HLT-53-08-00007-P Service Intensity Weights (SIW) and Average Lengths of Stay

12/31/08 N.Y. St. Reg. HLT-53-08-00007-P

NEW YORK STATE REGISTER

VOLUME XXX, ISSUE 53

December 31, 2008

RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

PROPOSED RULE MAKING

NO HEARING(S) SCHEDULED

 

I.D No. HLT-53-08-00007-P

Service Intensity Weights (SIW) and Average Lengths of Stay

PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following proposed rule:

Proposed Action:

Amendment of section 86-1.62 of Title 10 NYCRR.

Statutory authority:

Public Health Law, section 2807-c(3)

Subject:

Service Intensity Weights (SIW) and Average Lengths of Stay.

Purpose:

Modifies the Service Intensity Weights (SIW) for DRGs.

Substance of proposed rule (Full text is posted at the following State website:www.health.state.ny.us):

86-1.62 - Service Intensity Weights and Group Average Arithmetic Inlier Lengths of Stay

The proposed amendments of section 86-1.62 of Title 10 (Health) NYCRR are intended to change the service intensity weights (SIWs) for the diagnosis related group (DRG) classification system for inpatient hospital services.

Effective January 1, 2008, the DRG classification system used in the hospital case payment system was updated to incorporate those changes made by Medicare for use in the prospective payment system, and additional changes to identify medically appropriate patterns of health resource use for services that are efficiently and economically provided. The SIWs were revised accordingly to reflect the costs of the redistributed cases.

In addition, the SIWs were updated to reflect 2004 costs and statistics reported to the Department for a representative sample of hospitals. This update ensures a reflection of more current clinical practices, advances in technology, changes in patient resource consumption, and changes in hospital length of stay patterns. The revised service intensity weights based on 2004 data are being phased-in over a three year period. The weights effective for the period January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008, were based on 75% of the service intensity weights in effect as of December 31, 2007 based on 1992 data, and 25% of the service intensity weights based on 2004 data. The service intensity weights effective for the period January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, will be based on 33% of the service intensity weights in effect as of December 31, 2007 that are based on 1992 data, and 67% of the service intensity weights based on 2004 data. Effective January 1, 2010 and thereafter, the service intensity weights will be based on 2004 data. Effective January 1, 2009, the service intensity weights are being revised to reflect the phase-in described above.

General Summary for 86-1.62

The changes in the service intensity weights for the DRG classification system described above (Section 86-1.62 of Title 10 (Health) NYCRR) will enable providers to place patients in the most appropriate DRG and, therefore, they will receive adequate reimbursement for services provided. In the aggregate, these changes will have a budget-neutral impact on the reimbursement system.

The Department is statutorily required to update the grouper to be consistent with changes made to the DRG classification system used by the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) and to modify existing and add new DRGs to more accurately reflect patterns of health resource use.

Text of proposed rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:

Katherine Ceroalo, DOH, Bureau of House Counsel, Regulatory Affairs Unit, Room 2438, ESP, Tower Building, Albany, NY 12237, [phone], email: [e-mail]

Data, views or arguments may be submitted to:

Same as above.

Public comment will be received until:

45 days after publication of this notice.

Regulatory Impact Statement

Statutory Authority:

The authority for the subject regulations is contained in sections 2803(2), and 2807(3) and 2807(4) of the Public Health Law (PHL), which require the State Hospital Review and Planning Council (SHRPC), subject to the approval of the Commissioner, to adopt and amend rules and regulations for hospital reimbursement rates that are reasonable and adequate to meet the costs that must be incurred by efficiently and economically operated facilities. PHL section 2807-c(3) authorizes the SHRPC to adopt rules subject to the Commissioner's approval, to adjust the service intensity weights (SIWs) for the diagnosis related groups (DRGs). Sections 34, 34-a and 34-b, of Part C of Chapter 58 of the Laws of 2007 authorizes the SHRPC and the Commissioner to update the cost and statistical base used to determine the SIWs to calendar year 2004 data and to provide for a phase-in of the new weights. PHL section 2807-c (4) authorizes the SHRPC to adopt rules, subject to the Commissioner's approval, for exceptions to case based payments for cost outliers.

Legislative Objectives:

The Legislature sought to have the DRGs used in the hospital reimbursement methodology be consistent with those used in Medicare reimbursement and reflect medically appropriate, efficient and economic patterns of health resource use and services.

