Home » 2010 Issues » July 28, 2010 » LAB-30-10-00002-E Restrictions on the Consecutive Hours of Work for Nurses as Enacted in Section 167 of the Labor Law
LAB-30-10-00002-E Restrictions on the Consecutive Hours of Work for Nurses as Enacted in Section 167 of the Labor Law
7/28/10 N.Y. St. Reg. LAB-30-10-00002-E
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XXXII, ISSUE 30
July 28, 2010
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
EMERGENCY RULE MAKING
I.D No. LAB-30-10-00002-E
Filing No. 715
Filing Date. Jul. 09, 2010
Effective Date. Jul. 09, 2010
Restrictions on the Consecutive Hours of Work for Nurses as Enacted in Section 167 of the Labor Law
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
Action taken:
Addition of Part 177 to Title 12 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
Labor Law, section 21
Finding of necessity for emergency rule:
Preservation of public health, public safety and general welfare.
Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity:
Section 167 of the Labor Law is effective July 1, 2009. However, Section 167 does not provide sufficient details with regard to what is expected of health care providers so as to avoid mandatory overtime for nurses, except in emergency situations. Section 167 was enacted to improve the health care environment for patients and the working environment for nurses.
Subject:
Restrictions on the consecutive hours of work for nurses as enacted in section 167 of the Labor Law.
Purpose:
To clarify the emergency circumstances under which an employer may require mandatory overtime for nurses.
Substance of emergency rule:
By L. 2008, ch. 493, § 1, the New York State Legislature created Section 167 of the Labor Law with the title "Restrictions on consecutive hours of work for nurses."
The proposed rule creates a new part of regulations designated as 12 NYCRR Part 177 entitled "Restrictions on Consecutive Hours of Work for Nurses."
Subpart 177.1, entitled "Application," sets forth that Part 177 applies to the hours of work for all nurses by health care employers.
Subpart 177.2, entitled "Definitions," sets forth the definitions, for the purposes of Part 177, of the following terms: "emergency," "health care disaster," "health care employer," "nurse," "on call," "overtime," "patient care emergency," and "regularly scheduled work hours."
Subpart 177.3, entitled "Mandatory Overtime Prohibition," provides that a health care employer is prohibited from requiring a nurse to work overtime. Subpart B sets forth the exceptions to that prohibition, which are entitled: "Health Care Disaster," "Government Declaration of Emergency," "Patient Care Emergency," and "Ongoing Medical or Surgical Procedure." Subpart B provides that the Part 177 does not prohibit a nurse from voluntarily working overtime.
Subpart 177.4, entitled "Nurse Coverage Plans," provides that health care employers are required to prepare and implement a "Nurse Coverage Plan" within ninety days of the effective date of this part and also sets forth the requirements for such a plan.
Subpart 177.5, entitled "Report of Violations," provides the Department of Labor shall establish a procedure to file a complaint of a violation of Part 177.
Subpart 177.6, entitled "Conflicts of Law and Regulation; Collective Bargaining Rights Not Diminished," provides that the provisions of Part 177 shall not be construed to diminish or waive the rights of nurses.
Subpart 177.7, entitled "Waiver of Rights Prohibited," provides that a health care employer may not utilize employee waivers as an alternative to compliance with Labor Law Section 167 or Part 177.
This notice is intended
to serve only as a notice of emergency adoption. This agency intends to adopt this emergency rule as a permanent rule and will publish a notice of proposed rule making in the State Register at some future date. The emergency rule will expire October 6, 2010.
Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
Teresa Stoklosa, New York State Department of Labor, Counsel's Office State Office Campus, Building 12, Room 509, Albany, NY 12240, (518) 457-4380, email: teresa.stoklosa@Labor.ny.gov
Regulatory Impact Statement
1. Statutory authority:
Section 21 of the Labor Law provides the Commissioner with authority to issue regulations governing any provision of the Labor Law as she finds necessary and proper. This rule is proposed pursuant to Section 167 of the Labor Law enacted by chapter 493 of the Laws of 2008. The effective date of the law is July 1, 2009.
2. Legislative objectives:
Legislation passed during the last legislative session (Chapter 493 of the Laws of 2008) recognizes the physical and emotional toll that mandatory overtime can take on nurses and on patient care. In response to these concerns, the legislation requires that health care employers take steps to prudently plan for adequate nursing staff coverage in their facilities so as to avoid the need to require mandatory overtime of nurses in most instances.
