HLT-44-06-00005-E Opioid Overdose Prevention Programs  

  • 2/21/07 N.Y. St. Reg. HLT-44-06-00005-E
    NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
    VOLUME XXIX, ISSUE 8
    February 21, 2007
    RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
    EMERGENCY RULE MAKING
     
    I.D No. HLT-44-06-00005-E
    Filing No. 155
    Filing Date. Feb. 01, 2007
    Effective Date. Feb. 01, 2007
    Opioid Overdose Prevention Programs
    PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
    Action taken:
    Amendment of section 80.138 of Title 10 NYCRR.
    Statutory authority:
    Public Health Law, section 3309(1)
    Finding of necessity for emergency rule:
    Preservation of public health, public safety and general welfare.
    Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity:
    The immediate adoption of this regulation is necessary for the preservation of the public health, safety and general welfare because any delay with the implementation of opioid overdose prevention programs could result in additional deaths that could have been prevented through proper training to be offered through these programs. The legislation recognized the immediacy of the need for opioid overdose prevention programs by making the effective date April 1, 2006. Since compliance with standard rule making procedures would make implementation by the effective date of this law impossible, compliance with those requirements is contrary to the public interest.
    Subject:
    Opioid overdose prevention programs.
    Purpose:
    To implement L. 2005, ch. 413 which calls for the establishment of standards for opioid overdose prevention programs to prevent fatalities due to overdose.
    Text of emergency rule:
    The Table of Contents for Part 80 of Title 10 NYCRR is amended to read as follows:
    PART 80
    RULES AND REGULATIONS ON CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
    (Statutory authority: Public Health Law, Sections 338, 3300, 3305, 3307, 3308, 3309, 3381, 3701(1), (6), art. 33)
    Sec.
    GENERAL PROVISIONS
    80.138. Opioid Overdose Prevention Programs
    A new Section 80.138 is added as follows:
    Section 80.138. Opioid Overdose Prevention Programs.
    (a) Definitions.
    (1) “Clinical Director” means a physician, physician assistant or nurse practitioner who provides oversight of the clinical aspects of the Opioid Overdose Prevention Program. This oversight includes serving as a clinical advisor and liaison concerning medical issues related to the Opioid Overdose Prevention Program, providing consultation on training and reviewing reports of all administrations of an opioid antagonist.
    (2) “Opioid” means an opiate as defined in section 3302 of the public health law.
    (3) “Opioid antagonist” means an FDA-approved drug that, when administered, negates or neutralizes in whole or in part the pharmacological effects of an opioid in the body. The opioid antagonist is limited to naloxone or other medications approved by the Department for this purpose.
    (4) “Opioid Overdose Prevention Program” means a program the purpose of which is to train individuals to prevent a fatal opioid overdose in accordance with these regulations.
    (5) “Opioid Overdose Prevention Training Program” means a training program offered by an authorized Opioid Overdose Prevention Program which instructs a person to prevent opioid overdoses, including by providing resuscitation, contacting emergency medical services and administering an opioid antagonist.
    (6) “Person” means an individual other than a licensed health care professional, law enforcement personnel, and first responders otherwise permitted by law to administer an opioid antagonist.
    (7) “Program Director” means an individual who is identified to manage and have overall responsibility for the Opioid Overdose Prevention Program.
    (8) “Registered provider” for the purposes of this section shall mean any of the following that have registered with the Department pursuant to subsection (b):
    (i) a health care facility licensed under the public health law;
    (ii) a physician, physician assistant, or nurse practitioner who is authorized to prescribe the use of an opioid antagonist;
    (iii) a drug treatment program licensed under the mental hygiene law;
    (iv) a not-for-profit community-based organization incorporated under the not-for-profit corporation law and having the services of a Clinical Director;
    (v) a local health department.
    (9) “Trained Overdose Responder” means a person who has successfully completed an authorized Opioid Overdose Prevention Training Program offered by an authorized Opioid Overdose Prevention Program within the past two years and has been authorized by a Registered Provider to possess the opioid antagonist.
