Home » 2013 Issues » May 29, 2013 » CJS-22-12-00016-A Limits on Administrative Expenses and Executive Compensation
CJS-22-12-00016-A Limits on Administrative Expenses and Executive Compensation
5/29/13 N.Y. St. Reg. CJS-22-12-00016-A
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XXXV, ISSUE 22
May 29, 2013
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES
NOTICE OF ADOPTION
I.D No. CJS-22-12-00016-A
Filing No. 516
Filing Date. May. 14, 2013
Effective Date. Jul. 01, 2013
Limits on Administrative Expenses and Executive Compensation
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
Action taken:
Addition of Part 6157 to Title 9 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
Executive Order No. 38; Executive Law, section 837(13); and Not-For-Profit Corporation Law, section 508
Subject:
Limits on administrative expenses and executive compensation.
Purpose:
To implement Executive Order No. 38 issued by Governor Andrew Cuomo on January 18, 2012.
Substance of final rule:
The Division of Criminal Justice Services (Division) is adopting 9 NYCRR Part 6157 as final regulations.
There have been minor edits to the text as follows:
• Section 6157.2(h) - edit to the definition of “executive compensation”.
• Section 6157.4(b)(2) - clarification in provision pertaining to “Limits on Executive Compensation”.
Section 6157.2 contains definitions for purposes of this Part, including definitions for administrative expenses, covered operating expenses, covered executive, covered provider, covered reporting period, executive compensation, program services, program services expenses, related organization, reporting period, State-authorized payments, and State funds.
Section 6157.3. Limits on Administrative Expenses. Contains limits on the use of State funds or State-authorized payments for administrative expenses.
Section 6157.4. Limits on Executive Compensation. Contains restrictions on executive compensation provided to covered executives.
Section 6157.5. Waivers. Processes are established for covered providers to seek waivers of the limits on administrative expenses and the limits on executive compensation.
Section 6157.6. Reporting. Covered providers are required to report information on an annual basis.
Section 6157.7. Penalties. A process is established for the imposition of penalties in the event of non-compliance with the limits on administrative expenses or the limits on executive compensation.
A copy of the full text of the regulatory proposal is available on The Division’s website at http://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/.
Final rule as compared with last published rule:
Nonsubstantive changes were made in sections 6157.2(h) and 6157.4(b)(2).
Revised rule making(s) were previously published in the State Register on
October 31, 2012 and March 13, 2013.
Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
Natasha M. Harvin, Esq., Division of Criminal Justice Services, Alfred E. Smith Office Building, South Swan Street, Albany, New York 12210, (518) 457-8413, email: natasha.harvin@dcjs.ny.gov
Revised Regulatory Impact Statement
Changes made to the last published rule do not necessitate revisions to the previously published Regulatory Impact Statement (“RIS”) for 9 NYCRR Part 6157.
The revisions to the last published rule merely provide clarifications in the text and correct technical errors (i.e., grammar), which require no change to the Regulatory Impact Statement.
Revised Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Changes made to the last published rule do not necessitate revisions to the previously published Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Small Businesses and Local Governments (RFASBLG) for 9 NYCRR Part 6157.
The revisions to the last published rule merely provide clarifications in the text and correct technical errors (i.e., grammar), which require no change to the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Small Businesses and Local Governments.
Revised Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
Changes made to the last published rule do not necessitate revisions to the previously published Rural Area Flexibility Analysis (RAFA) for 9 NYCRR Part 6157.
The revisions to the last published rule merely provide clarifications in the text and correct technical errors (i.e., grammar), which require no change to the Rural Area Flexibility Analysis.
Revised Job Impact Statement
Changes made to the last published rule do not necessitate revisions to the previously published Job Impact Statement (JIS) for 9 NYCRR Part 6157.
The revisions to the last published rule merely provide clarifications in the text and correct technical errors (i.e., grammar), which require no change to the Job Impact Statement.