Needs and Benefits:

The proposed amendments to sections 86-1.62 of Title 10 (Health) NYCRR are intended to make current regulations consistent with changes made to the service intensity weights (SIWs) for the diagnosis related group (DRG) classification system used by the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS). The SIWs are an integral part of the hospital Medicaid and like payor inpatient rates. The Department makes changes to the grouper used to assign inpatient cases to the appropriate DRG. As part of this process, the Department may make modifications, revisions and create new DRGs that reflect the current resources consumed by inpatients. After the grouper is modified, the SIWs must be recalculated to be consistent with the newly created and updated list of DRGs, and to incorporate the 2004 cost and statistical basis, thus creating new values for the SIWs in sections 86-1.62. Lastly, the amendment provides payors of inpatient hospital services with the new values used to determine the correct case base payment for each DRG so hospital claims can be submitted and paid in a timely manner. This amendment incorporates the second year of the phase-in of the new service intensity weights.

COSTS:

Costs to State Government:

The amendment to 86-1.62 revising the SIWs has been legislated as budget neutral; therefore there is no additional cost to the State as a result of these regulation changes.

Costs of Local Government:

No increase or decrease in costs to local governments is anticipated as a result of these amendments.

Costs to Private Regulated Parties:

In the aggregate, there will be no increases or decreases in hospital revenues as a result of these amendments. Changes to the DRG classification system will cause a realignment of cases among the DRGs. Those cases that require more intensive provision of care will realize an increase in the SIW (and reimbursement) for that DRG. The removal of such cases from the DRG to which they were previously assigned will decrease the SIW (and reimbursement) for that DRG. Therefore, revenues will shift among individual hospitals depending upon the diagnosis of and procedures performed on the patients they treat. The extent of the shift in revenues cannot be determined because it will depend upon future patient services.

Costs to the Department of Health:

There will be no additional costs to the Department of Health as a result of these amendments.

Local Government Mandates:

This regulation affects the costs to counties and New York City for services provided to Medicaid beneficiaries as described above. It imposes no program, service, duty or other responsibility upon any county, city, town, village, school district, fire district or other special district.

Paperwork:

There is no additional paperwork required of providers as a result of these amendments.

Duplication:

These regulations do not duplicate existing State and Federal regulations.

Alternatives:

Based upon suggestions/recommendations received from hospital industry representatives, the Department has included adjustments that provide more appropriate recognition of the costs related to current clinical practices, new medical technologies, changes in patient resource consumption, and changes in hospital length of stay patterns. Two alternatives were considered for the means of adjusting the revised SIWs to ensure budget neutrality. The first alternative was to apply a neutrality adjustment in the calculation of the SIWs. However, since the SIWs are formulated on non-Medicare costs and the budget neutrality provision in statute applies to Medicaid expenditures, this approach was rejected. Instead, budget neutrality for Medicaid expenditures will be achieved by applying an adjustment to the Medicaid hospital inpatient rates.

Federal Standards:

The proposed rule does not exceed any minimum standards of the federal government for the same or similar subject areas.

Compliance Schedule:

The proposed rule establishes rates of payment as of January 1, 2009; there is no period of time necessary for regulated parties to achieve compliance.

Contact Person: Katherine Ceroalo

New York State Department of Health

Bureau of House Counsel, Regulatory Affairs Unit

Corning Tower Building, Rm. 2438

Empire State Plaza

Albany, New York 12237

[phone]

[phone] (FAX)

[e-mail]

Comments submitted to Department personnel other than this contact person may not be included in any assessment of public comment issued for this regulation.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Effect on Small Business and Local Governments:

For the purpose of this regulatory flexibility analysis, small businesses were considered to be general hospitals with 100 or fewer full time equivalents. Based on recent financial and statistical data extracted from the Institutional Cost Report, seven hospitals were identified as employing fewer than 100 employees.

Compliance Requirements:

No new reporting, record keeping or other compliance requirements are being imposed as a result of these rules.

Professional Services:

No new or additional professional services are required in order to comply with the proposed amendments

Economic and Technological Feasibility:

Small businesses will be able to comply with the economic and technological aspects of this rule. The proposed amendments are intended to make current regulations consistent with changes made to the service intensity weight for the DRG classification system used by the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS). The current SIWs are updated to be consistent with the proposed DRG modifications, and the cost and statistical base.

