EDU-23-10-00002-EP Relates to the Establishment of a Clinically Rich Graduate Level Principal Preparation Program  

  • 6/9/10 N.Y. St. Reg. EDU-23-10-00002-EP
    NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
    VOLUME XXXII, ISSUE 23
    June 09, 2010
    RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
    EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
    EMERGENCY/PROPOSED RULE MAKING
    NO HEARING(S) SCHEDULED
     
    I.D No. EDU-23-10-00002-EP
    Filing No. 545
    Filing Date. May. 25, 2010
    Effective Date. May. 25, 2010
    Relates to the Establishment of a Clinically Rich Graduate Level Principal Preparation Program
    PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
    Proposed Action:
    Addition of sections 52.1(a)(6) and 52.21(c)(7) to Title 8 NYCRR.
    Statutory authority:
    Education Law, sections 207, 208, 210, 214, 216, 224, 305(1), (2), (7), 3004(1) and 3006(1)
    Finding of necessity for emergency rule:
    Preservation of general welfare.
    Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity:
    The proposed amendment is designed to 1) address immediate personnel shortages of effective school building leaders in New York's high need schools and school districts; and 2) promote student growth and achievement through strong educational leadership.
    Research studies show that school leaders are critical to helping improve student performance and preparation programs grounded in intensive clinical experiences prepare effective school leaders (Educational Leadership Policy Standards, 2008). To maximize student growth and achievement in high need schools, the Department will select program providers for graduate level clinically rich principal preparation pilot programs through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process.
    In order to ensure that any program selected to offer a clinically rich principal preparation program is of high quality, the Board of Regents will establish a Blue Ribbon Commission to evaluate all applications. This Blue Ribbon Commission will be comprised of highly renowned teacher educators. The Blue Ribbon Commission will make recommendations to the Board of Regents for those programs that should be authorized to establish clinically rich principal preparation programs, both from collegiate and non-collegiate providers or in combination. The goal is to create a process that will ensure a rigorous programmatic review and to select only the highest quality providers to assist in the preparation of principals for our high need schools.
    To participate in the clinically rich principal preparation program, program providers will be required to meet certain eligibility requirements, including written collaboration agreements with high need schools, faculty, curriculum, mentoring and training requirements.
    In order to fill the personnel shortages for effective school building leaders in high need schools in the 2011-2012 school year, an emergency action is necessary for the preservation of the general welfare in order to timely implement the provisions of the proposed amendment to provide school districts and BOCES with timely notice of the eligibility requirements and the program registration requirements for the pilot program and to complete the competitive bidding process for the selection of program providers before the 2011-2012 school year.
    It is anticipated that the proposed amendment will be presented to the Board of Regents for adoption as a permanent rule at its September 14, 2010 meeting, which is the first scheduled meeting after the expiration of the 45-day public comment period mandated by the State Administrative Procedures Act.
    Subject:
    Relates to the establishment of a clinically rich graduate level principal preparation program.
    Purpose:
    Establishes the program registration standards for the clinically rich principal preparation program.
    Text of emergency/proposed rule:
    1. Paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of section 52.1 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education is added, effective May 25, 2010, as follows:
    (6) every curriculum leading to certification as a school building leader in a clinically rich graduate level principal preparation pilot program as prescribed under section 52.21(c)(7) of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education.
    2. A new paragraph (7) of subdivision (c) of section 52.21 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education is added, effective May 25, 2010, as follows:
    (7) Clinically rich graduate level principal preparation pilot program for high need schools.
    (i) Purpose. The purpose of this paragraph is to establish a clinically rich graduate level principal preparation pilot program to increase the supply of highly effective principals in high need schools. This pilot program will include an intensive clinical component, grounded in the standards of the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) and centered on the practice of research-based school leadership skills and best practices that lead to strong educational leadership and increased student achievement.
    (ii) Limitations. The clinically rich graduate level principal preparation pilot program shall end on June 30, 2016.
