ASA-50-08-00020-E Detoxification of Substances and Stabilization Services
12/10/08 N.Y. St. Reg. ASA-50-08-00020-E
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XXX, ISSUE 50
December 10, 2008
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
OFFICE OF ALCOHOLISM AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES
EMERGENCY RULE MAKING
I.D No. ASA-50-08-00020-E
Filing No. 1177
Filing Date. Nov. 25, 2008
Effective Date. Dec. 01, 2008
Detoxification of Substances and Stabilization Services
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
Action taken:
Repeal of Part 816 and addition of new Part 816 to Title 21 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
Mental Hygiene Law, sections 19.09, 19.15, 19.40, 21.09 and 23.02
Finding of necessity for emergency rule:
Preservation of public health, public safety and general welfare.
Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity:
If the regulation is not in place on December 1, 2008 two results will occur: 1) OASAS will not be in compliance with Public Health Law section 2708 c, and 2) upon CMS approval of the rates Department of Health will implement.
Subject:
Detoxification of substances and stabilization services.
Purpose:
To repeal and then add Part 816 services that are in alignment with NYS Statutory language in the 2008-2009 Article 7 bill.
Substance of emergency rule:
Amendment of Part 816 of Title 14 of the New York Codes, Rules and Regulations (Chemical Dependence Crisis Services) is proposed to allow for implementation of Chapter 58 of the Laws of 2008, Part C, § 14-b, which added language to Section 2807-c of the Public Health Law changing rates from a Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) system to a per diem system.
The amendment adds definitions in section 816.5 for Detoxification, Medically Managed Withdrawal Services, Medically Supervised Withdrawal services-Inpatient, Medically Supervised Withdrawal Services-Outpatient, Medically Monitored, Observation Bed, Prescribing Professional, Program Sponsor, Recovery Care Plan, and updates Qualified Health Professionals to include Licensed Mental Health Counselors, in order to effectively integrate operation of the proposed regulation.
The proposed regulations updates section 816.7 (Standards applicable to medically managed withdrawal and stabilization services) defining inpatient services that can be offered by providers in this service. The proposed regulation establishes that providers of medically managed services could also provide medically supervised services within the same setting with no change to their OASAS certification. The proposed regulation also defines the differences in the two services.
The proposed regulation was developed by OASAS staff and providers of withdrawal and stabilization services to allow for greater clinical flexibility; reduced paperwork requirements; increased patient-centered focus and a more targeted focus on crisis stabilization and linkage to treatment. Recommendations from the Detoxification Task Force convened by the Commissioner in the summer of 2007 included revising Part 816 regulations and "identify and modify, where appropriate the regulatory requirements that currently impede development of community-based medically supervised withdrawal programs". The proposed regulations have been revised to protect patient safety and quality of care while providing greater flexibility to the role of medical and clinical staff to exercise clinical judgment.
These changes are one means of encouraging communities to develop increased community-based withdrawal and stabilization programs to meet the overall goal of the Detoxification Task Force of reducing unnecessary hospital detoxifications and increasing access to community based care where safe and appropriate.
The proposed changes to Part 816 also update section 816.8 (Standards applicable to inpatient medically supervised withdrawal and stabilization services). The regulation changes the type of paperwork required and staffing configuration for outpatient settings. The proposed regulation provides a separate section, 816.9, applying to medically supervised outpatient withdrawal and stabilization services. Changes to the outpatient regulation allow for a face to face visit with a medical professional including a registered nurse and allow for the physician to schedule visits less than daily if deemed safe and appropriate. These changes address the biggest previous barrier to the provision of outpatient services: the need for daily physician contact.
The proposed regulation would reduce the amount of paperwork in both the inpatient and outpatient medically managed and medically supervised setting. The proposed regulation no longer requires vocational and education assessments, changes the language from biopsychosocial assessment to a crisis assessment targeting only the information necessary to safely stabilize the patient, engage them in a change process and link them to appropriate treatment services. The proposed regulation requires targeted assessments aimed at crisis stabilization and linkages, thereby allowing more time for counseling services and providing more time to engage the client in the recovery process.
The proposed regulation expands clinical flexibility by providing individualized treatment when a patient is interested in withdrawal and stabilization services. By triaging the patient a more efficient and cost effective level of care determination can be made, allowing for more individualized crisis assessment and stabilization.
The proposed Part 816 regulation supports implementation of the enacted 2008-2009 Health and Mental Hygiene Budget, which amended section 2807-c of the Public Health Law to: reconfigure reimbursement for hospital based medically managed withdrawal / detoxification; and authorize the reimbursement methodology for a 48 hour detoxification observation period.
Section 816.9, entitled medically monitored withdrawal and stabilization services, remains the same.