Compliance Costs:

No initial capital costs will be imposed as a result of this rule, nor will there be an annual cost of compliance. As a result of the amendment to 86-1.62 there will be no anticipated increases or decreases in hospitals' Medicaid revenues. However, revenues will shift among individual hospitals depending upon the diagnoses of and procedures performed on the patients they treat and the extent to which they would be classified into the modified diagnosis related groups.

Minimizing Adverse Impact:

The proposed amendments will be applied to all general hospitals. The Department of Health considered approaches specified in section 202-b (1) of the State Administrative Procedure Act in drafting the proposed amendments and rejected them as inappropriate given the reimbursement system mandated in statute.

Small Business and Local Government Participation:

Local governments and small businesses were given notice of these proposals by its inclusion in the agenda of the Fiscal Policy Committee of the State Hospital Review and Planning Council for its November 20, 2008 meeting. That agenda is mailed to general hospitals qualifying as small businesses, providers, members of the Fiscal Policy Committee, the New York State Legislature and representatives of the hospital associations, among others. The associations are member organizations that represent the interests and concerns of hospitals across New York State, including small businesses and local governments. This outreach resulted in the Department of Health receiving comments and suggestions related to additional changes that industry representatives recommended be implemented. Based on this feedback, the Department did make additional changes to the service intensity weights to incorporate several of these comments and suggestions.

Rural Area Flexibility Analysis

Effect on Rural Areas:

Rural areas are defined as counties with a population less than 200,000 and, for counties with a population greater than 200,000, includes towns with population densities of 150 persons or less per square mile. The following 44 counties have a population less than 200,000:

Allegany	Hamilton	Schenectady
Cattaraugus	Herkimer	Schoharie
Cayuga	Jefferson	Schuyler
Chautauqua	Lewis	Seneca
Chemung	Livingston	Steuben
Chenango	Madison	Sullivan
Clinton	Montgomery	Tioga
Columbia	Ontario	Tompkins
Cortland	Orleans	Ulster
Delaware	Oswego	Warren
Essex	Otsego	Washington
Franklin	Putnam	Wayne
Fulton	Rensselaer	Wyoming
Genesee	St. Lawrence	Yates
Greene	Saratoga

The following 9 counties have certain townships with population densities of 150 persons or less per square mile:

Albany	Erie	Oneida
Broome	Monroe	Onondaga
Dutchess	Niagara	Orange

Compliance Requirements:

No new reporting, record keeping, or other compliance requirements are being imposed as a result of this proposal.

Professional Services:

No new additional professional services are required in order for providers in rural areas to comply with the proposed amendments.

Compliance Costs:

No initial capital costs will be imposed as a result of this rule, nor will there be an annual cost of compliance. As a result of the amendment to 86-1.62 there will be no increases or decreases in hospitals' revenues. Revenues will shift among individual hospitals depending upon the diagnoses of and approved procedures performed on the patients they treat.

Minimizing Adverse Impact:

The proposed amendments will be applied to all general hospitals. The Department of Health considered the approaches specified in section 202-bb (2) of the State Administrative Procedure Act in drafting the proposed amendments and rejected them as inappropriate given the reimbursement system mandated in statute.

Opportunity for Rural Area Participation:

Rural areas were given notice of this proposal by its inclusion in the agenda of the Fiscal Policy Committee of the State Hospital Review and Planning Council for its November 20, 2008 meeting. That agenda is mailed to members of the Fiscal Policy Committee, the New York State Legislature and representatives of the hospital associations, among others. The associations are member organizations, which represent the needs and concerns of providers across New York State, including rural areas. The amendment was described at meetings of the Fiscal Policy Committee prior to the filing of the notice of proposed rulemaking.

This outreach resulted in the Department of Health receiving comments and suggestions related to additional changes that industry representatives recommended be implemented. Based on this feedback, the Department did make additional changes to the service intensity weights to incorporate several of these comments and suggestions.

Job Impact Statement

A Job Impact Statement is not required pursuant to Section 201-a(2)(a) of the State Administrative Procedure Act. It is apparent, from the nature and purpose of the proposed rules, that they will not have a substantial adverse impact on jobs or employment opportunities. The proposed regulations revise the service intensity weights for the diagnosis related group (DRG) classification system for inpatient hospital services. The DRG classification system, which also has been in effect since 1988, is utilized to reimburse hospitals for inpatient services rendered to Medicaid beneficiaries. The proposed regulations have no implications for job opportunities.