    (iii) Definitions. For purposes of this paragraph:
    (a) High need school shall mean a school designated by the Commissioner of Education as a high need school. A high need school shall include, but not be limited to, schools under registration review, low performing schools, and other high need schools approved by the Board of Regents for purposes of this program.
    (b) Institution shall mean an institution of higher education as defined in section 50.1 of this Title, an education corporation as defined in Education Law section 216-a, or a corporation having an educational purpose that is formed under the Not-for-Profit Corporation Law or the Business Corporation Law with the consent of the Commissioner pursuant to Education Law section 216, or a Limited Liability Company having an educational purpose that is formed under the Limited Liability Company Law with the consent of the Commissioner under Education Law section 216, and such institution must be selected by the Board of Regents for participation in these pilot programs pursuant to a request for proposal ("RFP") process. Such proposals shall meet the criteria outlined by the Board of Regents in the RFP and be in a format, and submitted pursuant to a timeline, as prescribed by the Board of Regents.
    (c) Principal-mentor shall mean an experienced and highly effective principal who holds a certificate as a school building leader and is selected through collaboration between the program provider and the school district and is assigned to provide mentoring and support to a candidate in this pilot program.
    (iv) General requirements for the clinically rich graduate level pilot program. The general registration requirements set forth in sections 52.1 and 52.2 of this Part,the general requirements for registration of programs leading to certification in the educational leadership service as set forth in sections 52.21(c)(1)(ii),(iii) and (iv) of this Part and the institutional accountability requirements set forth in section 52.21(c)(6) of this Part shall apply. The requirements set forth in section 52.21(c)(2) of this Part shall not be applicable, except as otherwise provided in this paragraph.
    (v) Specific requirements for the clinically rich graduate level principal preparation pilot programs. The following requirements shall be met:
    (a) Collaboration. Any institution that participates in this program shall execute a written agreement with each partnering high need school which shall include the following:
    (1) the specific roles of the institution and the high need school in the recruitment, preparation, and mentoring of candidates, as well as their roles in sustaining this pilot program in the long term;
    (2) the selection and evaluation criteria and the recruitment process for principal-mentors;
    (3) a commitment to actively recruit and select candidates who demonstrate excellence in teaching, experience working as advocates for children and families in high need schools, leadership capability, and a sincere intent to serve as instructional leaders;
    (4) the various types of assessments that will be used to evaluate candidates throughout the program, and how such assessments will be utilized to prescribe study and authentic, real-world experiences that will enable candidates to develop the knowledge, understanding, and skills necessary to successfully meet the requirements of this program, provide effective leadership in high need schools and to obtain certification upon completion of the program.
    (b) Admission requirements. In addition to the selection criteria established by institutions for candidates to participate in this program, the pilot program shall meet the following admission requirements:
    (1) The program shall require candidates to hold a baccalaureate or graduate degree from a regionally accredited higher education institution or an equivalently approved higher education institution as determined by the department. Candidates shall have achieved at least a 3.0 cumulative grade point average, or its equivalent, in the program leading to the baccalaureate or graduate degree, or shall have been found by an officer designated by the registered program to have the necessary knowledge and skills to successfully complete the program, which finding shall be in writing and include the basis for that finding.
    (2) Candidates shall possess a permanent or professional certificate in the classroom teaching service or pupil personnel service, or to demonstrate the potential for instructional leadership based on prior experiences that are evaluated using criteria established by the program and uniformly applied. Institutions shall inform applicants in writing prior to admission that the State Education Department requires for the initial certificate as a school building leader that the candidate shall have successfully completed three years of classroom teaching service and/or pupil personnel service experience in public or non-public schools N-12.
    (3) Institutions shall require candidates to demonstrate the potential to become education leaders possessing the characteristics of effective leaders as a result of their prior experiences, including experiences as a teacher, administrator, or pupil personnel service provider.
