PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
Action taken:
Amendment of Parts 10-14 of Title 5 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
General Municipal Law, art. 18-B, section 959
Finding of necessity for emergency rule:
Preservation of general welfare.
Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity:
The reforms enacted in ch. 63, L. 2005 require the reconfiguration of the existing Empire Zones by Jan. 1, 2006. Immediate guidance to the affected parties is required.
Subject:
The Empire Zones Program.
Purpose:
To conform the regulations to existing statute and recent statutory amendments and clarify and improve administrative procedures.
Substance of emergency rule:
The emergency rule is the result of changes to Article 18-B of the General Municipal Law pursuant to Chapter 63 of the Laws of 2005, as well as a comprehensive review of administrative procedures and existing regulations. The amended laws require the existing Empire Zones to identify revised zone boundaries—that is, placement of zone acreage into “distinct and separate contiguous areas”—to the Department of Economic Development by January 1, 2006. The existing regulations are affected by this requirement, but at the same time the zones need immediate guidance which requires amending the existing regulations in an accelerated fashion. At the same time, the existing regulations contain several outdated references, and the Department has also taken the opportunity to improve its administrative procedures. The Empire Zone regulations contained in 5 NYCRR Parts 10 through 14 are hereby amended as follows:
First, pursuant to Chapter 63 of the Laws of 2000 and Chapter 63 of the Laws of 2005, the emergency rule would reflect the name change of the program from Economic Development Zones to the Empire Zones and add reference to three new tax benefits: the Qualified Empire Zone Enterprise (“QEZE”) Real Property Tax Credit, QEZE Tax Reduction Credit, and the QEZE Sales and Use Tax Exemption. The emergency rule also reflects the eligibility of agricultural cooperatives for Empire Zone tax credits and the QEZE Real Property Tax Credit.
Second, the emergency rule would conform the regulations to existing statutory terminology, definitions and practices. For example, an incorrect reference to a local empire zone administrator is being corrected to read local empire zone certification officer or simply, the local empire zone, if applicable. Pursuant to statute, the chief executive officer must ensure that the information on a designation application is accurate and complete, not the local legislative body. The requirements for a shift resolution did not contain all the criteria as set forth in statute. Certain regulatory provisions regarding application for zone designation were not in accord with the statute, such as whether certain information must be contained in local law rather than the application itself. In addition, tracking the statutory changes from Chapter 63 of the Laws of 2005, census tract zones are renamed “investment zones”, county-created zones are renamed “development zones”, and the new term “cost-benefit analysis” is defined. The emergency regulation also tracks the amended statute's deletion of the category of contributions to a qualified Empire Zone Capital Corporation from those businesses eligible for the Zone Capital Credit.
Third, the emergency rule would amend the Department's discretionary provision that limits the designation of nearby lands in investment zones to 320 acres. Such regulatory limitations are arbitrary and unnecessarily exceed or are inconsistent with State statute, and at the same time place undue limits on the reconfiguration of zones; municipalities cannot effectively utilize zone acreage to create opportunities for business investment and job growth in economically distressed areas that are not necessarily located in eligible or contiguous census tracts. At the same time, the Department is required to provide guidance in regulation on placement of nearby zone lands, and cannot countenance abuse of the program's requirements on acreage placement. Thus, placement of nearby lands can exceed 320 acres provided that the municipality demonstrates that (1) there is insufficient existing or planned infrastructure within eligible or contiguous tracts to accommodate business development in a highly distressed area, or to accommodate development of strategic businesses or (2) placing up to 960 acres in eligible or contiguous census tracts would be inconsistent with open space and wetland protection or (3) there are insufficient lands available for further business development within eligible or contiguous census tracts or (4) lands previously designated in the eligible or contiguous census tracts that were otherwise suitable for development and have not had any appreciable commercial activity or capital investment or (5) changes to eligible census tracts as a result of the 2000 Census, combined with the requirement in the amended statute that the distinct and separate contiguous areas accommodate already designated lands, alter the amount of nearby acreage used and available for development.
