PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following proposed rule:
Proposed Action:
Amendment of Subpart 86-1 of Title 10 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
Public Health Law, sections 2803, 2807, 2807-c, 2807-k, 3612 and 3614
Subject:
Hospital Inpatient Reimbursement.
Purpose:
Modifies current reimbursement for hospital inpatient services due to the implementation of APR DRGs and rebasing of hospital inpatient rates.
Substance of proposed rule (Full text is posted at the following State website:www.health.state.ny.us):
General Summary for 86-1.2 through 86-1.89
The amendments to sections 86-1.2 through 86-1.89 of Title 10 (Health) NYCRR are required to implement a new payment methodology for certain hospital inpatient fee-for-service Medicaid services based on All Patient Refined-Diagnostic Related Groups (APR-DRGs). The new payment methodology proposed by these amendments provides a more transparent and simplified reimbursement system that drives reimbursement consistent with efficiency, quality and public health priorities. It develops one statewide operating base rate using an updated and more reliable cost base rather than current regional and peer group operating base rates which were determined by using extremely outdated costs. The APR-DRG payment system will incorporate patient severity of illness and risk of mortality subclasses to better match patient resource utilization and provide a more precise method for equitable reimbursement.
Text of proposed rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
Katherine Ceroalo, DOH, Bureau of House Counsel, Regulatory Affairs Unit, Room 2438, ESP, Tower Building, Albany, NY 12237, (518) 473-7488, email: regsqna@health.state.ny.us
Data, views or arguments may be submitted to:
Same as above.
Public comment will be received until:
45 days after publication of this notice.
Regulatory Impact Statement
Statutory Authority:
The requirement to implement a modernized Medicaid reimbursement system for hospital inpatient services based upon 2005 base year operating costs pursuant to regulations is set forth in section 2807-c(35) of the Public Health Law. In addition, section 2807-c(4)(e-2) of the Public Health Law requires new per diem rates of reimbursement be implemented for certain exempt units and hospitals based on updated reported operating costs. Section 2807-k(5-b)(a)(ii) and (iv); and (b)(i), (iv) and (v) requires schedules of payment to be set forth in regulations for supplemental indigent care distributions made to certain eligible hospitals.
Legislative Objectives:
After numerous discussions between the Executive, Legislature, hospital associations and other key stakeholders, the Legislature chose to create a new, modernized reimbursement methodology for the State's Medicaid hospital inpatient system. Pursuant to statute, the APR-DRG methodology was chosen as the new reimbursement system for these services.
Needs and Benefits:
The proposed regulations implement the provisions of Public Health Law section 2807-c(35) which requires a new hospital inpatient reimbursement system based on APR-DRGs and rebased costs. This methodology provides a more transparent and simplified reimbursement system that drives reimbursement consistent with efficiency, quality and public health priorities. This new payment methodology will also allow the Department to publish hospital rates more timely, and provide hospitals with greater predictability of their income streams.
The current reimbursement system for hospital inpatient services is extremely outdated, and does not effectively serve the interests of patients, providers, or the Medicaid system. Not only does the system's overall reimbursement greatly exceed the cost of providing such services, the methodology for allocating payments does not appropriately reflect the acuity of the patient, the quality of service, or the efficiency of the hospital. Over the years the current system has accrued numerous groupings, weightings, adjustments, and add-ons that have ultimately distorted the health care delivery system.
Per diem rates of payment by governmental agencies for inpatient services provided by a general hospital or a distinct unit of a general hospital for services in accord with physical medical rehabilitation and chemical dependency rehabilitation; services provided by critical access hospitals; inpatient services provided by specialty long term acute care hospitals; and services provided by facilities designated by the federal department of health and human services as exempt acute care children's hospitals are also developed using an outdated cost base which does not properly reflect current costs incurred for providing such services.
The APR-DRG methodology addresses the inadequacies of the current system by using an updated and more reliable cost base and a patient classification system that incorporates patient severity of illness and risk of mortality subclasses, reflecting the variable costs associated with each individual patient being treated. Utilizing an updated and more precise cost base will have the effect of reducing the total amount of Medicaid reimbursement paid to hospitals for inpatient services, which is found to be significantly overpaid. Accordingly, the State would be able to, consistent with budgetary constraints, reinvest these savings in primary and preventive care and other traditionally under-paid ambulatory care services in order to improve the quality of patient care, ensure adequate access to these services, and avoid more costly inpatient admissions.
Costs:
Costs to State Government:
Section 2807-c(35) of the Public Health Law requires that the rates of payment for hospital inpatient services result in a net state wide decrease in aggregate Medicaid payments of no less than $75 million for the period December 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 and no less than $225 million for the period April 1, 2010 through March 31, 2011. Effective for annual periods beginning January 1, 2010, distributions to hospitals for indigent care pool DSH payments will be made as follows: $269.5 million will be distributed to hospitals, excluding major public hospitals, on a regional basis and within the amounts available for each region, to compensate each eligible hospital's proportional share of unmet need for calendar year 2007; $25 million will be distributed to hospitals, excluding major publics, having Medicaid discharges of 40% or greater as determined from date reported in the 2007 Institutional Cost Report. The distributions will be proportionately distributed based on each eligible facility's uninsured losses to such losses of all the eligible facilities; $16 million will be proportionately distributed to non-teaching hospitals based on each eligible facility's uninsured losses to such losses for all non-teaching hospitals statewide.
