Home » 2011 Issues » June 08, 2011 » INS-23-11-00001-E Standards for the Management of the New York State Retirement Systems
INS-23-11-00001-E Standards for the Management of the New York State Retirement Systems
6/8/11 N.Y. St. Reg. INS-23-11-00001-E
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XXXIII, ISSUE 23
June 08, 2011
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
INSURANCE DEPARTMENT
EMERGENCY RULE MAKING
I.D No. INS-23-11-00001-E
Filing No. 452
Filing Date. May. 19, 2011
Effective Date. May. 19, 2011
Standards for the Management of the New York State Retirement Systems
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
Action taken:
Amendment of Part 136 (Regulation No. 85) of Title 11 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
Insurance Law, sections 201, 301, 314, 7401(a) and 7402(n)
Finding of necessity for emergency rule:
Preservation of general welfare.
Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity:
The Second Amendment to Regulation 85 (11 NYCRR 136), effective November 19, 2008, established new standards of behavior with regard to investment of the Common Retirement Fund's assets, conflicts of interest, and procurement. In addition, it created new audit and actuarial committees, and greatly strengthened the investment advisory committee. The Second Amendment also set high ethical standards, strengthened internal controls and governance, enhanced the operational transparency of the Fund, and strengthened supervision by the Insurance Department.
Nevertheless, recent events surrounding how placement agents conduct business on behalf of their clients with regard to the Fund compel the Superintendent to conclude that the mere strengthening of the Fund's control environment is insufficient to protect the integrity of the state employees' retirement systems. Rather, only an immediate ban on the use of placement agents will ensure sufficient protection of the Fund's members and beneficiaries and safeguard the integrity of the Fund's investments.
This regulation was previously promulgated on an emergency basis on June 18, 2009, September 16, 2009, January 5, 2010, April 2, 2010, May 28,2010, July 29,2010, September 23,2010, November 19,2010, January 18, 201], and March 21, 2011. The Department is currently working with the Governor's Office to make additional revisions to the regulation.
In the interim, this version of Regulation No. 85 needs to remain effective for the general welfare.
Subject:
Standards for the management of the New York State Retirement Systems.
Purpose:
To ban the use of placement agents by investment advisors engaged by the state employees retirement system.
Text of emergency rule:
Section 136-2.2 is amended to read as follows:
§ 136-2.2 Definitions.
The following words and phrases, as used in this Subpart, unless a different meaning is plainly required by the context, shall have the following meanings:
[(a) Retirement system shall mean the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System and the New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System.]
[(b) Fund shall mean the New York State Common Retirement Fund, a fund in the custody of the Comptroller as trustee, established pursuant to Section 422 of the Retirement and Social Security Law, which holds the assets of the retirement system.]
[(c)](a) Comptroller shall mean the Comptroller of the State of New York in his capacity as administrative head of the Retirement System and the sole trustee of the [fund] Fund
[(d) OSC shall mean the Office of the State Comptroller.]
[(e)](b) Consultant or advisor shall mean any person (other than an OSC employee) or entity retained by the [fund] Fund to provide technical or professional services to the [fund] Fund relating to investments by the [fund] Fund, including outside investment counsel and litigation counsel, custodians, administrators, broker-dealers, and persons or entities that identify investment objectives and risks, assist in the selection of [money] investment managers, securities, or other investments, or monitor investment performance.
(c) Family member shall mean any person living in the same household as the Comptroller, and any person related to the Comptroller within the third degree of consanguinity or affinity.
(d) Fund shall mean the New York State Common Retirement Fund, a fund in the custody of the Comptroller as trustee, established pursuant to Section 422 of the Retirement and Social Security Law ("RSSL"), which holds the assets of the Retirement System.
[f] (e) Investment manager shall mean any person (other than an OSC employee) or entity engaged by the Fund in the management of part or all of an investment portfolio of the [fund] Fund. "Management" shall include, but is not limited to, analysis of portfolio holdings, and the purchase, sale, and lending thereof. For the purposes hereof, any investment made by the Fund pursuant to RSSL § 177(7) shall be deemed to be the investment of the Fund in such investment entity (rather than in the assets of such investment entity).
(f) Investment policy statement shall mean a written document that, consistent with law, sets forth a framework for the investment program of the Fund.
(g) OSC shall mean the Office of the State Comptroller.