Fourth, the emergency rule clarifies the statutory requirement from Chapter 63, L. 2005 that development zones (formerly county zones) create up to three areas within their reconfigured zones as investment (formerly census tract) zones. The rule would require that 75% of the acreage used to define these investment zones be included within an eligible or contiguous census tract. Furthermore, the rule would not require a development zone to place investment zone acreage within a municipality in that county if that particular municipality already contained an investment zone, and the only eligible census tracts were contained within that municipality. The purpose of this is to fulfill the intent of the new statutory amendments that the counties place a substantial portion of the zone acreage within eligible or contiguous census tracts, and this provision follows essentially the same method for concentrating acreage within distressed areas as the General Municipal Law employed for census tract zones.
Fifth, the emergency rule tracks the statutory requirements that zones reconfigure their existing acreage in up to three (for investment zones) or six (for development zones) distinct and separate contiguous areas, and that zones can allocate up to their total allotted acreage at the time of designation. These reconfigured zones must be presented to the Empire Zones Designation Board for unanimous approval. The emergency rule makes clear that zones may not necessarily designate all of their acreage into three or six areas or use all of their allotted acreage, however, any subsequent additions after their official redesignation by the Designation Board will still require unanimous approval by that Board.
Sixth, the emergency rule tracks the new statutory requirement that certain defined “regionally significant” projects can be located outside of the new distinct and separate contiguous areas. There are four categories of projects identified in Chapter 63; only one category of applications, manufacturers projecting the creation of 50 or more jobs, are allowed to progress before the identification of the distinct and separate contiguous areas and/or the approval of certain regulations by the Empire Zones Designation Board. The emergency rule identifies a timetable for meeting the minimum job creation requirement: 25% of the minimum jobs required to meet the definition of regionally significant project within 2 years of the date of designation of the project as regionally significant, 50% of the minimum jobs within 3 years, 75% of the minimum jobs within 4 years, and 100% of the minimum jobs within 5 years. Failure to achieve a milestone would trigger a decertification process.
Seventh, the emergency rule elaborates on the “demonstration of need” requirement mentioned in Chapter 63 of the Laws of 2005 for the addition (for both investment and development zones) of an additional distinct and separate contiguous area. A zone can demonstrate the need for a fourth or, as the case may be, a seventh distinct and separate contiguous area if (1) there is insufficient existing or planned infrastructure within the three (or six) distinct and separate contiguous areas to (a) accommodate business development and there are other areas of the applicant municipality that can be characterized as economically distressed and/or (b) accommodate development of strategic businesses as defined in the local development plan, or (2) placing all acreage in the other three or six distinct and separate contiguous areas would be inconsistent with open space and wetland protection, or (3) there are insufficient lands available for further business development within the other distinct and separate contiguous areas.
Eight, the emergency rule clarifies Chapter 63's permission for zone-certified businesses which will be located outside of the distinct and separate contiguous areas to receive zone benefits until decertified. The area which will be “grandfathered” shall be limited to the expansion of the certified business within the parcel or portion thereof that was originally located in the zone before redesignation. Each zone must identify any such business by December 30, 2005.
Ninth, the emergency rule tracks Chapter 63's requirement that new zone development plans, created in the conjunction with the new distinct and separate contiguous areas to be approved by the Empire Zones Designation Board, are to be approved by the Department within 90 days of submission. The emergency rule defines the date of submission for each zone as the date of approval of the distinct and separate contiguous areas by the Empire Zones Designation Board.
Tenth, the emergency rule fulfills the requirements of Chapter 63 to subject all businesses applying for zone benefits to meet a “cost-benefit analysis”. The cost-benefit analysis is to be included in the zone development plan by the applicant municipality. The definition included in the emergency rule lays out the basic formula for calculating the benefits received to the costs incurred.