    (4) Only those candidates who provide a written commitment to be a school building leader for at least four years in a high need school upon graduation shall be admitted into the program.
    (c) Instruction. Any instruction provided within the program shall reflect a deep understanding of adult learning principles, make appropriate use of technology, demonstrate effective instructional practices, be individualized based on the candidate's needs, and demonstrate the development of higher order cognitive processes.
    (d) Curriculum and the clinical experience component Completion of the curriculum and the clinical experience component of the program shall prepare the candidate with the education required for an initial certificate in the school building leader certificate title (principal, housemaster, supervisor, department chair, assistant principal, coordinator, unit head, and any other person serving more than 10 periods per week of the assignment in an administrative or supervisory position, except school district leader or school district business leader).
    (1) Faculty. All faculty members who teach within a curriculum in this pilot program shall possess earned doctorates or other terminal degrees in the field in which they are teaching or shall have demonstrated, in other widely recognized ways, their special competence in the field in which they instruct graduate students.
    (2) Curriculum.
    (i) The curriculum of the pilot program shall include research-based skills and best practices aligned with the following six standards of the Educational Leadership Policy Standards: ISLLC 2008 to prepare candidates to be effective school building leaders in high need schools and promote the success of all students by:
    (A) facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by the school community;
    (B) advocating, nurturing and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth;
    (C) ensuring management of the organization, operations and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment;
    (D) collaborating with families and community members, responding to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources;
    (E) acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner; and
    (F) understanding, responding to, and influencing the larger political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context.
    (ii) In addition, the curriculum of the program shall meet the following requirements:
    (A) The curriculum shall be offered by qualified faculty who engage in regular professional development experiences to strengthen their own knowledge and skills, demonstrate recent highly effective leadership experience and an understanding of high needs schools and possess a commitment and dedication to the mission and guiding principles of this pilot program.
    (B) The curriculum shall effectively integrate technology, be intellectually challenging, reflect research on effective leadership and school improvement, and focus on improving the conditions that impact student learning and achievement.
    (C) The content requirements for the program shall include, but need not be limited to graduate level study designed to permit the candidate to obtain the content requirements for programs leading to an initial certificate as a school building leader, as prescribed in section 52.21(c)(2)(v) of this Part.
    (3) Clinically rich experience component. The clinical experience component of the program shall meet the following requirements:
    (i) The clinical experience shall be designed by the institution in collaboration with a high need school to provide a rich variety of school leadership experiences for its candidates to ensure that program graduates will be effective principals in high need schools.
    (ii) The clinical experience shall be woven throughout the pilot program and serve as the anchor, be developmental in nature, with increasing responsibilities progressing to independent leadership responsibilities and feature active authentic leadership experiences.
    (iii) The candidate shall complete the clinical experience component of this program under the mentorship of the assigned principal-mentor in a high need school.
    (iv) Prior to assigning the candidate to a school, the institution shall enter into a written agreement with the high need school wherein the high need school shall agree to establish a plan for at least one continuous school year of mentored clinical experience by the assigned principal-mentor for the candidate and support by a team comprised of program faculty, teachers and administrators at the high need school and the superintendent.
    (v) The program shall ensure its candidates receive mentoring support during the entire period they are assigned to the school and enrolled in the program, which shall be at least one continuous school year.
    (vi) Program faculty shall supervise the candidate and promote the linking of theory and practice by observing and advising the candidate at least twice each month during the clinical experience, except as otherwise provided in this paragraph.
    (vii) Program faculty shall work in collaboration with the assigned principal-mentor to evaluate candidates and provide feedback.
    (viii) During the clinical experience, the program shall provide courses and seminars that are designed to link educational theory with clinical experiences, which shall include, but need not be limited to, the curricula described in subclause (iv)(d)(2) of this paragraph.
    (e) Certification. A designated officer of the institution offering the pilot program shall be required to recommend the candidate for an initial certificate, upon completion of the program and after consultation with the principal-mentor.
