6/25/14 N.Y. St. Reg. PSC-25-14-00012-P
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following proposed rule:
Proposed Action:
The Commission is considering whether to adopt, modify, or reject, in whole or in part, the petition filed on behalf of certain NYPA municipal customers seeking to opt-in to the System Benefits Charge (SBC) and Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) programs.
Statutory authority:
Public Service Law, sections 4(1), 5(1)(b), (2), 65(1), 66(1), (2), (4), (5), (9) and (12)
Subject:
The inclusion of certain New York Power Authority (NYPA) municipal customers in the SBC and RPS programs.
Purpose:
To establish whether certain NYPA municipal customers should be included in the SBC and RPS programs.
Substance of proposed rule:
The Public Service Commission (Commission) is considering whether to adopt, modify, or reject, in whole or in part, the petition dated May 1, 2014 and filed on May 8, 2014 by Global Structured Finance Advisors and GP Renewables & Trading, LLC, on behalf of certain New York Power Authority municipal customers, seeking to opt-in to the System Benefits Charge and Renewable Portfolio Standard programs, and may address other related matters.
Text of proposed rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained by filing a Document Request Form (F-96) located on our website http://www.dps.ny.gov/f96dir.htm. For questions, contact:
Deborah Swatling, Public Service Commission, 3 Empire State Plaza, Albany, New York 12223-1350, (518) 486-2659, email:
deborah.swatling@dps.ny.govData, views or arguments may be submitted to:
Kathleen H. Burgess, Secretary, Public Service Commission, 3 Empire State Plaza, Albany, New York 12223-1350, (518) 474-6530, email:
Secretary@dps.ny.govPublic comment will be received until:
45 days after publication of this notice.
Regulatory Impact Statement, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Rural Area Flexibility Analysis and Job Impact Statement
Statements and analyses are not submitted with this notice because the proposed rule is within the definition contained in section 102(2)(a)(ii) of the State Administrative Procedure Act.