Home » 2009 Issues » April 08, 2009 » PSC-14-09-00011-P Specific Multifamily and Multifamily Low-income Residential Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
PSC-14-09-00011-P Specific Multifamily and Multifamily Low-income Residential Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
4/8/09 N.Y. St. Reg. PSC-14-09-00011-P
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XXXI, ISSUE 14
April 08, 2009
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
NO HEARING(S) SCHEDULED
I.D No. PSC-14-09-00011-P
Specific Multifamily and Multifamily Low-income Residential Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following proposed rule:
Proposed Action:
The Commission is considering multifamily and multifamily low-income residential electric energy efficiency program proposals as a component of the Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard.
Statutory authority:
Public Service Law, sections 4(1), 5(2) and 66(1)
Subject:
Specific multifamily and multifamily low-income residential electric energy efficiency programs.
Purpose:
To encourage electric energy conservation in the State.
Substance of proposed rule:
The Commission is considering whether to adopt, modify, or reject, in whole or in part, multifamily residential and multifamily low-income residential electric energy efficiency program proposals made in response to an order in Case 07-M-0548 entitled "Order Establishing Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard and Approving Programs" issued by the Public Service Commission on June 23, 2008 [see Ordering Clauses 8, 10 & 17]. For potential independent program administrators that submitted updated proposals for programs in accordance with Ordering Clause 8 of the aforementioned June 23, 2008 Order, such submissions shall be considered as pre-filed comments responsive to this notice to the degree that they relate to the provision of electric energy efficiency programs for large industrial customers. The program proposals under consideration for this rule include the following:
1. Case 08-E-1127 - Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., "Residential and Commercial Energy Efficiency Programs" dated September 22, 2008:
(a) Targeted Demand Side Management Program; (b) Commercial and Industrial Equipment Rebate Program; (c) Refridgerator Replacement Pilot Program; and (d) Steam Cooling Program.
2. Case 08-E-1129 - New York State Electric & Gas Corporation and Case 08-E-1130 - Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, "Electric Program Plan of New York State Electric & Gas Corporation and Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation" dated September 22, 2008: (a) Residential/Non-Residential Multifamily Program.
3. Case 08-E-1132 - New York State Research and Development Authority, " Energy Efficiency Portfolio Program Administrator Proposal" dated September 22, 2008: (a) Electric Reduction in Master-metered Multi-family Building Program; (b) GeoThermal Heat Pump Systems Incentives Program; (c) Multi-family performance Program (MFPP) Expansion (electric portion); and (d) Solar Thermal Incentives Program.
4. Case 08-E-1133 - Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid, "Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Program Proposals " dated September 22, 2008: (a) EnergyWise Program.
Text of proposed rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained by filing a Document Request Form (F-96) located on our website http://www.dps.state.ny.us/f96dir.htm. For questions, contact:
Leann Ayer, Public Service Commission, 3 Empire State Plaza, Albany, New York 12223-1350, (518) 486-2655, email: leann_ayer@dps.state.ny.us
Data, views or arguments may be submitted to:
Jaclyn A. Brilling, Secretary, Public Service Commission, 3 Empire State Plaza, Albany, New York 12223-1350, (518) 474-6530, email: jaclyn_brilling@dps.state.ny.us
Public comment will be received until:
45 days after publication of this notice.
Regulatory Impact Statement, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Rural Area Flexibility Analysis and Job Impact Statement
Statements and analyses are not submitted with this notice because the proposed rule is within the definition contained in section 102(2)(a)(ii) of the State Administrative Procedure Act.