS facilities and programs, by verifying criminal history information received for individuals to operate such programs.
The legislation also makes technical amendments to make language and format consistent throughout OASAS regulations.
4. Costs:
The Office anticipates no fiscal impact on providers or local governments, job creation or loss.
5. Paperwork:
The proposed regulation will require some additional information to be reported to the agency by applicants for certification. To the extent feasible, such reporting shall be made electronically to avoid unnecessary paperwork costs.
6. Local Government Mandates:
To the extent local governments already conduct criminal history information reviews on municipal employees, there are no new local government mandates if a local government was to apply for certification.
7. Duplications:
This proposed rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any State or federal statute or rule.
8. Alternatives:
The Protection of People with Special Needs Act (Chapter 501 of the Laws of 2012) requires the adoption of this proposed regulation.
9. Federal Standards:
These amendments do not conflict with federal standards.
10. Compliance Schedule:
The regulations will be effective on June 30, 2013 and subsequently September 25, 2013 to ensure compliance with Chapter 501 of the Laws of 2012.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
1. Effect of the rule:
OASAS services are provided by programs of varying size in every county in New York State; some counties are also certified service providers. The proposed Rule has been reviewed by OASAS in consideration of its impact on applications for service providers of all sizes and on local governments; additionally this regulation has been reviewed by the OASAS Advisory Council which consists of providers and stakeholders of all sizes and municipalities.
2. Compliance requirements:
The proposed Rule requires persons who apply to the Office for certification to operate a treatment program to comply with the requirements of The Protection of People with Special Needs Act (Chapter 501 of the Laws of 2012) and complete a criminal history information review prior to certification.
3. Professional services:
The Office will retain documentation of such applicant review; this will not be an additional recordkeeping requirement for applicants or the Office. Every region of the state has resources for gathering fingerprints, the history information collection is done electronically from a central state or federal database, and communicated electronically, so any additional recordkeeping will be minimal regardless of geographic location. No new professional services are required; no professional services will be lost.
4. Compliance costs:
Because every region of the state has resources for gathering fingerprints, and the history information collection is done electronically from a central state or federal database, individual or municipal applicants will not be affected in any way. Many municipalities already conduct criminal history information reviews on prospective employees.
5. Economic and technological feasibility:
Implementation of the rule will require computer and email capability; all applicants in all regions of the state, both private and public sector, have such capability. No upgrades of hardware or software will be required. Also because every region of the state has resources for gathering fingerprints, and the history information collection is done electronically from a central state or federal database, and increasingly communicated electronically any additional recordkeeping will be minimal regardless of geographic location.
6. Minimizing adverse impact:
The application of the rule will not impose additional costs or operating requirements on applicants, local governments or small businesses; therefore, it is designed on its face to minimize adverse impact.
7. Small business and local government participation:
The proposed rule is posted on the agency website; agency review process involves input from trade organizations representing providers in both public and private sectors, of all sizes and in diverse geographic locations. The Office has prepared webinars and guidance documents for applicant use and for training agency administration.
Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
1. Rural areas in which the rule will apply (types and estimated number of rural areas):
OASAS services are provided in every county in New York State. 44 counties have a population less than 200,000: Allegany, Cattaraugus, Cayuga, Chautauqua, Chemung, Chenango, Clinton, Columbia, Cortland, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Genesee, Greene, Hamilton, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Livingston, Madison, Montgomery, Ontario, Orleans, Oswego, Otsego, Putnam, Rensselaer, St. Lawrence, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben, Sullivan, Tioga, Tompkins, Ulster, Warren, Washington, Wayne, Wyoming and Yates. 9 counties with certain townships have a population density of 150 persons or less per square mile: Albany, Broome, Dutchess, Erie, Monroe, Niagara, Oneida, Onondaga and Orange.
2. Reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance requirements; and professional services:
The proposed Rule requires persons who apply to the Office for certification to operate a treatment program to comply with the requirements of The Protection of People with Special Needs Act (Chapter 501 of the Laws of 2012) and complete a criminal history information review prior to certification, credentialing or hiring.
The Office will retain documentation of such review; this will not be an additional recordkeeping requirement for applicants or the Office. Every region of the state has resources for gathering fingerprints, the history information collection is done electronically from a central state or federal database, and communicated electronically, so any additional recordkeeping will be minimal regardless of geographic location. No new professional services are required; no professional services will be lost.
3. Costs:
No additional costs will be incurred for implementation by providers because no additional capital investment, personnel or equipment is needed and the Office and applicants are involved, not programs. Applicants will pay for their own processing regardless of geographic.
4. Minimizing adverse impact:
The application of the rule will not impose additional costs or operating requirements on providers in rural areas; therefore, it is designed on its face to minimize adverse impact.
5. Rural area participation:
The proposed rule is posted on the agency website; agency review process involves input from trade organizations representing providers in diverse geographic locations. The Office has prepared webinars and guidance documents for provider use and for training of agency administration.
Job Impact Statement
OASAS is not submitting a Job Impact Statement for these amendments because OASAS does not anticipate a substantial adverse impact on jobs and employment opportunities.
The proposed regulation requires persons who apply to the Office for certification to operate a treatment program, or persons who are principals or operators of an entity applying for certification, to comply with the requirements of The Protection of People with Special Needs Act (Chapter 501 of the Laws of 2012) and complete a criminal history information review prior to certification. Operating certificates are also issued contingent on compliance with other laws and regulations, including those promulgated by the Justice Center.
The proposed regulation has been presented to the OASAS Advisory Council consisting of providers and other stakeholders from a range of corporate types and municipalities. It is not anticipated that this regulation will have an adverse impact on existing jobs or the development of new employment opportunities for New York residents. It is anticipated that the proposed regulation will not have an adverse impact on existing employees in the field of fingerprinting or history review. The proposed regulations should not impact the number of criminal history information reviews requested via federal and state existing database. The Office is unable to determine what affect the proposed regulation may have on the employment of independent fingerprinting services or Office employees in the future.
The proposed regulation does not have an adverse impact on jobs or employment opportunities anywhere in the State, therefore, no region is disproportionately affected by the proposed regulation. This regulation will not require additional professional staff in existing certified providers; although entities will be required to maintain some records related to staff background, these should be minimal because much of the record exchange will be accomplished electronically.
The proposed regulation will have no adverse impact on existing jobs or the development of new employment opportunities. It is not anticipated that the proposed rule will affect the number of persons or entities applying for certification as operators of treatment service providers.