[(g)] (h) Placement agent or intermediary shall mean any person or entity, including registered lobbyists, directly or indirectly engaged and compensated by an investment manager (other than [an] a regular employee of the investment manager) to promote investments to or solicit investment by [assist the investment manager in obtaining investments by the fund, or otherwise doing business with] the [fund] Fund, whether compensated on a flat fee, a contingent fee, or any other basis. Regular employees of an investment manager are excluded from this definition unless they are employed principally for the purpose of securing or influencing the decision to secure a particular transaction or investment by the Fund. [obtaining investments or providing other intermediary services with respect to the fund.] For purpose of this paragraph, the term "employee" shall include any person who would qualify as an employee under the federal Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, but shall not include a person hired, retained or engaged by an investment manager to secure or influence the decision to secure a particular transaction or investment by the Fund.
[(h) Investment policy statement shall mean a written document that, consistent with law, sets forth a framework for the investment program of the fund.]
[(i) Third party administrator shall mean any person or entity that contractually provides administrative services to the retirement system, including receiving and recording employer and employee contributions, maintaining eligibility rosters, verifying eligibility for benefits or paying benefits and maintaining any other retirement system records. Administrative services do not include services provided to the fund relating to fund investments.]
(i) Retirement System shall mean the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System and the New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System.
(j) Third party administrator shall mean any person or entity that contractually provides administrative services to the Retirement System, including receiving and recording employer and employee contributions, maintaining eligibility rosters, verifying eligibility for benefits, paying benefits or maintaining any other Retirement System records. "Administrative services" do not include services provided to the Fund relating to Fund investments.
[(j)] (k) Unaffiliated Person shall mean any person other than: (1) the Comptroller or a family member of the Comptroller, (2) an officer or employee of OSC, (3) an individual or entity doing business with OSC or the [fund] Fund, or (4) an individual or entity that has a substantial financial interest in an entity doing business with OSC or the [fund] Fund. For the purpose of this paragraph, the term "substantial financial interest" shall mean the control of the entity, whereby "control" means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the entity, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract (except a commercial contract for goods or non-management services) or otherwise; but no individual shall be deemed to control an entity solely by reason of his being an officer or director of such entity. Control shall be presumed to exist if any individual directly or indirectly owns, controls or holds with the power to vote ten percent or more of the voting securities of such entity.
[(k) Family member shall mean any person living in the same household as the Comptroller, and any person related to the Comptroller within the third degree of consanguinity or affinity.]
Section 136-2.4 (d) is amended to read as follows:
(d) Placement agents or intermediaries: In order to preserve the independence and integrity of the [fund] Fund, to [address] preclude potential conflicts of interest, and to assist the Comptroller in fulfilling his or her duties as a fiduciary to the [fund] Fund, [the Comptroller shall maintain a reporting and review system that must be followed whenever the fund] the Fund shall not [engages, hires, invests with, or commits] engage, hire, invest with or commit to[,] an outside investment manager who is using the services of a placement agent or intermediary to assist the investment manager in obtaining investments by the [fund] Fund. [, or otherwise doing business with the fund. The Comptroller shall require investment managers to disclose to the Comptroller and to his or her designee payments made to any such placement agent or intermediary. The reporting and review system shall be set forth in written guidelines and such guidelines shall be published on the OSC public website.]
Section 136-2.5 (g) is amended to read as follows:
(g) The Comptroller shall:
(1) file with the superintendent an annual statement in the format prescribed by Section 307 of the Insurance Law, including the [retirement system's] Retirement System's financial statement, together with an opinion of an independent certified public accountant on the financial statement;
(2) file with the superintendent the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report within the time prescribed by law, but no later than the time it is published on the OSC public website;
(3) disclose on the OSC public website, on at least an annual basis, all fees paid by the [fund] Fund to investment managers, consultants or advisors, and third party administrators;
[(4) disclose on the OSC public website, on at least an annual basis, instances where an investment manager has paid a fee to a placement agent or intermediary;]
[(5)](4) disclose on the OSC public website the [fund's] Fund's investment policies and procedures; and
[(6)](5) require fiduciary and conflict of interest reviews of the [fund] Fund every three years by a qualified unaffiliated person.
This notice is intended
to serve only as a notice of emergency adoption. This agency intends to adopt this emergency rule as a permanent rule and will publish a notice of proposed rule making in the State Register at some future date. The emergency rule will expire August 16, 2011.
Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
David Neustadt, New York State Insurance Department, 25 Beaver Street, New York, NY 10004, (212) 480-5265, email: dneustad@ins.state.ny.us
Regulatory Impact Statement
1. Statutory authority: The Superintendent's authority for promulgation of this rule derives from sections 201, 301, 314, 7401(a), and 7402(n) of the Insurance Law.
Sections 201 and 301 of the Insurance Law authorize the Superintendent to effectuate any power accorded to him by the Insurance Law, and to prescribe regulations interpreting the Insurance Law.
Section 314 vests the Superintendent with the authority to promulgate standards with respect to administrative efficiency, discharge of fiduciary responsibilities, investment policies and financial soundness of the public retirement and pension systems of the State of New York, and to make an examination into the affairs of every system at least once every five years in accordance with sections 310, 311 and 312 of the Insurance Law. The implementation of the standards is necessarily through the promulgation of regulations.
As confirmed by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Dinallo v. DiNapoli, 9 N.Y. 3d 94 (2007), the Superintendent functions in two distinct capacities. The first is as regulator of the insurance industry. The second is as a statutory receiver of financially distressed insurance entities. Article 74 of the Insurance Law sets forth the Superintendent's role and responsibilities in this latter capacity.
Section 7401(a) sets forth the entities, including the public retirement systems, to which Article 74 applies.
Section 7402(n) provides that it is a ground for rehabilitation if an entity subject to Article 74 has failed or refused to take such steps as may be necessary to remove from office any officer or director whom the Superintendent has found, after appropriate notice and hearing, to be a dishonest or untrustworthy person.
2. Legislative objectives: Section 314 of the Insurance Law authorizes the Superintendent to promulgate and amend, after consultation with the respective administrative heads of public retirement and pension systems and after a public hearing, standards with respect to the public retirement and pension systems of the State of New York.
This amendment, which in effect bans the use of an investment tool that has been found to be untrustworthy, is consistent with the public policy objectives that the Legislature sought to advance in enacting Section 314, which provides the Superintendent with the powers to promulgate standards to protect the New York State Common Retirement Fund (the "Fund").
3. Needs and benefits: The Second Amendment to Regulation 85 (11 NYCRR 136), effective November 19, 2008, established new standards with regard to investment of the assets of the New York State Common Retirement Fund ("the Fund"), conflicts of interest and procurement. In addition, the Second Amendment created new audit and actuarial committees, and greatly strengthened the investment advisory committee. The Second Amendment also set high ethical standards, strengthened internal controls and governance, enhanced the operational transparency of the Fund, and strengthened supervision by the Insurance Department.
Nevertheless, recent allegations regarding "pay to play" practices, whereby politically connected individuals reportedly sold access to investment opportunities with the Fund, compel the Superintendent to conclude that the mere strengthening of the Fund's control environment is insufficient to protect the integrity of the state employees' retirement systems. The Third Amendment to Regulation 85 will adopt an immediate ban on the use of placement agents to ensure sufficient protection of the Fund's members and beneficiaries, and safeguard the integrity of the Fund's investments. Further, the amendment defines "placement agent or intermediary" in a manner that both thwarts evasion of the ban while ensuring that such ban not extend to persons otherwise acting lawfully on behalf of investment managers.
4. Costs: The rule does not impose any additional requirements on the Comptroller, and no additional costs are expected to result from the implementation of the ban imposed by this amendment. There are no costs to the Insurance Department or other state government agencies or local governments. Investment managers, consultants and advisors who provide services to the Fund, which are required to discontinue the use of placement agents in connection with investment services they provide to the Fund, may lose opportunities to do business with the Fund.
5. Local government mandates: The amendment imposes no new programs, services, duties or responsibilities on any county, city, town, village, school district, fire district or other special district.
6. Paperwork: No additional paperwork should result from the prohibition imposed by the amendment.
7. Duplication: This amendment will not duplicate any existing state or federal rule.
8. Alternatives: The Superintendent considered other ways to limit the influence of placement agents, including a partial ban, increased disclosure requirements, and adopting alternative definitions of placement agent or intermediary. The Department considered limiting the ban to include intent on the part of the party using placement agents, or defining "placement agent" in more general terms.