The rule improves the health care environment for patients and the working environment for nurses by clarifying the emergency circumstances under which an employer may require mandatory overtime. The Legislature's intent in enacting Section 167 was to encourage employers to attract and retain nurses in the profession during this period of shortage.
3. Needs and benefits:
Nurses work in a demanding and stressful environment where sound decision-making is a matter of life and death for patients. Limitations on mandatory overtime avoid successive work shifts which take a physical and mental toll on nurse's performance and can impact the quality of patient care. Labor Law Article 6, section 167 places restrictions on consecutive hours of work for nurses, except in emergency situations, while not prohibiting a nurse from voluntarily working overtime and allows an employer who experiences an unanticipated staffing emergency that does not regularly occur, to require overtime to ensure patient safety.
The enabling legislation does not provide sufficient details with regard to what is expected of health care employers so as to avoid mandatory overtime, except in emergency situations. The rule addresses these statutory gaps by requiring that covered employers develop a Nurse Coverage Plan (the Plan), by setting forth the minimum elements to be addressed in the Plan, and by requiring that the Plan be posted and made available to the Commissioner, to nursing staff and their employee representatives. At the same time, the rule clarifies circumstances under which various types of emergencies will allow health care employers to use mandatory overtime to cover nurse staffing needs.
Finally, the rule will improve overall patient care by allowing patients to be cared for by nurses who can exercise sound decision-making because they have had the proper rest needed to perform their duties. In sum, the reduction of the use of mandatory overtime should help employers attract and retain adequate numbers of nurses to ensure patient safety.
4. Costs:
Employers in both the public and private sectors covered by this rule may have to enter into contracts with nursing staff providers such as nurses' registries, per diem nursing services, and temporary agencies to have a viable source of additional nursing staff to use in lieu of mandating overtime of current staff. The cost for individual health care employers will depend upon the extent to which the Plan relies on these contract workers and the degree of coverage that the health care employer will need. In the current environment of nursing shortages, a major medical center with several special care units requiring specially trained nursing staff may find it more difficult to fill shifts from among their own nursing staff. At the other end of the spectrum, facilities with a very small staff, few resources or in underserved or remote locations may not be able to compete to fill vacancies. At the time this legislation was before the Governor for action, the Division of Budget estimated compliance would cost approximately $13 million in its first year. However, these costs - attributable to the hiring of per diem nurses necessary to ensure that sufficient nursing care is available for patients in the absence of the availability of mandatory overtime - will be offset by savings of $5 million, which otherwise would have been paid for such overtime. Also, it is likely that in the one year period from when Section 167 was enacted into law, employers have been preparing for implementation of the statute and have taken steps to mitigate costs associated with this new law.
Other than staffing needs, costs associated with the rule will be administrative. Health care employers must prepare a Plan which takes into account typical patterns of staff absenteeism due to illness, leave, bereavement and other similar factors as well as the number and types of patients typically served in the health care employer's facility. The Plan must also identify and describe the alternative staffing methods the employer will use to avoid mandatory overtime. It is not anticipated that any health care employer would have to retain outside professional services to prepare the Nurse Coverage Plan. Although there are administrative costs and time associated with developing and maintaining a written Plan and log, these costs may be offset through use of a Plan that may reduce the need for last-minute supplemental staffing.
Legal services may be required to negotiate, draft or review contracts with alternative staffing providers such as per diem agencies. It is anticipated that a vast majority of health care providers in the state already have such agreements in place or have procurement or legal staff who regularly work on such contracts.
Requirements with regard to the posting of such Plan and the logging of efforts to obtain staff coverage in compliance with the Plan will result in minimal or no additional cost.
5. Paperwork:
The employer will be required to develop and post the Nurse Coverage Plan discussed above, along with all necessary paperwork to log the efforts to obtain staff coverage in compliance with the Plan. Additionally, the Nurse Coverage Plan may require the drafting of contracts with alternative staffing providers such as per diem agencies and the posting of a list of nurses seeking voluntary overtime.
6. Local government mandates:
This rule will have an impact on any county, city, town, village, school district, fire district or other special district that employ nurses. The impact will depend on the size of the facility and nursing staff and the degree to which mandatory, unscheduled overtime is currently being used on a routine basis.
7. Duplication:
This rule does not duplicate any state or federal regulations.