    (f) Support commitment for pilot program graduates. An institution shall have a formal written agreement with partnering schools or districts to provide continued mentoring support for graduates of the pilot program during their first year in a school leadership position, which shall include, but not be limited to, setting selection criteria, and the recruitment and training processes for mentors; and developing plans to provide professional development programs based on research and best practices for mentors and school leaders.
    3. A new subclause (3) of clause (a) of subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) shall be added to Section 80-3.10 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education, effective May 25, 2010, as follows:
    (3) The candidate shall hold a baccalaureate or graduate degree from a regionally accredited higher education institution or an equivalently approved higher education institution as determined by the department and have successfully completed the clinically rich principal preparation pilot program leading to the initial certificate as a school building leader in the educational leadership service registered pursuant to section 52.21(c)(7) of this Title.
    This notice is intended:
    to serve as both a notice of emergency adoption and a notice of proposed rule making. The emergency rule will expire August 22, 2010.
    Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
    Christine Moore, NYS Education Department, 89 Washington Avenue, Room 148, Albany, NY 12234, (518) 473-8296, email: cmoore@mail.nysed.gov
    Data, views or arguments may be submitted to:
    Peg Rivers, New York State Education Department, 89 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12234, (518) 473-4921, email: privers@mail.nysed.gov
    Public comment will be received until:
    45 days after publication of this notice.
    Regulatory Impact Statement
    1. STATUTORY AUTHORITY:
    Section 207 of the Education Law grants general rule making authority to the Regents to carry into effect the laws and policies of the State relating to education.
    Section 210 of the Education Law grants to the Regents the authority to register domestic and foreign institutions in terms of New York standards.
    Subdivision (1) of section 305 of the Education Law empowers the Commissioner of Education to be the chief executive officer of the state system of education and authorizes the Commissioner to execute educational policies determined by the Regents.
    Subdivision (2) of section 305 of the Education Law authorizes the Commissioner of Education to have general supervision over all schools subject to the Education Law.
    Subdivision (2) of section 3001 of the Education Law establishes certification by the State Education Department as a qualification to teach in the State's public schools.
    Subdivision (1) of section 3004 of the Education Law authorizes the Commissioner of Education to prescribe, subject to the approval of the Regents, regulations governing the examination and certification of teachers employed in the State's public schools.
    Subdivision (2) of section 3007 of the Education Law authorizes the Commissioner of Education to endorse a certificate issued by another state.
    2. LEGISLATIVE OBJECTIVES:
    The proposed amendment carries out the objectives of the above-referenced statutes by modifying the requirements in the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education for principal preparation programs, by establishing a clinically rich pilot program.
    3. NEEDS AND BENEFITS:
    The purpose of creating the clinically rich pilot program is to address the retention issue in high need schools and improve student growth and achievement in high need schools. Research studies show that school leaders are critical to helping improve student performance and preparation programs that are grounded in intensive clinical experiences prepare effective school leaders. To maximize student growth and achievement in high need schools, the Department will select program providers for the clinically rich principal preparation pilot program through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process.
    In order to ensure that any program selected to offer a clinically rich principal preparation program is of high quality, the Board of Regents will establish a Blue Ribbon Commission to evaluate all applications. This Blue Ribbon Commission will be comprised of highly renowned teacher educators. The Blue Ribbon Commission will make recommendations to the Board of Regents for those programs that should be authorized to establish clinically rich principal preparation programs, from collegiate and non-collegiate providers or in partnerships. The goal is to create a process that will ensure a rigorous programmatic review and to select only the highest quality providers to assist in the preparation of principals for our high need schools. In addition, non-collegiate programs will be required to seek accreditation from an education preparation program accrediting body approved by the Board of Regents.
    The proposed amendment would authorize institutions, other than institutions of higher of education, to offer the graduate level clinically rich pilot program. Such institutions shall include, but not be limited to, cultural institutions, libraries, research centers, and other organizations with an educational mission that are selected by the Commissioner for participation through the RFP process.
