8/22/12 N.Y. St. Reg. PSC-34-12-00008-P
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following proposed rule:
Proposed Action:
The Commission is considering a filing by Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RG&E) proposing revisions to the Company's rules and regulations contained in P.S.C. Nos. 18 and 19—Electricity and P.S.C. No. 16—Gas.
Statutory authority:
Public Service Law, section 66(12)
Purpose:
To make tariff language consistent between RG&E and NYSEG where both Companies processes are the same.
Substance of proposed rule:
The Commission is considering whether to approve, modify or reject, in whole or in part, a proposal filed by Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RG&E) to make revisions to its electric and gas tariff schedules, P.S.C. Nos. 18 and 19—Electricity and P.S.C. No. 16—Gas. RG&E proposes to make tariff language consistent between RG&E and New York State Electric & Gas Corporation's electric and gas tariff schedules for certain terms and conditions where the Companies' processes are consistent. The filing has a proposed effective date of December 1, 2012. The Commission may resolve related matters and may apply its decision here to other companies.
Text of proposed rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained by filing a Document Request Form (F-96) located on our website http://www.dps.ny.gov/f96dir.htm. For questions, contact:
Leann Ayer, Public Service Commission, 3 Empire State Plaza, Albany, New York 12223-1350, (518) 486-2655, email:
leann.ayer@dps.ny.govData, views or arguments may be submitted to:
Jaclyn A. Brilling, Secretary, Public Service Commission, 3 Empire State Plaza, Albany, New York 12223-1350, (518) 474-6530, email:
secretary@dps.ny.govPublic comment will be received until:
45 days after publication of this notice.
Regulatory Impact Statement, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Rural Area Flexibility Analysis and Job Impact Statement
Statements and analyses are not submitted with this notice because the proposed rule is within the definition contained in section 102(2)(a)(ii) of the State Administrative Procedure Act.