8. Alternatives:
One alternative is to draft regulations which allow the employers to have full discretion to make determinations regarding the existence of an emergency on an ad hoc basis. However, such discretion is inconsistent with the letter and spirit of the statute. Clearly, certain levels of absenteeism based upon sick leave, bereavement, leaves of absences, and breaks during shifts will always exist in all employment settings, including health care facilities. A health care employer must plan for these expected staffing issues, based upon patterns that have emerged from operating a facility and must have staffing options that address the need to provide appropriate nursing care. Accordingly, the Commissioner must retain the right to cite an employer whose declaration of an emergency situation is not supported by the facts or is intended to evade the restrictions imposed by the law or limit the protections afforded nurses under the law.
The Department of Labor circulated draft regulations for comment to State Agencies and other employer groups, and to various employee representative groups. In some instances, changes to the regulations were made in response to such concerns. For example, the Department of Corrections (DOCS) requested clarification regarding examples of health care disasters set forth in Section 177.3 of the regulations. Specifically, DOCS requested that the regulations include language that a health care disaster included the occurrence of a riot, disturbance, or other serious event within an institution that increases the level of nursing care needed. The regulations were revised to include such language.
The Department received comments from one employer group, the Healthcare Association of New York State, that the regulations should provide alternatives to healthcare employers regarding the conspicuous posting of the Nurse Coverage Plans. It was suggested that the regulations authorize employers to utilize other means to make the Nurse Coverage Plans available to nursing staff such as the employer's intranet. The Department considered this comment and revised the regulations to allow for the use of other means to make the Nurse Coverage Plan available to nursing staff.
The Department also received a comment from employee representatives about requiring the filing of all Nurse Coverage Plans with the Commissioner of Labor. The Department considered such a filing requirement but decided it was unnecessary since the Commissioner will request such Plans once a complaint has been received about an employer. Moreover, since employees or their representatives are entitled to receive the Plan on request or otherwise have access to the plan, they can take immediate steps to ensure that the Plan has been prepared and notify the Commissioner if it has not.
Finally, the Department heard from representatives of public sector nurses that the definition of regularly scheduled work hours should include a reference to regulations governing such typical work hours. The language in relevant sections of the rule has been changed in response to this request.
In other instances, the Department has not made changes in response to comments received, so that comments from other regulated parties, nurses, and their representatives could be obtained during the rulemaking process and considered along with some comments before final action is taken.
9. Federal standards:
There are no federal standards with like requirements.
10. Compliance schedule:
The rule would be effective on the same date as the statute: July 1, 2009. However, the Nurse Coverage Plans required by Section 177.4 of the regulations are to be prepared within ninety days of the effective date of the regulations. This gives employers ample time to develop and implement these Nurse Coverage Plans.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
1. Effect of rule:
This rule will apply to all health care employers which include any individual, partnership, association, corporation, limited liability company or any person or group of persons acting directly or indirectly on behalf of or in the interest of the employer, which provides health care services in a facility licensed or operated pursuant to Article 28 of the Public Health Law, including any facility operated by the State, a political subdivision or a public corporation as defined by Section 66 of the General Construction Law or in a facility operated by the State, a political subdivision or a public corporation as defined by Section 66 of the General Construction law, operated or licensed pursuant to the Mental Hygiene Law, the Education Law, or the Correction Law. Accordingly, small businesses and local governments may be impacted if they provide health care services in a facility noted above. The Department's Division of Research and Statistics estimates that there are 4,175 health care facilities in the State with fewer than 100 employees. Of these 4,175 employers, 4,143 are private employers and 32 are public employers. 2. Compliance requirements:
The record and reporting requirements contained in the proposed rule are minimal. Healthcare employers must prepare a Nurse Coverage Plan which takes into account typical patterns of staff absenteeism due to illness, leave, bereavement and other similar factors as well as the number and types of patients typically served in the health care employer's facility. The Plan must also identify and describe the alternative staffing methods the employer will use to avoid mandatory overtime. Additionally, the health care must make the Nurse Coverage Plan available to: nursing staff by posting the Plan or making it available to nursing staff by the intranet, employee representatives and to the Commissioner upon request. The health care employer must also maintain a log of efforts to obtain staff coverage in compliance with the Plan.
3. Professional services:
Legal services may be required to negotiate, draft and review contracts with alternative staffing providers such as per diem agencies. It is anticipated that a vast majority of health care providers in the state already have such agreements in place or have procurement or legal staff who regularly work on such contracts.