In developing the rule, the Superintendent and State Comptroller not only consulted with one another, but also briefed representatives of: (1) New York State and New York City Public Employee Unions; (2) New York City Retirement and Pension Funds; (3) the Borough Presidents of the five counties of New York City; and (4) officials of the New York City Mayor's Office, Comptroller's Office and Finance Department. These entities agreed with the concerns expressed by the Department and intend to explore remedies most appropriate to the pension funds that they represent.
Initially, the Superintendent concluded that only an immediate total ban on the use of placement agents could provide sufficient protection of the Fund's members and beneficiaries and safeguard the integrity of the Fund's investments. A Public Hearing was held on April 28, 2010. The following comments were received:
Blackstone Group, a global investment manager and financial advisor, wrote to oppose the proposed ban on the use of placement agents by investment advisors engaged by the New York State Common Retirement Fund ("The Fund"). It stated that the rule would lessen the number of investment opportunities brought before the Fund, adversely affect small, medium-sized and women- and minority-owned investment firms seeking to do business with the Fund, and adversely affect a number of New York-headquartered financial institutions doing business as placement agents.
Blackstone suggested the inclusion of the following provisions in the rule instead:
• A ban on political contributions by any employee of any placement agent seeking to do business with the fund;
• A requirement that any placement agent seeking do to business with the Fund be registered as a broker dealer with the SEC and ensure that its professionals have passed the appropriate Series qualifications administered by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA");
• A requirement that any placement agent seeking to do business in New York register with the Insurance Department; and
• A requirement that any placement agent representing an investment manager before the Fund fully disclose the contractual arrangement between it and the manager, including the fee arrangement and the scope of services to be provided.
The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association ("SIFMA"), representing hundreds of securities firms, banks, and asset managers, commented that the proposed rule (1) inadvertently limits the access of smaller fund managers to the Fund; (2) restricts the number and types of advisers that could be utilized by the Fund; (3) creates an inherent conflict between federal and state law that would make it impossible to do business with the Fund while complying with both; and (4) adds duplicative regulation in an area already substantially regulated at the state level and that is primed for further federal regulation through the imminent imposition of a federal pay-to-play regime on all registered broker-dealers acting as placement agents. In addition, SIFMA provided language that it believes would be consistent with the existing federal requirements on the use of placement agents. SIFMA requested that the Department either exclude from the proposed rule those placement agents who are registered as broker-dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or delay the enactment of the proposed rule until the federal and state placement agent initiatives are finalized.
The Department does not have jurisdiction over placement agents, which makes it difficult to implement and enforce requirements on them. The Superintendent did consider other ways to limit the influence of placement agents, including a partial ban, increased disclosure requirements, and adopting alternative definitions of placement agent or intermediary. The Department considered limiting the ban to include intent on the part of the party using placement agents, or defining "placement agent" in more general terms. At the time, the Superintendent concluded that only an immediate, total ban on the use of placement agents could provide sufficient protection of the Fund's members and beneficiaries and safeguard the integrity of the Fund's investments.
9. Federal standards: The Securities and Exchange Commission issued a "Pay-To-Play" regulation for financial advisors on July 1, 2010, which may have an impact on the issues addressed in the proposed rule.
10. Compliance schedule: The emergency adoption of this regulation on June 18, 2009 ensured that the ban would become enforceable immediately. The ban needs to remain in effect on an emergency basis until such time as an amended regulation can be made permanent.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
1. Effect of the rule: This amendment strengthens standards for the management of the New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System and New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System (collectively, "the Retirement System"), and the New York State Common Retirement Fund ("the Fund").
The Second Amendment to Regulation 85 (11 NYCRR 136), effective November 19, 2008, established new standards with regard to investment of the assets of the New York State Common Retirement Fund ("the Fund"), conflicts of interest and procurement. In addition, the Second Amendment created new audit and actuarial committees, and greatly strengthened the investment advisory committee. The Second Amendment also set high ethical standards, strengthened internal controls and governance, enhanced the operational transparency of the Fund, and strengthened supervision by the Insurance Department.
Nevertheless, recent allegations regarding "pay to play" practices, whereby politically connected individuals reportedly sold access to investment opportunities with the Fund, compel the Superintendent to conclude that the mere strengthening of the Fund's control environment is insufficient to protect the integrity of the state employees' retirement systems. The Third Amendment to Regulation 85 will adopt an immediate ban on the use of placement agents to ensure sufficient protection of the Fund's members and beneficiaries, and safeguard the integrity of the Fund's investments. Further, the amendment defines "placement agent or intermediary" in a manner that both thwarts evasion of the ban while ensuring that such ban not extend to persons otherwise acting lawfully on behalf of investment managers.
