EDU-31-11-00002-P Flexibility in Teacher Certification  

  • 8/3/11 N.Y. St. Reg. EDU-31-11-00002-P
    NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
    VOLUME XXXIII, ISSUE 31
    August 03, 2011
    RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
    EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
    PROPOSED RULE MAKING
    NO HEARING(S) SCHEDULED
     
    I.D No. EDU-31-11-00002-P
    Flexibility in Teacher Certification
    PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following proposed rule:
    Proposed Action:
    Amendment of section 80-4.3 of Title 8 NYCRR.
    Statutory authority:
    Education Law, sections 207, 3001 and 3004(1)
    Subject:
    Flexibility in teacher certification.
    Purpose:
    Provide teacher certification flexibility if it would provide for a more efficient operation of the school district or BOCES.
    Text of proposed rule:
    1. Subdivisions (k) and (m) of section 80-4.3 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education are amended, effective October 6, 2011, as follows:
    (k) Requirements for the issuance of a limited extension to teach a subject in grades 7-8 [during a period of immediate fiscal crisis] to provide an employing entity with flexibility in the assignment of teachers which will result in a more efficient operation of the employing entity and a 7-8 grade level extension.
    (1) Purpose. The purpose of extensions issued under this subdivision[, subject to their period of applicability as set forth in paragraph (2) of this subdivision,] is to authorize a teacher who is currently employed and certified in the classroom teaching service in childhood education (grades 1-6) or students with disabilities (grades 1-6) or an equivalent certificate title authorizing the teaching of all common branch subjects in childhood education (grades 1-6) to be reassigned by the employing entity to teach that subject in grades 7-8 [during a demonstrated fiscal crisis to avoid or mitigate a reduction in force consistent with the requirements of law.] in order to provide an employing entity with sufficient flexibility in the assignment of teachers which will result in a more efficient operation of the employing entity.
    (2) [Applicability. The provisions of this subdivision shall apply commencing October 6, 2011 and end on June 30, 2013.
    (3)] Limitations. A limited extension issued under this subdivision shall be valid for two years from its effective date and shall not be renewable. A limited extension may be issued to a teacher currently employed by an employing entity that meets the requirements in paragraph [(4)] (3) of this section. A limited extension shall authorize a candidate to teach a subject in grades 7-8 with that employing entity only. Thereafter, a 7-8 grade level extension may be issued to such teacher upon completion of the requirements in paragraph [(5)] (4) of this subdivision and shall authorize the teacher to teach a subject in grades 7 and 8 in any employing entity.
    [(4)] (3) Requirements for limited extension. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, a limited extension may be issued to a candidate in a specific subject area for grades 7 and 8 provided that the candidate meets the requirements in each of the following subparagraphs:
    (i) The candidate shall hold a valid provisional, permanent, initial or professional certificate in the classroom teaching service in childhood education (grades 1-6) or students with disabilities (grades 1-6) or an equivalent certificate title authorizing the teaching of all common branch subjects in grades 1 through 6; and
    (ii) The candidate shall submit a statement by the Chancellor, in the case of employment with the City School District of the City of New York; or by the superintendent, in the case of other employing boards; or by the chief school officer, in the case of employment with another entity required by law to employ certified teachers certifying that:
    (a) the employing entity seeks to reassign a currently employed teacher to a new teaching position in grades 7-8 in a subject area in the classroom teaching service;
    (b) the candidate meets the qualification requirements of section 120.6 of this Title, relating to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001;
    (c) [the employing entity is in an immediate fiscal crisis and the issuance of an extension in grades 7-8 to such candidate will avoid or mitigate a reduction in force] the issuance of an extension in grades 7-8 to such candidate will result in a more efficient operation of the employing entity.
    (d) the employing entity will provide appropriate support to the currently employed teacher undertaking a new teaching assignment under a limited extension to ensure the maintenance of quality instruction for students;
    (e) the employing entity will require, as a condition of employment under the extension, the candidate's enrollment in study at an institution of higher education to complete the requirements in paragraph [(5)] (4) of this subdivision; and
    (f) the employing entity will not assign the employed teacher to teach courses for high school credit;
    [(5)] (4) Requirements for 7-8 grade level extension in a subject. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, an extension to teach a subject in grades 7-8 shall be issued to a candidate in a specific subject area for grades 7 and 8 provided that the candidate successfully completes the New York State Teacher Certification Examination content specialty test in the subject for which a certificate extension is being sought and six semester hours of coursework in middle childhood education.