The rule will require health care employers to seek alternative sources to obtain the services of nurses other than forcing their current nursing staff to work mandatory overtime shifts. In this respect, the health care employers will be seeking professional nursing services which would have otherwise been performed by their current nursing staff on a mandatory basis.
4. Compliance costs:
Employers in both the public and private sectors covered by this rule may have to enter into contracts with nursing staff providers such as nurses' registries, per diem nursing services, and temporary agencies to have a viable source of nursing staff to use in lieu of mandatory overtime. The cost for individual health care employers will depend upon the extent to which the nurse staffing plan relies on these contract workers and the degree of coverage that the health care facility will need. For example, a major medical center with several special care units requiring specially trained nursing staff may find it more difficult to fill shifts from among their own nursing staff because of the need to fill such vacancies with nurses having the same specialized training. At the other end of the spectrum, facilities with very a small staff may find it equally difficult to fill vacancies without having to utilize outside staffing service providers. At the time this legislation was before the Governor for action, the Division of Budget estimated compliance would cost approximately $13 million in its first year. However, these costs - attributable to the hiring of per diem nurses necessary to ensure that sufficient nursing care is available for patients in the absence of the availability of mandatory overtime - will be offset by savings of $5 million, which otherwise would have been paid for such overtime. Also, it is likely that in the one year period from when Section 167 was enacted into law, employers have been preparing for implementation of the statute and have taken steps to mitigate costs associated with this new law.
Other than staffing needs, costs associated with the rule will be administrative. Health care employers must prepare a Nurse Coverage Plan which takes into account typical patterns of staff absenteeism due to illness, leave, bereavement and other similar factors as well as the number and types of patients typically served in the health care employer's facility. The Plan must also identify and describe the alternative staffing methods the employer will use to avoid mandatory overtime. It is not anticipated that any health care employer would have to retain outside professional services to prepare the Nurse Coverage Plan. Although there are administrative costs and time associated with developing and maintaining a written Plan and log, these costs may be offset through the use of a Plan that may reduce the need for last-minute supplemental staffing.
Legal services may be required to negotiate, draft or review contracts with alternative staffing providers such as per diem agencies. It is anticipated that a vast majority of health care providers in the state already have such agreements in place or have procurement or legal staff who regularly work on such contracts.
Requirements with regard to the posting of such Plan and the logging of efforts to obtain staff coverage in compliance with the Plan will result in minimal or no additional cost.
5. Economic and technological feasibility:
The proposed rule does not impose any new technological requirements. Economic feasibility is addressed above under compliance costs.
6. Minimizing adverse impact:
This rule is necessary to implement Labor Law, Section 167, as enacted by chapter 493 of the Laws of 2008. Although this enabling legislation does not require the promulgation of regulations, it does not provide sufficient details with regard to what is expected of health care employers so as to avoid, to the greatest extent possible, unnecessary mandatory overtime. The rule addresses these statutory gaps by requiring that covered employers develop a staffing plan, by setting forth the minimum elements to be addressed in this plan, and by requiring that the plan be made available to the Commissioner and to nursing staff and their representatives. At the same time, the rule clarifies circumstances under which various types of emergencies will exempt health care employers from the prohibition against mandatory overtime to cover nursing staffing needs that would otherwise apply.
This rule fulfills the legislative objective of chapter 493 by improving the health care environment for patients and the working environments for nurses and their families, while at the same time minimizes the potential impact on the health care employers by allowing them to develop a Nurse Coverage Plan which addresses their specific needs and takes into account all of their specific circumstances.
7. Small business and local government participation:
The Department solicited input on these regulations from various employer representatives. These employer representatives have members from small businesses and local governments.
Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
1. Types and estimated numbers of rural areas:
Any rural area where nurses are employed will be affected. The type of affect will depend on the degree to which those areas are currently relying on unscheduled, mandatory overtime to fill staffing requirements.
2. Reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance requirements; and professional services:
The reporting, recordkeeping and compliance requirements contained in the proposed rule are minimal. The employer will be required to develop a Nurse Coverage Plan which identifies and describes as many alternative staffing methods as are available to the health care employer to ensure adequate staffing through means other than use of overtime, including, but not limited to, contracts with per diem nurses, contracts with nurse registries and employment agencies for nursing services, arrangements for assignment of nursing floats, requesting an additional day of work from off-duty employees, and development and posting of a list of nurses seeking voluntary overtime. The healthcare employer must log all good faith attempts to seek alternative staffing through the methods identified in the health care employers' Nurse Coverage Plan. The Plan must be in writing, and be provided to the nursing staff, to any collective bargaining representative representing nurses at the health care facility and to the Commissioner of Labor upon request.