These standards are intended to assure that the conduct of the business of the Retirement System and the Fund, and of the State Comptroller (as administrative head of the Retirement System and as sole trustee of the Fund), are consistent with the principles specified in the rule. Most among all affected parties, the State Comptroller, as a fiduciary whose responsibilities are clarified and broadened, is impacted by the amendment. The State Comptroller is not a "small business" as defined in section 102(8) of the State Administrative Procedure Act.
This amendment will affect investment managers and other intermediaries (other than OSC employees) who provide technical or professional services to the Fund related to Fund investments. The proposal will prohibit investment managers from using the services of a placement agent unless such agent is a regular employee of the investment manager and is acting in a broader capacity than just providing specific investment advice to the Fund. In addition, the amendment is also directed to placement agents, who as a result of this proposal, will no longer be engaged directly or indirectly by investment managers that do business with the Fund. Some investment managers and placement agents may come within the definition of "small business" set forth in section 102(8) of the State Administrative Procedure Act, because they are independently owned and operated, and employ 100 or fewer individuals.
The amendment bans the use of placement agents in connection with investments by the Fund. This may adversely affect the business of placement agents, who will lose opportunities to earn profits in connection with investments by the Fund. Nevertheless, as a result of recent allegations regarding "pay to play" practices, whereby politically connected individuals reportedly sold access to investment opportunities with the Fund, the Superintendent has concluded that an immediate ban on the use of placement agents is necessary to protect the Fund's members and beneficiaries and to safeguard the integrity of the Fund's investments.
This amendment will not impose any adverse compliance requirements or result in any adverse impacts on local governments. The basis for this finding is that this amendment is directed at the State Comptroller; employees of the Office of State Comptroller; and investment managers, placement agents, consultant or advisors - none of which are local governments.
2. Compliance requirements: None.
3. Professional services: Investment managers, consultants and advisors who provide services to the fund, and are required to discontinue the use of placement agents in connection with investment services they provide to the Fund, may need to employ other professional services.
4. Compliance costs: The rule does not impose any additional requirements on the Comptroller, and no additional costs are expected to result from the implementation of the ban imposed by this amendment. There are no costs to the Insurance Department or other state government agencies or local governments. However, investment managers, consultants and advisors who provide services to the fund, which are required to discontinue the use of placement agents in connection with investment services they provide to the Fund, may lose opportunities to do business with the Fund.
5. Economic and technological feasibility: The rule does not impose any economic and technological requirements on affected parties, except for placement agents who will lose the opportunity to earn profits in connection with investments by the Fund.
6. Minimizing adverse impact: The costs to placement agents are lost opportunities to earn profits in connection with investments by the Fund. The Superintendent considered other ways to limit the influence of placement agents, including a partial ban, increased disclosure requirements, and adopting alternative definitions of placement agent or intermediary. But in the end, the Superintendent concluded that only an immediate total ban on the use of placement agents could provide sufficient protection of the Fund's members and beneficiaries and safeguard the integrity of the Fund's investments.
7. Small business and local government participation: In developing the rule, the Superintendent and State Comptroller not only consulted with one another, but also briefed representatives of: (1) New York State and New York City Public Employee Unions; (2) New York City Retirement and Pension Funds; (3) the Borough Presidents of the five counties of New York City; and (4) officials of the New York City Mayor's Office, Comptroller's Office and Finance Department.
A public hearing was held on April 28, 2010. Comments were received from two entities recommending that the total ban on the use of placement agents be modified. The Department will continue to assess the comments that have been received and any others that may be submitted.
Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
1. Types and estimated numbers of rural areas: Investment managers, placement agents, consultants or advisors that do business in rural areas as defined under State Administrative Procedure Act Section 102(13) will be affected by this proposal. The amendment bans the use of placement agents in connection with investments by the New York State Common Retirement Fund ("the Fund"), which may adversely affect the business of placement agents and of other entities that utilize placement agents and are involved in Fund investments.
2. Reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance requirements, and professional services: This amendment will not impose any reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements on public or private entities in rural areas, with the exception of requiring investment managers, consultants and advisors who provide services to the fund to discontinue the use of placement agents.