    To prepare effective principals for high need schools, the graduate level clinically rich pilot program shall include at least one continuous school year of mentored clinical experience, centered on practicing research-based educational leadership skills. Pedagogical study linking theory and practice will be embedded in the clinical experience.
    4. COSTS:
    (a) Cost to State government: The amendment will not impose any additional cost on State government, including the State Education Department. The State Education Department will use existing staff and resources to select program providers for the pilot programs through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process.
    (b) Cost to local government: The proposed amendment is permissive in nature and only affects high need schools and school districts that wish to participate in a clinically rich pilot program. The proposed amendment requires such school districts to provide mentoring for the candidates in the pilot program. The State Education Department estimates that, on average, it will cost a school district about $6,200 for each candidate per year to provide the mentoring, while they are in the clinically rich pilot program.
    (c) Cost to private regulated parties. The proposed amendment is permissive in nature. The Department anticipates that institutions who elect to participate in this program will incur the same costs for the development and implementation of this program as they would for a traditional principal preparation program.
    (d) Costs to the regulatory agency: As stated above in Costs to State Government, the amendment does not impose any additional costs on the State Education Department. The Department anticipates that it will be able to use existing faculty and resources to approve these programs and for the selection of participating institutions.
    5. LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANDATES:
    Any institution that participates in this pilot program shall execute a written agreement with each partnering high need school which shall include the following: (1) the specific roles of the institution and the high need school in the recruitment, preparation, and mentoring of candidates, as well as their roles in sustaining this pilot program in the long term; (2) the selection and evaluation criteria and the recruitment process for principal-mentors; (3) a commitment to actively recruit and select candidates who demonstrate excellence in teaching, experience working as advocates for children and families in high need schools, leadership capability, and a sincere intent to serve as instructional leaders; (4) the various types of assessments that will be used to evaluate candidates throughout the program, and how such assessments will be utilized to prescribe study and experiences that will enable candidates to develop the knowledge, understanding, and skills necessary to successfully meet the requirements of this program and to obtain certification upon completion of the program.
    These institutions will also be required to enter into a written agreement with the high need school, prior to assigning the candidate to a classroom in such high need school, wherein the high need school must agree to establish a plan for at least one continuous school year of mentored clinical experience by an assigned principal-mentor and provide support by a team of program faculty, teachers and administrators at the high need school and the superintendent. Program faculty will also be required to supervise the candidate and promote the linking of theory and practice by observing and advising the candidate at least twice each month during the clinical experience and shall work in collaboration with the assigned principal-mentor to evaluate candidates and provide feedback. During the clinical experience component of the program, the institution shall also provide courses and seminars that are designed to link educational theory with clinical experiences.
    An institution that elects to participate in this program will also be required to have a formal written agreement with partnering schools or districts to provide continued mentoring support for graduates of the pilot program during their first year in a school leadership position, which shall include, but not be limited to, setting selection criteria, and the recruitment and training processes for mentors; and developing plans to provide research-based professional development programs for mentors and school leaders.
    6. PAPERWORK:
    See paperwork requirements listed in Section 5 above entitled "Local Government Mandates".
    7. DUPLICATION:
    The amendment does not duplicate other existing State or Federal requirements.
    8. ALTERNATIVES:
    There were no significant alternative proposals considered.
    9. FEDERAL STANDARDS:
    There are no Federal standards that address program registration requirements for principal preparation programs, qualifying individuals to be employed as a school building leader in the New York State public schools, the subject matter of this amendment.
    10. COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE:
    If adopted as an emergency measure at the may Regents meeting, the proposed amendment will become effective on May 25, 2010. A second emergency adoption will be necessary at the July Regents meeting to ensure that the regulations remain continuously in effect until the regulation becomes effective on October 6, 2010. It is unnecessary to delay implementation of the proposed amendment because of its permissive nature.