    (b) Registration.
    (1) Registered providers may operate an Opioid Overdose Prevention Program if they obtain a certificate of approval from the Department authorizing them to operate an Opioid Overdose Prevention Program and otherwise comply with the provisions of this section.
    (2) Providers eligible to register to operate an Opioid Overdose Prevention Program that are in good standing may apply to the Department to operate an Opioid Overdose Prevention Program on forms prescribed by the Department which must include, at a minimum, the following information:
    (i) the provider name, address, operating certificate or license number where appropriate, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address, Program Director and Clinical Director;
    (ii) the name, license type and license number of the affiliated prescriber(s);
    (iii) the name and location of the site(s) at which the Opioid Overdose Prevention Program will be conducted;
    (iv) a description of the targeted population to be served and recruitment strategies to be employed by the Opioid Overdose Prevention Program; and
    (v) the addresses, telephone numbers, fax numbers, e-mail addresses and signatures of the Program Director and Clinical Director.
    (c) Program Operation.
    (1) Each Opioid Overdose Prevention Program shall have a Program Director who is responsible for managing the Opioid Overdose Prevention Program and shall, at a minimum:
    (i) identify a Clinical Director to oversee the clinical aspects of the Opioid Overdose Prevention Program;
    (ii) establish the content of the training program, which meets the approval of the Department;
    (iii) identify and train other program staff;
    (iv) select and identify persons as Trained Overdose Responders;
    (v) issue certificates of completion to Trained Overdose Responders who have completed the prescribed program;
    (vi) maintain Opioid Overdose Prevention Program records including Trained Overdose Responder training records, Opioid Overdose Prevention Program usage records and inventories of Opioid Overdose Prevention Program supplies and materials;
    (vii) ensure that all Trained Overdose Responders successfully complete all components of Opioid Overdose Prevention Training Program;
    (viii) provide liaison with local emergency medical services and emergency dispatch agencies, where appropriate;
    (ix) assist the Clinical Director with review of reports of all overdose responses, particularly those including opioid antagonist administration; and
    (x) report all administrations of an opioid antagonist on forms prescribed by the Department.
    (2) Each Opioid Overdose Prevention Program shall have a Clinical Director who is responsible for clinical oversight and liaison concerning medical issues related to the Opioid Overdose Prevention Program and, at a minimum, shall:
    (i) provide clinical consultation, expertise, and oversight;
    (ii) serve as a clinical advisor and liaison concerning medical issues related to the Opioid Overdose Prevention Program;
    (iii) provide consultation to ensure that all Trained Overdose Responders are properly trained;
    (iv) adapt and approve training program content and protocols; and
    (v) review reports of all administrations of an opioid antagonist.
    (3) The Trained Overdose Responders shall:
    (i) complete an initial Opioid Overdose Prevention Training Program;
    (ii) complete a refresher Opioid Overdose Prevention Training program at least every two (2) years;
    (iii) contact the emergency medical system during any response to a victim of suspected drug overdose and advise if an opioid antagonist is being used;
    (iv) comply with protocols for response to victims of suspected drug overdose; and
    (v) report all responses to victims of suspected drug overdose to the Opioid Overdose Prevention Program Director.
    (4) The opioid antagonist shall be dispensed to the Trained Overdose Responder in accordance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations.
    (5) The Opioid Overdose Prevention Program will maintain and provide response supplies including: latex gloves, mask or other barrier for use during rescue breathing, and agent to prepare skin before injection.
    (6) The Opioid Overdose Prevention Program will establish and maintain a record keeping system that will include, at a minimum, the following information:
    (i) list of Trained Overdose Responders, including dates of completion of training;
    (ii) a log of Opioid Overdose Prevention Trainings which have been conducted;
    (iii) copies of program policies and procedures;
    (iv) copy of the contract/agreement with the Clinical Director, if appropriate;
    (v) opioid antagonist administration usage reports and forms; and
    (vi) documentation of review of administration of an opioid antagonist.