Eleventh, the emergency rule clarifies the status of community development projects as a result of the reconfiguration of the zones pursuant to Chapter 63. The current regulations require the community development projects to be located in an Empire Zone in order for investments in those projects to qualify for tax benefits. Drawing distinct and separate contiguous areas around community development projects would severely limit the ability of Empire Zones to include as many eligible businesses as possible into the new distinct and separate contiguous areas. Community development projects are not necessarily required to be certified. There is a strong public policy preference for these projects and there is an expectation by their sponsors that they continue to offer tax credits to contributors until fundraising for the projects are completed. To that end, all community development projects approved by the Department before April 1, 2005 would be considered to be located within its respective Empire Zone, and a community development project will be considered to be located in the Empire Zone if it can demonstrate that a zone has been working with the project before April 1, 2005 for the purpose of submitting a boundary revision for inclusion in to the Zone that would include job creation.
Twelfth, the emergency rule would revise the application process in order to ensure timely action and improve efficiency and accountability. For example, the proposed process would no longer require the applicant to submit an application to both the Department and the Department of Labor. In addition, the proposed process allows the applicant to cure incomplete or deficient applications within a set time period.
Lastly, the emergency rule would add certain programmatic information that is helpful to zone administrators, applicants, and practitioners such as the method for determining the effective dates for certifications and boundary revisions.
to serve only as a notice of emergency adoption. This agency does not intend to adopt the provisions of this emergency rule as a permanent rule. The rule will expire October 13, 2007.
Text of emergency rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
Thomas Regan, Department of Economic Development, 30 South Pearl St., Albany, NY 12245, (518) 292-5120, e-mail: tregan@empire.state.ny.us
Regulatory Impact Statement
STATUTORY AUTHORITY:
Section 959(a) of the General Municipal Law authorizes the Commissioner of Economic Development to adopt rules and regulations governing the criteria of eligibility for empire zone designation, the application process, and the joint certification of a business enterprise.
LEGISLATIVE OBJECTIVES:
The rulemaking accords with the public policy objectives the Legislature sought to advance because the majority of such revisions are in direct response to recent statutory amendments and the remaining revisions conform the regulations to existing statute or clarify administrative procedures of the program. It is the public policy of the State to offer special incentives and assistance that will promote the development of new businesses, the expansion of existing businesses and the development of human resources within areas designated as Empire Zones. The proposed amendments help to further such objectives by enabling the Department of Economic Development to administer the program in a more efficient manner.
NEEDS AND BENEFITS:
The emergency rule is required in order to bring the regulations into accord with statute and to improve the overall administration and effectiveness of the program. There are several benefits that would be derived from this emergency rulemaking. First, the emergency regulations would conform to statutory provisions and thereby eliminate potential confusion to the practitioner. Second, the emergency rule would clarify the application process to ensure timely action and improve efficiency and accountability.
COSTS:
I. Costs to private regulated parties (the Business applicants): None. The emergency regulation will not impose any additional costs to the business applicants beyond the existing program. In fact, there may be a cost savings due to a clearer application and the ability to cure application deficiencies rather than being immediately denied.
II. Costs to the regulating agency for the implementation and continued administration of the rule: While there will be additional costs to the Department of Economic Development associated with the emergency rule making, this is a result of the statutory changes which the emergency regulation language tracks or interprets. All existing Empire Zones have to revise their boundaries as a result of the statutory changes, with certain exceptions tied to specific types of business or the timing of certain applications. This results in more paperwork and additional staff time over the course of the next twelve months as the program is reconfigured. However, over time staff and paperwork costs will be minimized because the statutory changes have clarified eligibility for the program and the revised regulations have made procedures for processing applications easier to understand.
III. Costs to the State government: None. There will be no additional costs to New York State as a result of the emergency rule making.
IV. Costs to local governments (the Local Zone administration): None. The emergency regulation will not impose any additional costs to the local zone administration beyond any additional costs associated with implementing the statutory requirements which reform the program. In the long term, there may be some cost savings in regards to staff time due to a clarification of program requirements.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANDATES:
None. Local governments are not mandated to participate in the Empire Zones Program. If a local government chooses to participate, there is a cost associated with local administration. However, this emergency rule does not impose any additional costs to the local governments beyond any additional costs associated with implementing the statutory requirements which reform the program.
