Home » 2013 Issues » July 10, 2013 » RWB-08-13-00005-E Ability of a New Owner of a Claimed Horse to Void the Claim
RWB-08-13-00005-E Ability of a New Owner of a Claimed Horse to Void the Claim
7/10/13 N.Y. St. Reg. RWB-08-13-00005-E
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XXXV, ISSUE 28
July 10, 2013
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
NEW YORK STATE GAMING COMMISSION
EMERGENCY RULE MAKING
I.D No. RWB-08-13-00005-E
Filing No. 680
Filing Date. Jun. 24, 2013
Effective Date. Jun. 24, 2013
Ability of a New Owner of a Claimed Horse to Void the Claim
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
Action taken:
Amendment of section 4038.5 of Title 9 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law, sections 103(1), 104(1), (19), 122 and 128
Finding of necessity for emergency rule:
Preservation of public safety and general welfare.
Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity:
The Board has determined that immediate adoption of this rule is necessary for the preservation of the public safety and general welfare and that compliance with the requirements of subdivision 1 of Section 202 of the State Administrative Procedure Act would be contrary to the public interest.
Between November 2011 and March 2012, 21 thoroughbred horses in New York State died or were euthanized while racing at Aqueduct Race Track. Their deaths prompted a comprehensive analysis of the circumstances and possible causes for the deaths of these horses by the New York Task Force on Racehorse Health and Safety. One common aspect in these races was the fact that the horse that broke down was often involved in a claiming race. This rule is necessary to remove an incentive that a trainer or owner may have for entering an unsound horse in claiming race for the purpose of racing and potentially transferring a horse without proper regard to the horse’s well-being and the integrity of racing. The Board previously adopted an amendment to Section 4038.5 that allowed for a claim to be voided if the horse died during the race or was euthanized on the racetrack. The Task Force recommended this amendment be adopted on an emergency basis to more adequately remove any incentive for racing unsound claiming horses.
Given the danger of a horse breaking down, and the safety threat presented to both the jockey on the horse and the jockeys riding in close proximity, this rule is necessary to protect the safety of human and equine athletes. Thoroughbred horses travel over the racetrack at an average speed of approximately 40 miles per hour, sometimes exceeding that average as they sprint to the finish or sprint to gain positional advantage. An unsound horse racing on short rest may be forced to race beyond its limits and result in a fatal breakdown, oftentimes in a sudden or uncontrollable breakdown.
This rule is also necessary to protect the general welfare of the horse racing industry and the thousands of jobs that are created through it. Public confidence in both the process of racing and in pari-mutuel wagering system is necessary for the sport to survive, and with it the jobs and revenue generated in support of government. Claiming races play an essential part of thoroughbred racing and pari-mutuel wagering. This rule is necessary to ensure integrity in the claiming process, and in turn ensure that the when a horse steps onto a race track, it doing so for the purpose of winning and not merely to foster a transaction.
Subject:
Ability of a new owner of a claimed horse to void the claim.
Purpose:
To remove the incentive to horse owners to race substandard horses in a claiming race.
Text of emergency rule:
Under subdivision (a) of Section 4038.5 of Title 9 NYCRR, paragraph (3) is added and paragraph (1) is amended to read as follows:
(1) the claim is voidable at the discretion of the new owner pursuant to the conditions stated in section [4038.18] 4038.19 of this subchapter unless the age or sex of such horse has been misrepresented, and subject to the provisions of subdivision (b) of this section; [and]
(2) a claim shall be void for any horse that dies during a race or is euthanized on the track following a race[.]; and
(3) a claim is voidable at the discretion of the new owner, for a period of one hour after the race is made official, for any horse that is vanned off the track after the race.
This notice is intended
to serve only as a notice of emergency adoption. This agency intends to adopt the provisions of this emergency rule as a permanent rule, having previously submitted to the Department of State a notice of proposed rule making, I.D. No. RWB-08-13-00005-E, Issue of February 20, 2013. The emergency rule will expire August 22, 2013.
Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
John Googas, New York State Gaming Commission, One Broadway Center, Suite 600, Schenectady, New York 12305-2553, (518) 395-5400, email: info@gaming.ny.gov
Regulatory Impact Statement
1. Statutory authority and legislative objectives of such authority: The New York State Gaming Commission is authorized to promulgate these rules pursuant to Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law sections 103(1), 104(1), 104(19), 122, and 128. Under sections 103(1) and 104(1), the Gaming Commission has general jurisdiction over all horse racing and pari-mutuel wagering activities in the state and the corporations and associations and persons engaged therein, and is responsible for the supervision, regulation, and administration thereof. Section 104(19) authorizes the Gaming Commission to promulgate any rules and regulations that it deems necessary to carry out its responsibilities. Section 122 provides that all rule-making of the former New York State Racing and Wagering Board shall continue in force and effect as rule-making of the Gaming Commission until duly modified or abrogated by such commission. Section 128 authorizes the new Gaming Commission to promulgate regulations on an emergency basis by methods outside of standard administrative procedural requirements to ensure continuity through readopting current emergency rules of the Gaming Commission.
