TAF-23-16-00003-P Fuel Use Tax on Motor Fuel and Diesel Motor Fuel and the Art. 13-A Carrier Tax Jointly Administered Therewith

6/8/16 N.Y. St. Reg. TAF-23-16-00003-P

NEW YORK STATE REGISTER

VOLUME XXXVIII, ISSUE 23

June 08, 2016

RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES

DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE

PROPOSED RULE MAKING

NO HEARING(S) SCHEDULED

 

I.D No. TAF-23-16-00003-P

Fuel Use Tax on Motor Fuel and Diesel Motor Fuel and the Art. 13-A Carrier Tax Jointly Administered Therewith

PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following proposed rule:

Proposed Action:

Amendment of section 492.1(b)(1) of Title 20 NYCRR.

Statutory authority:

Tax Law, sections 171, subd. First, 301-h(c), 509(7), 523(b) and 528(a)

Subject:

Fuel use tax on motor fuel and diesel motor fuel and the art. 13-A carrier tax jointly administered therewith.

Purpose:

To set the sales tax component and the composite rate per gallon for the period July 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016.

Text of proposed rule:

Section 1. Paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of section 492.1 of such regulations is amended by adding a new subparagraph (lxxxiii) to read as follows:

Motor Fuel			Diesel Motor Fuel
Sales Tax	Composite	Aggregate	Sales Tax	Composite	Aggregate
Component	Rate	Rate	Component	Rate	Rate
(lxxxii) April-June 2016
13.7	21.7	38.7	14.9	22.9	38.15
(lxxxiii) July-September 2016
13.6	21.6	38.6	14.5	22.5	37.75

Text of proposed rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:

Kathleen D. O'Connell, Tax Regulations Specialist, Department of Taxation and Finance, Office of Counsel, Building 9, W.A. Harriman Campus, Albany, NY 12227, [phone], email: [e-mail]

Data, views or arguments may be submitted to:

Same as above.

Public comment will be received until:

45 days after publication of this notice.

Regulatory Impact Statement, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Rural Area Flexibility Analysis and Job Impact Statement

Statements and analyses are not submitted with this notice because the proposed rule is within the definition contained in section 102(2)(a)(ii) of the State Administrative Procedure Act.