The rule will also require health care employers to seek alternative sources to obtain the services of nurses other than forcing their current nursing staff to work mandatory overtime shifts. In this respect, the health care employers will be seeking professional nursing services which would have otherwise been performed by their current nursing staff on a mandatory basis. This may necessitate the drafting of contracts with alternative staffing providers such as per diem agencies. 3. Costs:
Employers in both the public and private sectors covered by this rule may have to enter into contracts with nursing staff providers such as nurses' registries, per diem nursing services, and temporary agencies to have a viable source of additional nursing staff to use in lieu of mandating overtime of current staff. The cost for individual health care employers will depend upon the extent to which the Plan relies on these contract workers and the degree of coverage that the health care employer will need. In the current environment of nursing shortages, a major medical center with several special care units requiring specially trained nursing staff may find it more difficult to fill shifts from among their own nursing staff. At the other end of the spectrum, facilities with a very small staff, few resources or in underserved or remote locations may not be able to compete to fill vacancies. At the time this legislation was before the Governor for action, the Division of Budget estimated compliance would cost approximately $13 million in its first year. However, these costs - attributable to the hiring of per diem nurses necessary to ensure that sufficient nursing care is available for patients in the absence of the availability of mandatory overtime - will be offset by savings of $5 million, which otherwise would have been paid for such overtime. Also, it is likely that in the one year period from when Section 167 was enacted into law, employers have been preparing for implementation of the statute and have taken steps to mitigate costs associated with this new law.
Other than staffing needs, costs associated with the rule will be administrative. Health care employers must prepare a Plan which takes into account typical patterns of staff absenteeism due to illness, leave, bereavement and other similar factors as well as the number and types of patients typically served in the health care employer's facility. The Plan must also identify and describe the alternative staffing methods the employer will use to avoid mandatory overtime. It is not anticipated that any health care employer would have to retain outside professional services to prepare the Nurse Coverage Plan. Although there are administrative costs and time associated with developing and maintaining a written Plan and log, these costs may be offset through the use of a Plan in place that may reduce the need for last-minute supplemental staffing.
Legal services may be required to negotiate, draft or review contracts with alternative staffing providers such as per diem agencies. It is anticipated that a vast majority of health care providers in the state already have such agreements in place or have procurement or legal staff who regularly work on such contracts.
Requirements with regard to the posting of such Plan and the logging of efforts to obtain staff coverage in compliance with the Plan will result in minimal or no additional cost.
4. Minimizing adverse impact:
This rule is necessary to implement Labor Law, Section 167, as enacted by chapter 493 of the Laws of 2008. Although this enabling legislation does not require the promulgation of regulations, it does not provide sufficient details with regard to what is expected of health care employers so as to avoid, to the greatest extent possible, unnecessary mandatory overtime. The rule addresses these statutory gaps by requiring that covered employers develop a staffing plan, by setting forth the minimum elements to be addressed in this plan, and by requiring that the plan be made available to the Commissioner and to nursing staff and their representatives. At the same time, the rule clarifies circumstances under which various types of emergencies will exempt health care employers from the prohibition against mandatory overtime to cover nursing staffing needs that would otherwise apply.
This rule fulfills the legislative objective of chapter 493 by improving the health care environment for patients and the working environments for nurses and their families, while at the same time minimizes the potential impact on the health care employers by allowing them to develop a Nurse Coverage Plan which addresses their specific needs and takes into account all of their specific circumstances.
5. Rural area participation:
The Department sought input on these regulations from various employee representative groups which represent rural area employees. Additionally, the Department received input from various employer representative groups which also represent rural area employers.
Job Impact Statement
Health care employers covered by this rule may have to enter into contracts with nursing staff providers such as nurses' registries, per diem nursing services and temporary agencies to have a viable source of nursing staff to use in lieu of mandatory overtime. At the time Section 167 of the Labor Law (the statutory authority for this rule) was before the Governor for signature, the Division of the Budget estimated compliance would cost approximately $13 million in its first year, which was attributable to the hiring of per diem nurses to ensure that sufficient nursing care is available for patients in the absence of the availability of mandatory overtime. Accordingly, this rule would not have a substantial adverse impact on jobs; in fact it will create more jobs.