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
    a) Small Businesses:
    1. Effect of rule:
    The purpose of the proposed amendment is to establish program registration standards for a clinically rich pilot program and to authorize institutions, other than institutions of higher education, with an education mission and that are selected by the Board of Regents, to offer principal preparation programs under this pilot program. Some of these institutions may be small businesses.
    2. Compliance requirements:
    Any institution that participates in this pilot program shall execute a written agreement with each partnering high need school which shall include the following: (1) the specific roles of the institution and the high need school in the recruitment, preparation, and mentoring of candidates, as well as their roles in sustaining this pilot program in the long term; (2) the selection and evaluation criteria and the recruitment process for principal-mentors; (3) a commitment to actively recruit and select candidates who demonstrate excellence in teaching, experience working as advocates for children and families in high need schools, leadership capability, and a sincere intent to serve as instructional leaders; (4) the various types of assessments that will be used to evaluate candidates throughout the program, and how such assessments will be utilized to prescribe study and experiences that will enable candidates to develop the knowledge, understanding, and skills necessary to successfully meet the requirements of this program and to obtain certification upon completion of the program.
    These institutions will also be required to enter into a written agreement with the high need school, prior to assigning the candidate to a classroom in such high need school, wherein the high need school must agree to establish a plan for at least one continuous school year of mentored clinical experience by an assigned principal-mentor and provide support by a team of program faculty, teachers and administrators at the high need school and the superintendent. Program faculty will also be required to supervise the candidate and promote the linking of theory and practice by observing and advising the candidate at least twice each month during the clinical experience and shall work in collaboration with the assigned principal-mentor to evaluate candidates and provide feedback. During the clinical experience component of the program, the institution shall also provide courses and seminars that are designed to link educational theory with clinical experiences.
    An institution that elects to participate in this program will also be required to have a formal written agreement with partnering schools or districts to provide continued mentoring support for graduates of the pilot program during their first year in a school leadership position, which shall include, but not be limited to, setting selection criteria, and the recruitment and training processes for mentors; and developing plans to provide research-based professional development programs for mentors and school leaders.
    3. Professional services:
    The proposed amendment does not require small businesses to contract for additional professional services to comply.
    4. Compliance costs:
    The proposed amendment is permissive in nature and any costs associated with the proposed amendment only apply to institutions and high need schools that elect to participate in the pilot program. However, for each candidate in the pilot program, the State Education Department estimates that it will cost a high need school or school district that elects to participate in the program approximately $6,200 per year to provide mentoring. The Department also anticipates that for any institution that elects to participate in the pilot program, it will incur the same costs for the development and implementation of this program as they would for a traditional principal preparation program and that such institutions could use existing faculty to meet supervision requirements of the proposed amendment.
    5. Economic and technological feasibility:
    See above response to compliance costs. The proposed amendment would not require schools or school districts to secure special technology to comply.
    6. Minimizing adverse impact:
    As stated above, the proposed amendment is permissive in nature. It only applies to institutions that wish to participate in a graduate level clinically rich pilot program. Because of the nature of the proposed amendment, it is unnecessary to minimize adverse impacts on small businesses.
    7. Small business participation:
    The Department has shared the proposed amendment and sought input from the School Administrators Association of New York State, the New York State Federation of School Administrators, the Collegiate Association for Developing Educational Administrators, the Metropolitan Council for Educational Administration and the New York State Council of School Superintendents. These organizations have representatives from school districts across the State.
    b) Local Governments:
    1. Effect of rule:
    The purpose of the proposed amendment is to establish program registration standards for a clinically rich graduate level pilot program and to authorize institutions, other than institutions of higher education, that are selected by the Board of Regents, to offer teacher preparation programs under this pilot program. High need schools and school districts may opt to participate and collaborate with institutions that are selected by the Board of Regents to participate in this program.