PAPERWORK:
The emergency rule does create additional paperwork, insofar as the various Empire Zones have to refile applications to reconfigure their Zone acreage, identify regionally significant projects and “grandfathered” businesses where necessary, and process boundary revisions before deadlines enumerated in statute which are reproduced verbatim from the statute.
DUPLICATION:
The emergency rule will not duplicate or exceed any other existing Federal or State statute or regulation.
ALTERNATIVES:
No alternatives were considered with regard to amending the regulations in response to statutory revisions. Certain alternatives to policies seeking to be adopted were considered in certain subject areas where the Legislature provided some room for interpretation; for example, acreage devoted to existing businesses outside of the reconfigured zone areas, creation of investment zones within development zones, the placement of “nearby” acreage, the location of “grandfathered” businesses and the continuation of community development projects. In each case, interpretation was geared to preserving, to the extent possible, the expectation of benefits for existing zone businesses, making zone reconfiguration as clear as possible for existing zones, and enabling zone acreage to be utilized in the most effective manner. Finally, with regard to the application process, an alternative was considered to include more time for review of the application at the State level. This alternative was rejected because it was determined that certification of a business, which has a complete and sufficient application, should not be delayed.
FEDERAL STANDARDS:
There are no federal standards in regard to the Empire Zones program; it is purely a state program that offers, among other things, state and local tax credits. Therefore, the emergency rule does not exceed any Federal standard.
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE:
The affected State agencies (Economic Development and Labor), local zone administration and the business applicants will be able to achieve compliance with the emergency regulation as soon as it is implemented.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Participation in the Empire Zones Program is entirely at the discretion of each eligible municipality and business enterprise. Neither General Municipal Law Article 18-B nor the emergency regulations impose an obligation on any local government or business entity to participate in the program. The emergency regulation does not impose any adverse economic impact, reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements on small businesses and/or local governments. In fact, the emergency regulations may have a positive economic impact on the small businesses and local governments that do participate due to clarifying changes, the added flexibility and a new application process. The administrative structure of the program was designed to offer a streamlined application and approval process by extracting only essential information from the applicants. In addition, the changes to the regulations that track changes in statute and result in a reconfiguration of zones will actually enhance the ability of businesses yet to apply which are located in distressed areas to receive program benefits. Local governments will have the additional short-term burden of taking the legal and administrative steps necessary to reconfigure their zones, but this is a statutorily imposed burden, not solely a regulatory one. Because it is evident from the nature of the emergency rule that it will have either no substantive impact, or a positive impact, on small businesses and local governments, no further affirmative steps were needed to ascertain that fact and none were taken. Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility analysis for small businesses and local government is not required and one has not been prepared.
Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
The program is a statewide program. There are eligible municipalities and businesses in rural areas of New York State. However, participation is entirely at the discretion of eligible applicant municipalities and eligible business enterprises. The program does impose some responsibility on those municipalities and businesses which participate in the program such as submitting applications and reports. The emergency rule will not impose any additional reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements on public or private entities in rural areas. Therefore, the emergency regulation will not have a substantial adverse economic impact on rural areas or reporting, record keeping or other compliance requirements on public or private entities in such rural areas. Accordingly, a rural area flexibility analysis is not required and one has not been prepared.
Job Impact Statement
The emergency regulation relates to the Empire Zones Program. The Empire Zones Program itself is a job creation incentive. The emergency regulation will not have a substantial adverse impact on jobs and employment opportunities. In fact, the emergency regulations, which result from statutory-based reforms, will enable the program to better fulfill its mission: job creation and investment for economically distressed areas. At the same time, businesses currently receiving benefits will not have their status jeopardized as a result of the emergency regulations. Because it is evident from the nature of the emergency regulations that it will have either no impact, or a positive impact, on job and employment opportunities, no further affirmative steps were needed to ascertain that fact and none were taken. Accordingly, a job impact statement is not required and one has not been prepared.