    (7) The Opioid Overdose Prevention Program will establish a procedure by which any administration of Opioid Antagonist to another individual by a Trained Overdose Responder affiliated with an Opioid Overdose Prevention Program, shall be reported on forms prescribed by the Department.
    (8) Approval obtained pursuant to this section shall consist of a certificate of approval provided by the Department that shall remain in effect for two years or until receipt by the authorized provider of a written notice of termination of the program from the Department, whichever shall first occur. The Department may renew a certificate of approval for a subsequent two-year period if the registered provider is in good standing with all applicable state and federal licensing agencies and such provider is found to have complied with the requirements of this section and has submitted a request for renewal.
    (9) Pursuant to Public Health Law Section 3309(2) the purchase, acquisition, possession or use of an opioid antagonist by an Opioid Overdose Prevention Program or a Trained Overdose Responder in accordance with this section and the training provided by an authorized Opioid Overdose Prevention Program shall not constitute the unlawful practice of a professional or other violation under title eight of the education law or article 33 of the public health law.
    This notice is intended
    to serve only as a notice of emergency adoption. This agency intends to adopt the provisions of this emergency rule as a permanent rule, having previously published a notice of proposed rule making, I.D. No. HLT-44-06-00005-P, Issue of November 1, 2006. The emergency rule will expire April 1, 2007.
    Text of emergency rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
    William Johnson, Department of Health, Division of Legal Affairs, Office of Regulatory Reform, Corning Tower, Rm. 2415, Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12237, (518) 473-7488, fax: (518) 486-4834, e-mail: regsqna@health.state.ny.us
    Regulatory Impact Statement
    Statutory Authority:
    Chapter 413 of the Laws of 2005 amended the Public Health Law to add a new Section 3309 to provide for opioid overdose prevention programs in New York State. Section 3309(1) authorizes the Commissioner of Health to establish standards for approval of opioid overdose prevention programs, including, but not limited to, standards for program directors, clinical oversight, training, record keeping and reporting. The effective date of Chapter 413 of the Laws of 2005 is April 1, 2006.
    Legislative Objectives:
    This legislation was enacted to reduce the incidence of fatal opioid overdoses by providing training to individuals to increase the likelihood that timely administration of life-saving medication will be provided on an emergency basis to individuals who experience accidental opioid drug overdoses.
    Needs and Benefits:
    Approximately half of all injection drug users (IDUs) experience at least one nonfatal overdose during their lifetime. According to the New York State (NYS) Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services (OASAS) estimates, there are approximately 171,500 IDUs in NYS. Overdose is a preventable cause of death in the majority of cases involving opioids. Opioids include heroin, morphine, codeine, methadone, oxycodone (Oxycontin, Percodan, Percocet), hydrocodone (Vicodin), fentanyl (Duragesic) and hydromorphone (Dilaudid). In an opioid overdose, the user becomes sedated and gradually loses the urge to breathe, leading to death from respiratory depression. Naloxone is an opioid receptor antagonist that can be used to reverse an opioid overdose within 1–2 minutes of administration. An untreated heroin overdose will result in death in 1–3 hours.
    Although a comprehensive picture of the extent of opioid overdose in NYS does not yet exist, drug overdose is known to be a major cause of death among heroin users (Garfield and Drucker, 2001). Accidental fatal drug overdose continues to be a substantial cause of death. It has been one of the top ten causes of death in New York City (NYC) from 1993 to present (NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 2003). According to a study conducted by the New York Academy of Medicine, between 1990 and 1998 there were 5,506 accidental fatal overdoses in NYC involving opiates (Galea et al., 2003). These reflected 74% of all accidental overdose deaths (7,451) in NYC during that period.
    NYS Department of Health (NYSDOH) hospital data show that, during 1998–2004, there were 3,408 hospital discharges reflecting admissions for which heroin-overdose was a factor. Of these, 2,183 (64%) were in NYC. Another 25% were in the Syracuse, Rochester, Buffalo, Albany and Nassau-Suffolk regions.