2. Legislative objectives: To enable the New York State Gaming Commission to preserve the integrity of pari-mutuel racing, while generating reasonable revenue for the support of government.
3. Needs and benefits: This rulemaking is necessary to assure integrity, safety and public confidence in claiming races by removing incentives to use the claiming race process as a means of racing and transferring unsound horses. This rulemaking removes the incentive to enter an unsound horse in a claiming race with the intended goal of protecting both the health and safety of the equine and human athlete.
All claiming horses are, in effect, offered for sale at a designated price within the range of the claiming race in which they are entered by their owners. The potential buyer of a horse in a claiming race must enter his claim before the race. By entering a horse in a claiming race, the owner is offering his horse for sale to another individual.
This amendment will reduce the incidence of injuries/deaths in horse races by changing the claiming rule to allow a successful claimant to void a claim when the horse is unable to walk off the track and must be transported – or vanned – off the race track. The current rule provides a regulatory mechanism by which a successful claimant may void a claim in the event that a horse dies during the race or is euthanized on the track.
Adoption of this amendment was recommended by the New York Task Force on Racehorse Health and Safety, which recently released its report of investigation concerning the death of 21 thoroughbred race horse between November 2011 and March 2012. The report stated: “The Task Force recommends that the NYSRWB Rule 4038.5 be amended to provide that a claim is voidable, at the discretion of the claimant and within one hour of the conclusion of the race, for a horse that is vanned off the track.” The report further states: “The Task Force believes the NYSRWB emergency amendment to Rule 4038 (in April 2012) represents an improvement by establishing a deterrent to the willful entry of a compromised horse, but that it should be further amended to provide that a claim is voidable by the claimant within one hour of the conclusion of the race if the horse is vanned off the track. The voiding of a claim should not require the death of a horse.”
4. Costs:
(a) Costs to regulated parties for the implementation of and continuing compliance with the rule: None.
(b) Costs to the agency, the state and local governments for the implementation and continuation of the rule: None.
(c) The information, including the source(s) of such information and the methodology upon which the cost analysis is based: Commission staff reviewed the cost factors and determined that the rule can be implemented using the existing system for voiding a claim, and no additional costs will be added.
(d) Where an agency finds that it cannot provide a statement of costs, a statement setting forth the agency’s best estimate, which shall indicate the information and methodology upon which the estimate is based and the reason(s) why a complete cost statement cannot be provided. Not applicable.
5. Local government mandates: None. The New York State Gaming Commission is the only governmental entity authorized to regulate pari-mutuel harness racing activities.
6. Paperwork: There will be no additional paperwork. The process will rely on the existing administrative forms and processes for voiding a claim.
7. Duplication: None.
8. Alternatives: Proposals include allowing the claimant to void a claim immediately after a race for no reason or giving race secretaries authority to include the above condition in claiming races. These alternatives were considered impractical.
The Commission also considered a rule to required the stewards to consult with a designated veterinarian before voiding a claim for a horse that has suffered a catastrophic injury or death before it was unsaddled following its race. This alternative was rejected in favor of the proposed rule, which is a bright line threshold rather than an arguably judgmental determination.
9. Federal standards: None.
10. Compliance schedule: As an emergency rule, the amendments can be implemented immediately upon submission to the Department of State.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Rural Area Flexibility Analysis and Job Impact Statement
As is evident by the nature of this rulemaking, this proposal affects the voiding of claims when a horse is injured during a race and requires transportation off the track and will not have an adverse affect on jobs or small businesses. The narrow economic impact of this amendment is limited to those instances where a claim on a thoroughbred race horse is voidable if the horse is unable to walk off the race track and is transported off the track. The Board previously adopted a similar rule that allowed a claim to be voided if the horse dies on the track or is euthanized. Since that rule was adopted as an emergency rule in April 2012, there has been only one instance of a claimed horse dying on the track. The indirect economic impact of this rule is that it will discourage horse owners from entering unsound horses in claiming races. The Board believes that this limited economic impact will not adversely impact rural areas, jobs, small businesses or local governments and does not require a Regulatory Flexibility Statement, Rural Area Flexibility Statement or Job Impact Statement because it will not impose an adverse impact on rural areas, nor will it affect jobs. This amendment is intended to reduce an incentive to race an unsound horse. A Regulatory Flexibility Statement and a Rural Area Flexibility Statement are not required because the rule does not adversely affect small business, local governments, public entities, private entities, or jobs in rural areas. There will be no impact for reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements on public or private entities in rural areas. A Jobs Impact Statement is not required because this rule amendment will not adversely impact jobs. This rulemaking does not impact upon a small business pursuant to such definition in the State Administrative Procedure Act § 102 (8) nor does it negatively affect employment. The proposal will not impose adverse economic impact on reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements on small businesses in rural or urban areas nor on employment opportunities. The rule does not impose any technological changes on the industry either.