This notice is intended
to serve only as an emergency adoption, to be valid for 90 days or less. This rule expires February 22, 2009.
Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
Deborah Egel, Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services, 1450 Western Avenue, Albany, New York 12203, (518) 485-2312, email: DeborahEgel@oasas.state.ny.us
Regulatory Impact Statement
The proposed Chemical Dependence Withdrawal and Stabilization Services regulations are being submitted for public review and comment. The current Part 816 (Chemical Dependence Crisis Services) will be repealed and the proposed regulations will be added in order for OASAS to be in alignment with the enacted 2008-2009 Health and Mental Hygiene Budget. The 2008-09 Health and Mental Hygiene Budget amended section 2807-c of the Public Health Law to reconfigure reimbursement for hospital based medically managed withdrawal/detoxification and authorize the reimbursement methodology for a 48 hour detoxification observation period, which has an effective date of December 1, 2008.
Chemical dependence is a chronic illness which can be treated effectively when medications are administered under conditions consistent with their pharmacological efficacy, and when withdrawal and stabilization services include necessary supportive services such as psychosocial counseling, treatment for co-occurring disorders, and medical services as needed. Chemical dependence withdrawal and stabilization is the first step in facilitating recovery from addiction for many patients. The proposed regulations set forth standards to guide withdrawal services treatment.
1. Statutory Authority:
Section 19.07(e) of the Mental Hygiene Law authorizes the Commissioner of the Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services ("the Commissioner") to adopt standards including necessary rules and regulations pertaining to chemical dependence services.
Section 19.09(b) of the Mental Hygiene Law authorizes the Commissioner to adopt regulations necessary and proper to implement any matter under his or her jurisdiction.
Section 19.21 (b) of the Mental Hygiene Law requires the Commissioner to establish and enforce certification, inspection, licensing and treatment standards for alcoholism, substance abuse, and chemical dependence facilities.
Section 19.21(d) of the Mental Hygiene Law requires the Commissioner to promulgate regulations which establish criteria to evaluate chemical dependence treatment effectiveness and to establish a procedure for reviewing and evaluating the performance of providers of services in a consistent and objective manner.
Section 32.01 of the Mental Hygiene Law authorizes the Commissioner to adopt any regulation reasonably necessary to implement and effectively exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred by Article 32.
Section 32.05 of the Mental Hygiene Law requires providers to obtain an operating certificate issued by the Commissioner in order to operate chemical dependence services.
Section 32.07(a) of the Mental Hygiene Law gives the Commissioner the power to adopt regulations to effectuate the provisions and purposes of Article 32.
The relevant sections of the Mental Hygiene Law cited above allow the Commissioner to regulate how chemical dependency services are administered. This regulation will alter the way those services are administered, providing greater flexibility within the State regulations and aligning the regulation with the statutory language of Chapter 58 of the Laws of 2008, Part C, § 14-b. The objective is to be aligned with the legislative intent behind the enactment of Sections 19, 22 and 32 of the Mental Hygiene Law, allowing the Commissioner to certify, inspect, license and establish treatment standards for all facilities that treat chemical dependency. Revising this regulation will establish a new standard for all facilities, which will assist withdrawal programs in providing better health care services and withdrawal from chemical dependence.
2. Legislative Objectives:
Chapter 558 of the Laws of 1999 requires the promulgation of rules and regulations to regulate and assure the consistent high quality of services provided within the State to persons suffering from chemical abuse or dependence, their families and significant others, as well as those who are at risk of becoming chemical abusers. The legislature enacted Section 19 of the Mental Hygiene Law, enabling the Commissioner to establish best practices for treating chemical dependency.
3. Needs and Benefits:
Detoxification is a medical intervention that manages an individual safely through the process of withdrawal (McCorry et. al. 2000). The three successful components of detoxification have been identified in the Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) #45 as evaluation, stabilization and linkage to treatment (CSAT, 2006). In addition, the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) recognizes that patients should be placed in the least restrictive setting that provides safe and effective treatment.
Under the proposed Part 816 regulations, hospital based detoxification units will be able to operate two levels of care simultaneously: medically managed and medically supervised. Medically managed services are designed for patients who are acutely ill from alcohol-related and/or substance-related addictions or dependence, including the need for medical management of persons with severe withdrawal or risk of severe withdrawal symptoms, and may include individuals with or at risk of acute physical or psychiatric co-morbid conditions. This level of care includes the 48 hour observation bed. Inpatient medically supervised withdrawal and stabilization services are appropriate for persons who are intoxicated by alcohol and/or substances, who are suffering from mild to moderate withdrawal, coupled with situational crisis, or who are unable to abstain with an absence of past withdrawal complications. Medically supervised services may require less staff due to the decreased medical needs of patients who are appropriate for this level of care.