    The federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) determined that the case rate for emergency department heroin admissions in NYC in 2002 was reported to be 123 per 100,000 population, which was more than three times the national rate of 36 per 100,000 (SAMHSA, March 2004). Between 1995 and 2002, heroin-related emergency department visits in Buffalo increased 125 percent (from 41 to 93 visits per 100,000 population with a 29 percent increase from 2001 to 2002 (from 72 visits) (SAMHSA, April 2004).
    Most overdoses are not instantaneous and the majority of them are witnessed by others. Therefore, many overdose fatalities are preventable, especially if witnesses have had appropriate training and are prepared to respond in a safe and effective manner. Prevention measures include education on risk factors (such as polydrug use and recent abstinence), recognition of the overdose and an appropriate response. Response includes contacting emergency medical services (EMS) and providing resuscitation while awaiting the arrival of EMS. Resuscitation consists of rescue breathing, or if available, injectable naloxone which immediately reverses the effects of heroin overdose. Naloxone is an opioid antagonist with no abuse potential and no effect on a recipient who has not taken opioids. Provision of naloxone has been suggested for many years and is being offered in a variety of settings in jurisdictions outside of NYS. Complications of naloxone in the medical setting are rare. Naloxone is inexpensive ($1.00–$1.50) and there have been no cases in which it has developed a street value.
    Opioid overdose prevention programs have proven effective in preventing unnecessary deaths abroad and elsewhere in the United States (US). In the US, opioid overdose prevention programs exist in New Mexico; Chicago, Illinois; Baltimore, Maryland; and San Francisco, California, for example, and programs are being planned elsewhere. A recently published evaluation of an opioid overdose prevention program in San Francisco showed that of the 20 heroin overdoses witnessed by trained program participants there were no deaths. (Seal et al., 2005). As of August 2005, the New Mexico Department of Health had trained and provided naloxone to a total of 1,168 individuals. There were over 191 reports of lives saved, of which 185 involved administration of naloxone. Almost all administrations of naloxone were accompanied by rescue breathing and 5 lives were saved with rescue breathing alone. (Fiuty, P., personal communication, November 3, 2005). The Chicago Recovery Alliance has reported training over 4,500 individuals, with 374 reported reversals using naloxone, as of November 3, 2005. There has been a 30% overall decline in overdose related deaths reported in Cook County, Illinois (Carlberg, S. Personal communication, November 3, 2005). The Baltimore City Health Department has reported 888 persons trained, 101 reported reversals and over 20 persons placed into drug treatment. A 17% decrease in overdose deaths was observed from 2001 to 2002 (Rucker, M., personal communication, November 3, 2005).
    The potential exists to achieve similar outcomes in NYS through the establishment of opioid overdose prevention programs. Potential providers that may register voluntarily with NYSDOH to offer such programs include health and human service providers serving IDUs (such as NYSDOH-approved syringe exchange programs and other community-based organizations, health care practitioners (specifically physicians, physician assistants and nurse practitioners), local health departments, health care facilities licensed by NYSDOH under Article 28 of the NYS Public Health Law and drug treatment programs licensed by the NYS Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services (OASAS) pursuant to the NYS Mental Hygiene Law).
    The proposed rule, which is entirely within the legislative mandate of Section 3309 of the Public Health Law, is consistent with established models for opioid overdose prevention programs elsewhere. Common features of opioid overdose prevention programs operating elsewhere that have been incorporated into the proposed rule include: a Program Director who is responsible for managing the program and assuring that program participants receive adequate training; a Clinical Director who oversees clinical aspects; use of a curriculum that provides program participants with the necessary knowledge, skills and abilities to prevent fatal overdoses through administration of naloxone, use of rescue breathing and contacting emergency medical services; maintaining program records, such as those surrounding trainings offered, including issuance of certificates of completion to those who successfully complete the training; and collection of basic information about impact of the program in terms of incidents and lives saved.