3. Costs: The costs to placement agents are lost opportunities to earn profits in connection with investments by the Fund.
4. Minimizing adverse impact: The amendment does not adversely impact rural areas.
5. Rural area participation: A public hearing was held on April 28, 2010. Comments were received from two entities recommending that the total ban on the use of placement agents be modified. The Department will continue to assess the comments that have been received and any others that may be submitted.
Job Impact Statement
The Insurance Department finds that this rule will have little or no impact on jobs and employment opportunities. The amendment bans investment managers from using placement agents in connection with investments by the New York State Common Retirement Fund ("the Fund"). The amendment may adversely affect the business of placement agents, who could lose the opportunity to earn profits in connection with investments by the Fund. Nevertheless, in view of recent events about how placement agents conduct business on behalf of their clients with regard to the Fund, the Superintendent has concluded that an immediate ban on the use of placement agents is necessary to protect the Fund's members and beneficiaries, and to safeguard the integrity of the Fund's investments.
Assessment of Public Comments
Comments that were received as a result of the Public Hearing held on April 28, 2010:
Blackstone Group, a global investment manager and financial advisor, wrote to oppose the proposed ban on the use of placement agents by investment advisors engaged by the New York State Common Retirement Fund ("The Fund"). It stated that the rule would lessen the number of investment opportunities brought before the Fund, adversely affect small, medium-sized and women- and minority-owned investment firms seeking to do business with the Fund, and adversely affect a number of New York-headquartered financial institutions doing business as placement agents.
Blackstone suggested the inclusion of the following provisions in the rule instead:
• A ban on political contributions by any employee of any placement agent seeking to do business with the fund;
• A requirement that any placement agent seeking do to business with the Fund be registered as a broker dealer with the SEC and ensure that its professionals have passed the appropriate Series qualifications administered by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA");
• A requirement that any placement agent seeking to do business in New York register with the Insurance Department; and
• A requirement that any placement agent representing an investment manager before the Fund fully disclose the contractual arrangement between it and the manager, including the fee arrangement and the scope of services to be provided.
The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association ("SIFMA"), representing hundreds of securities firms, banks, and asset managers, commented that the proposed rule (1) inadvertently limits the access of smaller fund managers to the Fund; (2) restricts the number and types of advisers that could be utilized by the Fund; (3) creates an inherent conflict between federal and state law that would make it impossible to do business with the Fund while complying with both; and (4) adds duplicative regulation in an area already substantially regulated at the state level and that is primed for further federal regulation through the imminent imposition of a federal pay-to-play regime on all registered broker-dealers acting as placement agents. In addition, SIFMA provided language that it believes would be consistent with the existing federal requirements on the use of placement agents. SIFMA requested that the Department either exclude from the proposed rule those placement agents who are registered as broker-dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or delay the enactment of the proposed rule until the federal and state placement agent initiatives are finalized.
The Department does not have jurisdiction over placement agents, which makes it difficult to implement and enforce requirements on them. The Superintendent did consider other ways to limit the influence of placement agents, including a partial ban, increased disclosure requirements, and adopting alternative definitions of placement agent or intermediary. The Department considered limiting the ban to include intent on the part of the party using placement agents, or defining "placement agent" in more general terms. At the time, the Superintendent concluded that only an immediate, total ban on the use of placement agents could provide sufficient protection of the Fund's members and beneficiaries and safeguard the integrity of the Fund's investments.
The Department met with representatives from SIFMA on June 28th to gain further understanding of some of the issues raised in opposition to the proposed rule. We subsequently requested additional information from SIFMA. SIFMA provided the Department with additional information based upon actions taken and/or contemplated by pension fund regulators in other States. The Department will continue to assess the comments that have been received and any other information that may be submitted.
The Department is also evaluating the extent to which its proposed rule conforms with the Securities and Exchange Commission's "Pay-To-Play" regulation for financial advisors that was issued on July 1, 2010. This regulation is effective on September 13, 2010, with full compliance by March 14, 2011 for all affected investment advisers.
We are continuing to research best practices in use with large U.S. public pension funds before any further action will be taken with regards to the proposed rule. A number of policies/practices being researched include limits on the amount of business that may be placed through any single placement agent, and the feasibility of monetary penalties for investment managers/advisors who seek to circumvent procedures that are established to mitigate the risk of undue influence by politically connected persons.