The proposed regulations provide more clinical expertise in the management of patients, and will encourage the appropriate use of a broader array of withdrawal and stabilization services. Hospitals will be required to more thoroughly assess patients for appropriate level of care and community providers have been provided more flexibility in providing community-based care. This approach to detoxification has been supported by consensus opinion (CSAT, 2006)
This is supported by OASAS statistics. In 2007, 72,099 patients, representing 24% of all patients admitted in addiction treatment, entered hospital and community based withdrawal and stabilization services in New York State. Among the 2007 admissions to medically managed detoxification services, 10,029 patients, representing 19% of all patients, arrived at another level of care within 14 days of discharge. Among the 2007 admissions to medically supervised withdrawal, 8,265 patients, representing 40% of all patients, arrived at another level of care within 14 days of discharge.
The purpose of this regulatory change is to capitalize on better linkage and engagement to prevent multiple admissions without sustained recovery. Patients are more likely to enter and remain in subsequent substance abuse treatment if they believe that the services will help them with life problems (Fiorentine et. Al 1999). Better linkages to inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation have been found when case managers are able to directly link patients through a warm-hand-off or provide incentives. (Chutuape, et.al. 2001; CSAT 2006).
4. Costs:
Additional costs are expected to be minimal. Any costs incurred by providers or the State will be offset by better treatment outcomes and healthier patients, which will result in lower costs for medical and other services.
a. Costs to regulated parties:
There should be no additional outlay to regulated parties as a result of this regulation. The regulation changes the focus of withdrawal services from treatment to stabilization and discharge planning. The regulation is also necessary to support the enacted 2008-09 New York State Budget which:
• The current hospital detoxification reimbursement methodology will change from a DRG case payment to a per diem methodology effective December 1, 2008 pending Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) approval.
• The transition to per diem rates, based on 100 percent on the prices (established with 2006 base year cost, trended to the rate year) will take place over a four year period.
• The Phase in period begins December 1, 2008, and will ultimately end in the complete transition from DRGs to the reweighted and rebased per diem rate:
o Effective December 1, 2008 thru December 31, 2009, the per diem rate will be based on 75 percent on the 2007 DRG rate converted to a per diem rate (trended to the rate year) and 25 percent on the regional prices (trended to the rate year).
o In 2010 the per diem rate will be evenly split between these two components.
o In 2011, the rate will be based 25 percent on the DRG rate (converted to a per diem and trended) and 75 percent regional prices trended).
o By 2012, the rate will be at 100 percent based on the regional prices.
Year One:
• All Part 816 hospital inpatient detoxification services: Observation period services; Medically Managed Detoxification; and Medically Supervised Inpatient Withdrawal Services, provided in an OASAS certified Part 816 bed will receive the same, hospital specific amount.
Years Two through Four:
• The Part 816 Hospital Based Observation Period and Medically Managed Detoxification (MMD) Services will be reimbursed at the same amount. The Part 816 Hospital Based Medically Supervised Inpatient Withdrawal Period will be reimbursed at 75 percent of the prevailing hospital specific MMD rate in 2010.
b. Costs to the agency, state and local governments:
OASAS is not expected to see increased costs related to administering the rule, although the agency will need to modify the program review instrument currently used to certify chemical dependence withdrawal services along with providing technical assistance.
Additionally, there is an anticipated cost saving with the regulation changing from a DRG to a per diem rate. DRGs are a system used to classify hospital cases into one of approximately 500 groups that are expected to have similar hospital resource use, developed for Medicare as part of the prospective payment system. DRGs are assigned by a "grouper" program based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnoses, procedures, age, sex, and the presence of complications or co morbidities. DRGs have been used since 1983 to determine how much Medicare pays a hospital, since patients within each category are similar clinically and are expected to use the same level of hospital resources.
Therefore, patients will treated within a system that is designed to appropriately place patients and move them from more intensive services into other levels of care that are more less expensive and effective in treating the patient resulting in savings for the State and local government.
5. Local Government Mandates:
There are no new mandates or administrative requirements placed on local governments.
6. Paperwork:
The proposed Part 816 regulations will decrease the amount of individual patient assessments and treatment plans, saving providers considerable time and effort. Assessments will be targeted for this distinct population. Time previously spent on vocation and educational assessments will be eliminated. Services will be focused on crisis intervention, stabilization and discharge planning. On average, 60 percent of counselors' time is currently spent filling in required paperwork, which will instead be dedicated to serving the patient population.
The proposed regulations also include changes to allow more flexibility by reducing paperwork, targeting interventions to crisis stabilization and linkages, which will allow clinicians more time for individual contact.
7. Duplications:
There is no duplication of other state or federal requirements.