    2. Compliance requirements:
    Any institution that participates in this pilot program shall execute a written agreement with each partnering high need school which shall include the following: (1) the specific roles of the institution and the high need school in the recruitment, preparation, and mentoring of candidates, as well as their roles in sustaining this pilot program in the long term; (2) the selection and evaluation criteria and the recruitment process for principal-mentors; (3) a commitment to actively recruit and select candidates who demonstrate excellence in teaching, experience working as advocates for children and families in high need schools, leadership capability, and a sincere intent to serve as instructional leaders; (4) the various types of assessments that will be used to evaluate candidates throughout the program, and how such assessments will be utilized to prescribe study and experiences that will enable candidates to develop the knowledge, understanding, and skills necessary to successfully meet the requirements of this program and to obtain certification upon completion of the program.
    These institutions will also be required to enter into a written agreement with the high need school, prior to assigning the candidate to a classroom in such high need school, wherein the high need school must agree to establish a plan for at least one continuous school year of mentored clinical experience by an assigned principal-mentor and provide support by a team of program faculty, teacher and administrators at the high need school and the superintendent. Program faculty will also be required to supervise the candidate and promote the linking of theory and practice by observing and advising the candidate at least twice each month during the clinical experience and shall work in collaboration with the assigned principal-mentor to evaluate candidates and provide feedback. During the clinical experience component of the program, the institution shall also provide courses and seminars that are designed to link educational theory with clinical experiences.
    An institution that elects to participate in this program will also be required to have a formal written agreement with partnering schools or districts to provide continued mentoring support for graduates of the pilot program during their first year in a school leadership position, which shall include, but not be limited to, setting selection criteria, and the recruitment and training processes for mentors; and developing plans to provide research-based professional development programs for mentors and school leaders.
    3. Professional services:
    The proposed amendment does not require schools or school districts to contract for additional professional services to comply.
    4. Compliance costs:
    The proposed amendment is permissive in nature and any costs associated with the proposed amendment only apply to institutions and high need schools that elect to participate in the pilot program. However, for each teacher certification candidate in the pilot program, the State Education Department estimates that it will cost a high need school or school district that elects to participate in the program approximately $6,200 per year to provide mentoring. The Department also anticipates that for any institution that elects to participate in the pilot program, it will incur the same costs for the development and implementation of this program as they would for a traditional principal preparation program and that such institutions could use existing faculty to meet the supervision requirements of the proposed amendment.
    5. Economic and technological feasibility:
    See above response to compliance costs. The proposed amendment would not require schools or school districts to secure special technology to comply.
    6. Minimizing adverse impact:
    The proposed amendment is expected to have a positive impact on high need schools and school districts by increasing the supply of highly effective teachers in high need subjects in high need schools. As stated above, the proposed amendment is permissive in nature. It only applies to high need schools and school districts that wish to participate in a clinically rich pilot program. Because of the nature of the proposed amendment, it is unnecessary to minimize adverse impacts on school districts.
    7. Local government participation:
    The Department has shared the proposed amendment and sought input from the School Administrators Association of New York State (SAANYS, the New York State Federation of School Administrators, the Collegiate Association for Developing Educational Administrators, the Metropolitan Council for Educational Administration and the New York State Council of School Superintendents (NYSCOSS). These organizations have representatives from school districts across the State.
    Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
    1. Types and estimate of number of rural areas:
    The proposed amendment will impact institutions that elect to offer a clinically rich principal preparation program, which may include colleges and universities and institutions other than institutions of higher education that are selected by the Board of Regents to participate in this program. Such institutions may include cultural institutions, libraries, research centers, and other organizations with an educational mission. The proposed amendment will also impact high need schools and school districts in New York State that elect to participate in this program. These high need schools and institutions may be located in the 44 rural counties with fewer than 200,000 habitants and the 71 towns and urban counties with a population density of 150 square miles or less.