    The anticipated benefits under the proposed rule are: reduced incidence of fatal opioid overdoses, increased contact of IDUs with medical personnel, greater awareness of risk factors for overdose, increased knowledge of safer injection practices and an increased number of persons trained in rescue breathing. The creation of opioid overdose prevention programs will not lead to increased drug use. Naloxone is not addictive and does not cause a “high.” It has no potential for abuse or street value.
    Costs:
    Since this regulation allows providers to establish opioid overdose prevention programs, but does not require a provider to establish such a program, no provider will be required to incur costs as a result of the adoption of this regulation. Existing staff can serve as the Program Director and provide clinical oversight. No registration fee will be collected and the reporting requirements will be minimal. A one-time, registration process to receive a certificate of approval is required with review and renewal every two years. An internal operational policy and procedure and training of staff regarding program implementation will be required. Since it is expected that registration, record keeping and the development of policies, procedures and training materials will be done by existing staff, the costs of complying with this regulation will be minimal. Costs to the Department of Health are also expected to be minimal since the production and review of all documents will be done by existing staff.
    Local Government Mandates:
    This regulation does not impose any program, service, duty, or other responsibility on any county, city, town, village, school, fire district, or other special district except to the extent that such entities choose to provide opioid overdose prevention programs and, consequently, would be subject to the same requirements as all other providers.
    Paperwork:
    The NYSDOH anticipates a simple and streamlined registration process for seeking a certificate of approval to establish an opioid overdose prevention program. Additional record keeping requirements and reporting requirements will be minimal. Paperwork will include documentation of staff training, program policies and procedures, logs of training sessions offered and certificates of completion provided, inventories of program supplies and materials, reports of overdoses to which trained program participants have responded and reports to the Department. Only those providers voluntarily participating will be required to provide information to the Department.
    Duplication:
    The proposed regulation does not duplicate any existing state or federal law or regulation regarding opioid overdose prevention.
    Alternatives:
    The proposed regulation does not exceed the specific requirements of the legislation. Because offering an opioid overdose prevention program is voluntary, the regulation was designed to encourage eligible individuals and organizations to provide opioid overdose prevention services allowed under law and regulation. The registration process will be simple and the reporting and financial impact of establishing a voluntary opioid overdose prevention program will be minimal. Any other alternatives would require a more complex and more costly approach for both the NYSDOH and volunteer operators of opioid overdose prevention programs.
    Federal Standards:
    The rule does not exceed any minimum standards of the federal government for the same or similar subject areas.
    Compliance Schedule:
    Each individual or organization that chooses to establish an opioid overdose prevention program must submit a registration form to the Department. Information will be distributed to eligible parties to allow implementation on April 1, 2006. Registration information will be used to develop a listing of opioid overdose prevention programs holding certificates of approval issued by the Department. Registration forms from those seeking to establish opioid overdose prevention programs will be accepted on a continuous basis, with review and renewal of certificates of approval taking place at two-year intervals.
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
    Effect of Rule:
    The proposed rule will have no impact on small businesses unless such businesses voluntarily decide to operate an Opioid Overdose Prevention Program. The types of businesses that could be affected include hospitals, clinics, health care practitioners, drug treatment programs, community-based organizations and local governments (health departments). In New York State there are 7 hospitals, 245 clinics, 1,164 drug treatment programs, an unknown number of community-based organizations and 36 county health departments that are considered small businesses.
    Compliance Requirements:
    Under the proposed rule, hospitals, clinics, health care practitioners, drug treatment programs, community-based organizations and local health departments that elect to establish opioid overdose prevention programs will report aggregate data on forms prescribed by the NYSDOH. Providers must have a Program Director who is responsible for managing the program and assuring that program participants receive adequate training; a Clinical Director who oversees clinical aspects; use of a curriculum that provides program participants with the necessary knowledge, skills and abilities to prevent fatal overdoses through administration of naloxone, use of rescue breathing and contacting emergency medical services; maintaining program records, such as those surrounding trainings offered, including issuance of certificates of completion to those who successfully complete the training; and collection of basic information about impact of the program in terms of incidents and lives saved.