Costs of Local Government:
There will be no additional cost to local governments as a result of these amendments because local districts' share of Medicaid costs is statutorily capped.
Costs to the Department of Health:
There will be no additional costs to the Department of Health as a result of these amendments.
Local Government Mandates:
There are no local government mandates.
Paperwork:
There is no additional paperwork required of providers as a result of these amendments.
Duplication:
These regulations do not duplicate existing State and Federal regulations.
Alternatives:
No significant alternatives are available. The Department is required by the Public Health Law sections 2807-c(4)(e-2) and (35); 2807-k(5-b)(a)(ii) and (iv); and (b)(i), (iv), and (v) to promulgate implementing regulations.
Federal Standards:
This amendment does not exceed any minimum standards of the federal government for the same or similar subject areas.
Compliance Schedule:
The proposed amendment establishes the new APR-DRG reimbursement methodology for discharges on or after December 1, 2009; there is no period of time necessary for regulated parties to achieve compliance.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Effect on Small Business and Local Governments:
For the purpose of this regulatory flexibility analysis, small businesses were considered to be general hospitals with 100 or fewer full time equivalents. Based on recent financial and statistical data extracted from the Institutional Cost Report, seven hospitals were identified as employing fewer than 100 employees.
In aggregate, health care providers subject to this regulation will see a decrease in average per discharge Medicaid funding, but this is not anticipated for all affected providers.
This rule will have no direct effect on Local Governments.
Compliance Requirements:
No new reporting, record keeping or other compliance requirements are being imposed as a result of these rules. Affected health care providers will bill Medicaid using procedure codes and ICD-9 codes approved by the American Medical Association, as is currently required. Some billing rate codes will change, but this will have a minimal impact on providers.
The rule should have no direct effect on Local Governments.
Professional Services:
No new or additional professional services are required in order to comply with the proposed amendments.
Compliance Costs:
No initial capital costs will be imposed as a result of this rule, nor will there be an annual cost of compliance. As a result of these amendments to 86-1.2 through 86-1.89 there will be an anticipated decrease in statewide aggregate hospital Medicaid revenues for hospital inpatient services. Revenues will shift among individual hospitals.
Economic and Technological Feasibility:
Small businesses will be able to comply with the economic and technological aspects of this rule. The proposed amendments are technologically feasible because it requires the use of existing technology. The overall economic impact to comply with the requirements of this regulation is expected to be minimal.
Minimizing Adverse Impact:
The proposed amendments reflect statutory intent and requirements. The Legislature considered various alternatives for creating a new Medicaid hospital inpatient reimbursement methodology; however, the enacted budget adopted the APR-DRG methodology.
Small Business and Local Government Participation:
Draft regulations, prior to filing with the Secretary of State, were shared with industry associations representing hospitals and comments were solicited from all affected parties. Informational briefings were held with such associations.
Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
Effect on Rural Areas:
Rural areas are defined as counties with a population less than 200,000 and, for counties with a population greater than 200,000, includes towns with population densities of 150 persons or less per square mile. The following 44 counties have a population less than 200,000:
Allegany
Hamilton
Schenectady
Cattaraugus
Herkimer
Schoharie
Cayuga
Jefferson
Schuyler
Chautauqua
Lewis
Seneca
Chemung
Livingston
Steuben
Chenango
Madison
Sullivan
Clinton
Montgomery
Tioga
Columbia
Ontario
Tompkins
Cortland
Orleans
Ulster
Delaware
Oswego
Warren
Essex
Otsego
Washington
Franklin
Putnam
Wayne
Fulton
Rensselaer
Wyoming
Genesee
St. Lawrence
Yates
Greene
Saratoga
The following 9 counties have certain townships with population densities of 150 persons or less per square mile:
Albany
Erie
Oneida
Broome
Monroe
Onondaga
Dutchess
Niagara
Orange
Compliance Requirements:
No new reporting, record keeping, or other compliance requirements are being imposed as a result of this proposal.
Professional Services:
No new additional professional services are required in order for providers in rural areas to comply with the proposed amendments.
Compliance Costs:
No initial capital costs will be imposed as a result of this rule, nor is there an annual cost of compliance.
Minimizing Adverse Impact:
The proposed amendments reflect statutory intent and requirements. The Legislature considered various alternatives for creating a new Medicaid fee-for-service reimbursement methodology; however, the enacted budget adopted the APR-DRG methodology.
Rural Area Participation:
Draft regulations, prior to filing with the Secretary of State, were shared with the industry associations representing hospitals and comments were solicited from all affected parties. Such associations include members from rural areas.
Job Impact Statement
A Job Impact Statement is not required pursuant to Section 201-a(2)(a) of the State Administrative Procedure Act. It is apparent, from the nature and purpose of the proposed rules, that they will not have a substantial adverse impact on jobs or employment opportunities. The proposed regulations revise the reimbursement system for inpatient hospital services. The proposed regulations have no implications for job opportunities.