    2. Reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance requirements and professional services:
    Any institution that participates in this pilot program shall execute a written agreement with each partnering high need school which shall include the following: (1) the specific roles of the institution and the high need school in the recruitment, preparation, and mentoring of candidates, as well as their roles in sustaining this pilot program in the long term; (2) the selection and evaluation criteria and the recruitment process for principal-mentors; (3) a commitment to actively recruit and select candidates who demonstrate excellence in teaching, experience working as advocates for children and families in high need schools, leadership capability, and a sincere intent to serve as instructional leaders; (4) the various types of assessments that will be used to evaluate candidates throughout the program, and how such assessments will be utilized to prescribe study and experiences that will enable candidates to develop the knowledge, understanding, and skills necessary to successfully meet the requirements of this program and to obtain certification upon completion of the program.
    These institutions will also be required to enter into a written agreement with the high need school, prior to assigning the candidate to a classroom in such high need school, wherein the high need school must agree to establish a plan for at least one continuous school year of mentored clinical experience by an assigned principal-mentor and provide support by a team of program faculty, teacher and administrators at the high need school and the superintendent. Program faculty will also be required to supervise the candidate and promote the linking of theory and practice by observing and advising the candidate at least twice each month during the clinical experience and shall work in collaboration with the assigned principal-mentor to evaluate candidates and provide feedback. During the clinical experience component of the program, the institution shall also provide courses and seminars that are designed to link educational theory with clinical experiences.
    An institution that elects to participate in this program will also be required to have a formal written agreement with partnering schools or districts to provide continued mentoring support for graduates of the pilot program during their first year in a school leadership position, which shall include, but not be limited to, setting selection criteria, and the recruitment and training processes for mentors; and developing plans to provide research-based professional development programs for mentors and school leaders.
    3. Costs:
    The proposed amendment is permissive in nature and any costs associated with the proposed amendment only apply to institutions and high need schools that elect to participate in the pilot program. However, for each candidate in the pilot program, the State Education Department estimates that it will cost a high need school or school district that elects to participate in the program approximately $6,200 per year to provide mentoring. The Department also anticipates that for any institution that elects to participate in the pilot program, it will incur the same costs for the development and implementation of this program as they would for a traditional principal preparation program and that such institutions could use existing faculty to meet supervision requirements of the proposed amendment.
    4. Minimizing adverse impact:
    Implementation of the proposed rule will not have a negative impact on entities or individuals located in rural communities. The proposed amendment is permissive in nature. Only program providers that wish to offer a clinically rich principal preparation pilot program are required to meet the new requirements for such programs. High need schools and school districts that elect to participate in the pilot program will benefit by having access to a larger pool of principal candidates, although they will have the expense of providing mentoring support.
    The proposed amendment relates to requirements for teaching certification to qualify for service in the State's public schools. The State Education Department does not believe that establishing a different standard for teachers who live or work in rural areas is warranted. A uniform standard ensures the quality of the State's teaching workforce.
    5. Rural area participation:
    The Department has shared the proposed amendment and sought input from the School Administrators Association of New York State, the New York State Federation of School Administrators, the Collegiate Association for Developing Educational Administrators, the Metropolitan Council for Educational Administration and the New York State Council of School Superintendents. These organizations have representatives from school districts across the State.
    Job Impact Statement
    The purpose of the proposed amendment is to create a clinically rich principal preparation pilot program to address the retention issues in high need schools and improve student growth and achievement. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to establish program registration standards for the pilot program and to authorize institutions, other than institutions of higher education, that are selected by the Board of Regents to offer teacher preparation programs under this pilot program. Such institutions may include, but not be limited to, cultural institutions, libraries, research centers, and other organizations with an educational mission that are selected by the Board of Regents to participate in the program.
    Because it is evident from the nature of the rule that it will not have a substantial adverse impact on jobs and employment opportunities, no affirmative steps were needed to ascertain that fact and none were taken. Accordingly, a job impact statement is not required, and one has not been prepared.

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/25/2010
Publish Date:
06/09/2010