    Programs must also keep records including but not limited to documentation of staff training, program policies and procedures, logs of training sessions offered and certificates of completion provided, inventories of program supplies and materials, reports of overdoses to which trained program participants have responded and reports to the Department. Aside from simple reporting of certain easy-to-collect data, no new requirements are mandated.
    Professional Services:
    No additional professional services will be required since providers and others will be able to utilize existing staff.
    Compliance Costs:
    Since this regulation allows providers to establish opioid overdose prevention programs, but does not require a provider to establish such a program, no provider will be required to incur costs as a result of the adoption of this regulation. Existing staff can serve as the Program Director and provide clinical oversight. No registration fee will be collected and the reporting requirements will be minimal. A one-time, registration process to receive a certificate of approval is required with review and renewal every two years. An internal operational policy and procedure and training of staff regarding program implementation will be required. Since it is expected that registration, record keeping and the development of policies, procedures and training materials will be done by existing staff, the costs of complying with this regulation will be minimal. Costs to the Department of Health are also expected to be minimal since the production and review of all documents will be done by existing staff.
    Economic and Technological Feasibility:
    Most health care facilities, health care practitioners, drug treatment programs, community-based organizations and local health departments that are eligible to offer opioid overdose prevention programs have the capacity and expertise to carry out the necessary activities. Small businesses that opt to voluntarily offer opioid overdose prevention programs will be provided with necessary forms and instructions to register and comply with reporting requirements. In large part, these forms and instructions are being/will be developed with specific input from regulated parties and NYSDOH staff are being made available to provide instructions and technical assistance.
    Minimizing Adverse Impact:
    There are no alternatives to the proposed recordkeeping and reporting requirements due to the need for the NYSDOH to assure that registered providers holding certificates of approval to operate opioid overdose prevention programs conduct activities in a safe and effective manner. Reporting requirements are those minimally necessary for the Department to coordinate oversight and provide information to the Governor and the Legislature as required by Section 3309(4) of the Public Health Law.
    Small Business and Local Government Participation:
    The regulations are minimal and consultation on program implementation will take place prior to the April 1, 2006 effective date of the law, and beyond. Small businesses (hospitals, clinics, health care practitioners, drug treatment programs, community-based organizations and local health departments) will have opportunities to review and comment on the proposed regulations. The NYSDOH has already begun to have conversations with providers interested in offering this service that are small businesses and local health departments and has consulted with representatives of opioid overdose prevention programs already operating in other states that are offered by small businesses and local health departments.
    NYSDOH staff will consult with statewide organizations representing hospitals, clinics, health care practitioners, drug treatment programs, community-based organizations and local health departments. Examples include the Hospital Association of NYS, Greater New York Hospital Association, Community Health Center Association of NYS (CHCANYS), Medical Society of the State of New York, New York Academy of Medicine, Harm Reduction Coalition, NYSDOH-approved syringe exchange programs, New York AIDS Coalition, and the NYS Association of County Health Officials (NYSACHO). The proposed regulation will be discussed at meetings of the NYS AIDS Advisory Council and the NYS HIV Prevention Planning Group (PPG), both of which include representatives from a variety of types of organizations.
    The NYSDOH has considered all comments received in this process in development of the proposed rule. Additional comments are being sought and will be considered.
    Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
    Types and Estimated Numbers of Rural Areas:
    Rural areas are defined as counties with a population less than 200,000 and, for counties with a population greater than 200,000, includes towns with population densities of 150 persons or less per square mile. There are 44 counties in NYS with a population less than 200,000. Nine counties have certain townships with population densities of 150 persons or less per square mile. The proposed rule will have no impact on hospitals, clinics, health care practitioners, drug treatment programs and local governments in these rural areas, unless such providers voluntarily decide to operate opioid overdose prevention programs.