Initial Review of Rule
As a rule that does not require a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Rural Area Flexibility Analysis or Job Impact Statement, this rule will be initially reviewed in the calendar year 2018, which is no later than the 5th year after the year in which this rule is being adopted
Assessment of Public Comment
“Limits on Administrative Expenses and Executive Compensation”
A Notice of Revised Rule Making was published in the New York State Register on March 13, 2013. The Division of Criminal Justice Services (Division) received several comments during the public comment period associated with the revised rule making. The issues and concerns raised in these comments are set forth below. Issues and concerns have been grouped according to the part of the revised rule they address because they are related or for convenience in providing an efficient response. Because many comments addressed concerns that applied to all of the participating State agencies that are implementing Executive Order No. 38, the responses to comments provided by each of those agencies are incorporated by reference into these responses. The Division’s response is provided for each issue.
Definitions
Comment: One comment was received requesting exhaustive lists of what constitutes “state funds” and “state-authorized payments”.
Response: The proposed regulations were previously modified to clarify what constitutes “state funds” and “state-authorized payments”. However, additional guidance on this topic will be provided prior to the effective date.
Limits on Administrative Expenses
Comment: One comment was received requesting that the State engage in a dialogue with covered providers over what would constitute an adequate administrative rate.
Response: The Division believes that there is a legitimate government interest in limiting the amount of administrative expenses derived from government funds and that the limits set by the proposed regulations are appropriate. However, the Division will continue to monitor this issue in the years that follow. No changes were made to the proposed regulations in response to this comment.
Limits on Executive Compensation
Comment: One comment was received questioning the concept of limiting executive compensation for not-for-profit entities.
Response: The Division believes that there is a legitimate government interest in limiting the amount of executive compensation of providers that rely heavily on State funds or State-authorized payments of federal funds. No changes were made to the proposed regulations in response to this comment.
Comment: One comment was received arguing that the regulations cannot be made effective on July 1, 2013 because the Division of the Budget has not yet identified, provided or recognized any surveys on executive compensation, thus preventing covered providers from determining whether waivers will be needed.
Response: Additional guidance on this topic will be provided prior to the effective date.
Comment: One comment was received arguing that covered providers may be in the position of having to attempt to recoup executive compensation funds and may not be able to do so under the Labor Law, and that if a waiver is not granted, the covered provider would have no ability to recoup such funds, thus having no mechanism to avoid non-compliance with the proposed regulations.
Response: A covered provider who is faced with this dilemma may request a waiver. The waiver provisions of the regulations are intended to avoid placing covered providers into situations where compliance with competing legal requirements is impossible.
Comment: One comment was received requesting that the Division of the Budget create a list of compensation surveys that will be identified, provided and recognized by the State, and that such surveys consider executive compensation in both the not-for-profit and for-profit fields.
Response: Prior to the effective date, guidance will be provided regarding acceptable surveys and comparability factors that must be taken into consideration for determining compensation, and additional information regarding how this information will be identified, provided or recognized.
Waivers
Comment: One comment was received requesting clarification of the consequences of the denial of a waiver.
Response: The proposed regulations provide for penalties in the event of non-compliance by a covered provider that does not obtain a waiver. If a covered provider fails to obtain a waiver and is thus out of compliance with the requirements, the covered provider may be subject to penalties. However, the proposed regulations addressing penalties provide for a six-month period for a covered provider to cure the non-compliance, so the failure to obtain a waiver would not automatically result in the imposition of penalties. No changes were made to the proposed regulations in response to this comment.
Effective Date
Comment: One comment was received requesting that the effective date of the proposed regulations be extended to six months after a covered provider’s first reporting period after the later of: (1) the date the regulations become effective; or (2) the identification, provision and recognition by the Division of the Budget and the State agencies of compensation surveys, in order to afford not-for-profit entities time to comply.
Response: Additional guidance will be provided prior to the effective date to facilitate compliance and/ or the waiver process. No changes were made to the proposed regulations in response to this comment.
Lack of Necessity
Comment: One comment was received asserting that the proposed regulations address a problem that does not really exist, other than in a few isolated circumstances, and that the proposed regulations are not needed to address those few circumstances.
Response: The Division believes that the regulations will serve a necessary function by establishing appropriate controls so that taxpayer dollars are used properly, efficiently and effectively to improve the lives of New Yorkers. No changes were made to the proposed regulations in response to this comment.
Coordination
Comment: One comment was received requesting that the Governor, the Attorney General and the State agencies work together so that the regulations are implemented properly and consistently, and that the nonprofit sector be included in a taskforce to implement the regulations.
Response: The development of the proposed regulations will continue to involve interagency cooperation. No changes were made to the proposed regulations in response to this comment.