8. Alternatives:
A Task Force was convened by the Commissioner in June 2007 to review and make recommendations on chemical dependence crisis services. The Task Force published recommendations in January 2008. To the extent possible the proposed Part 816 regulations reflect the Task Force recommendations. There were no alternatives considered.
OASAS elicited comments on the proposed regulations. The regulations were shared with New York's treatment provider community, representing a cross-section of upstate and downstate, as well as urban and rural programs. All comments received were reviewed and changes were made. Additionally, these proposed regulations were shared with the New York State Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Providers (ASAP).
Finally, the proposed regulations were shared with New York State's Advisory Council at the August meeting. At this meeting there were no comments generated by the group because the providers appeared to be comfortable with the current proposal.
9. Federal Standards:
Federal standards governing Medicaid requirements for these services are incorporated into the proposed changes to Part 816.
10. Compliance Schedule:
It is expected that full implementation of Part 816 will be completed by December 1, 2008 in order to be complaint with statutory language.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Flexibility Analysis for Small Businesses and Local Governments for 14 NYCRR Part 816.
Effect of the Rule: The proposed Part 816 will impact certified and/or funded providers. It is expected that the development of Crisis Withdrawal and Stabilization services will require providers to amend some of their policies and procedures. The new service will result in greater clinical flexibility; reduced paperwork requirements; increased patient-centered focus and a more targeted focus on crisis stabilization and linkage to treatment. These new services will result in better patient treatment outcomes. Local health care providers may see an increase in patients seeking crisis withdrawal and stabilization services due to less restrictive procedures. As a result of patients receiving these services, local governments may see a decrease in services associated with active illicit drug use such as arrests and emergency room visits. Also, local governments and districts will not be affected because any nominal increase in cost will be offset by better patient outcomes.
Compliance Requirements: There are some minor changes in compliance requirements. In addition, providers are already required to provide utilization review, therefore, it is not expected that the proposed regulation will have additional costs.
Professional Services: Additional professional services are not expected.
Compliance Costs: Some programs may need additional formally trained staff to meet the proposed requirements. Training will be made available to hospital providers by OASAS and Island Peer Review Organization (IPRO), an independent, not-for-profit corporation which specializes in health care evaluation and quality improvement.
Economic and Technological Feasibility: Compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements of the proposed Part 816 is expected to have a nominal economic impact on small businesses and government.
Minimizing Adverse Impact: Part 816 has been carefully reviewed to ensure minimum adverse impact to providers by Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Providers of NYS, Inc., New York State's Council of Local Mental Hygiene Directors and the New York State Advisory Council on Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services, Greater New York Hospital Association, Healthcare Association of New York, and a statewide representative coalition from hospital and community based organizations that provide Withdrawal and Stabilization services. All comments received were reviewed and numerous changes were made. Any impact this rule may have on small businesses and the administration of State or local governments and agencies will either be a positive impact or have nominal costs. Compliance requirements are small and will be absorbed into the already existing economic structure. The positive impact for patients and the state health care system out weigh any potential minimal costs.
Small Business and Local Government Participation: The proposed regulations were shared with New York's treatment provider community including Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Providers of NYS, Inc., Greater New York Hospital Association, Healthcare Association of New York, the Council of Local Mental Hygiene Directors and the New York State Advisory Council on Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services and a statewide representative coalition from hospital and community based organizations that provide Withdrawal and Stabilization services.
Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
1. Types and estimated number of rural areas: There are six (6) certified providers of medically managed detoxification services that are located in rural areas of the State, five of which are public.
2. Reporting: There will be new documentation requirements to maintain clients in the higher level of care that will have some impact on providers.
3. Costs: There will be minimum impact for rural providers to implement Part 816. Under the Proposed 816 hospital based units can now operate two levels of care simultaneously: medically managed and medically supervised. Medically supervised services may require less staffing.
4. Minimizing adverse impact: Regulatory reform of detoxification rates was driven by language in the enacted 2008-09 budget. In order to achieve optimal results, OASAS solicited input from over 40 providers of service representing each modality statewide. This group met for a period of six months and the hospitals agreed that it was important to align detoxification care with detoxification rates. Hospitals also realized this could increase opportunities for outpatient detoxification units with increased income.
5. Rural area participation: These amendments were shared with New York's treatment provider community and included a cross-section of upstate and downstate, as well as urban and rural programs.
Job Impact Statement
The implementation of Part 816 may have a minor impact on staffing at hospital based detoxification units. Hospital based units under the current Part 816 solely operate as medically managed units which requires more staffing than any other withdrawal service. Under the proposed Part 816, hospital based units can now operate two levels of care simultaneously; medically managed and medically supervised. Staffing for medically supervised services may require less staffing. This regulation will not adversely impact jobs outside of the few hospital based detoxification units.