    Hospital, clinic, health care practitioner, drug treatment program, community-based organization and local health department participation in making opioid overdose prevention programs available will be on a voluntary basis and potential providers will make individual decisions regarding participation. Potential providers are most likely to be located in urban or suburban, not rural, areas. For example, NYSDOH SPARCS data show 3,408 hospital discharges for admissions related to opioid overdose during 1998–2002. Of these, 2,183 (64%) were in NYC. Another 25% were in the Syracuse, Rochester, Buffalo, Albany and Nassau-Suffolk regions. Similarly, OASAS county-level estimates of treatment need show that the greatest need for opioid overdose prevention programs is in urban or suburban areas (OASAS, 2004 County Resource Book, Volume 1. Service Need and Utilization Data, Table 2).
    Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other Compliance Requirements; and Professional Services:
    The NYSDOH anticipates a simple and streamlined registration process for seeking a certificate of approval to establish an opioid overdose prevention program. Additional record keeping requirements and reporting requirements will be minimal. Paperwork will include documentation of staff training, program policies and procedures, logs of training sessions offered and certificates of completion provided, inventories of program supplies and materials, reports of overdoses to which trained program participants have responded and reports to the Department. Only those providers voluntarily participating will be required to provide information to the Department.
    Costs:
    Since this regulation allows providers to establish opioid overdose prevention programs, but does not require a provider to establish such a program, no provider will be required to incur costs as a result of the adoption of this regulation. Existing staff can serve as the Program Director and provide clinical oversight. No registration fee will be collected and the reporting requirements will be minimal. A one-time, registration process to receive a certificate of approval is required with review and renewal every two years. An internal operational policy and procedure and training of staff regarding program implementation will be required. Since it is expected that registration, record keeping and the development of policies, procedures and training materials will be done by existing staff, the costs of complying with this regulation will be minimal. Costs to the Department of Health are also expected to be minimal since the production and review of all documents will be done by existing staff.
    Minimizing Adverse Impact:
    The program is designed to minimize impact on those who will participate: participation is voluntary, the registration process will be simple, no fee will be charged, and record-keeping requirements will be minimal.
    The new opioid overdose prevention programs will build upon already-existing programs and services for IDUs - - through hospitals, clinics, health care practitioners, drug treatment programs, community-based organizations and local health departments. The NYSDOH will maintain and make available a list of registered programs holding certificates of approval.
    Rural Area Participation:
    The regulations are minimal and consultation on program implementation will take place prior to the April 1, 2006 effective date of the law, and beyond. Hospitals, clinics, health care practitioners, drug treatment programs, community-based organizations and local health departments in rural areas will have opportunities to review and comment on the proposed regulations. The NYSDOH has already consulted with representatives of opioid overdose prevention programs already operating in rural areas of other states.
    NYSDOH staff will consult with statewide organizations representing hospitals, clinics, health care practitioners, drug treatment programs, community-based organizations and local health departments. Examples include the Hospital Association of NYS, Greater New York Hospital Association, Community Health Center Association of NYS (CHCANYS), Medical Society of the State of New York, New York Academy of Medicine, Harm Reduction Coalition, NYSDOH-approved syringe exchange programs, New York AIDS Coalition, and the NYS Association of County Health Officials (NYSACHO). The proposed regulation will be discussed at meetings of the NYS AIDS Advisory Council and the NYS HIV Prevention Planning Group (PPG), both of which include representatives from a variety of types of organizations.
    The NYSDOH has considered all comments received in this process in development of the proposed rule. Additional comments are being sought and will be considered.
    Job Impact Statement
    A Job Impact Statement is not required. The proposed rule will not have a substantial adverse impact on jobs and employment opportunities based upon its nature and purpose.
    Assessment of Public Comment
    The agency received no public comment.

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/1/2007
Publish Date:
02/21/2007