    (m) Requirements for the issuance of a limited extension to teach a subject in grades 5-6 [during a period of immediate fiscal crisis] to provide an employing entity with flexibility in the assignment of teachers which will result in a more efficient operation of the employing entity and a 5-6 grade level extension in a subject.
    (1) Purpose. The purpose of extensions issued under this subdivision[, subject to their period of applicability as set forth in paragraph (2) of this subdivision,] is to authorize a teacher who is currently employed and certified in the classroom teaching service in a certain subject in grades 7-12 and who has demonstrated an appropriate academic background to teach in the subject area of his/her grade 7-12 certificate, to be reassigned by the employing entity to teach that subject in grades 5-6 [during a demonstrated immediate fiscal crisis to avoid or mitigate a reduction in force, consistent with the requirements of law] in order to provide an employing entity with flexibility in the assignment of teachers which will result in a more efficient operation of the employing entity.
    (2) [Applicability. The provisions of this subdivision shall apply commencing April 27, 2010 and end on June 30, 2013.
    (3)] Limitations. A limited extension issued under this subdivision shall be valid for two years from its effective date and shall not be renewable. A limited extension may be issued to a teacher currently employed by an employing entity that meets the requirements in paragraph [(4)] (3) of this section. A limited extension shall authorize a candidate to teach a subject in grades 5-6 with that employing entity only. Thereafter, a 5-6 grade level extension may be issued to such teacher upon completion of the requirements in paragraph [(5)] (4) of this subdivision and shall authorize the teacher to teach a subject in grades 5-6 in any employing entity.
    [(4)] (3) Requirements for a limited extension to teach a subject in grades 5-6. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, a limited extension may be issued to a candidate in a subject for grades 5-6 provided that the candidate meets the requirements in each of the following subparagraphs:
    (i) the candidate shall hold a valid provisional, initial, permanent, or professional certificate in English language arts (7-12), language other than English (7-12), mathematics (7-12), biology (7-12), chemistry (7-12), earth science (7-12), physics (7-12), or social studies (7-12); and
    (ii) the candidate shall submit a statement by the Chancellor, in the case of employment with the City School District of the City of New York; or by the superintendent, in the case of other employing boards; or by the chief school officer, in the case of employment with another entity required by law to employ certified teachers certifying:
    (a) the employing entity seeks to reassign a currently employed teacher to a new teaching position in grades 5-6 in a subject area in the classroom teaching service;
    (b) the candidate meets the qualification requirements of section 120.6 of this Title, relating to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001;
    (c) [the employing entity is an immediate fiscal crisis and the issuance of a limited extension to such candidate to teach grades 5-6 will avoid or mitigate a reduction in force] the issuance of an extension in grades 7-8 to such candidate will result in a more efficient operation of the employing entity.
    (d) the employing entity will provide appropriate support to the currently employed teacher undertaking a new teaching assignment under a limited extension to ensure the maintenance of quality instruction for students; and
    (e) the employing entity will require, as a condition of employment under the extension, the candidate's enrollment in study at an institution of higher education to complete the requirements in paragraph [(5)] (4) of this subdivision.
    [(5)] (4) Requirements for a 5-6 grade level extension in a subject area. A 5-6 grade level extension may be issued to a candidate in a specific subject area provided that the candidate meets the requirements of subdivision (b) of this section.
    Text of proposed rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
    Christine Moore, New York State Education Department, 89 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12234, (518) 473-8296, email: cmoore@mail.nysed.gov
    Data, views or arguments may be submitted to:
    Peg Rivers, New York State Education Department, 89 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12234, (518) 408-1189, email: privers@mail.nysed.gov
    Public comment will be received until:
    45 days after publication of this notice.
    Regulatory Impact Statement
    1. STATUTORY AUTHORITY:
    Section 207 of the Education Law grants general rule making authority to the Board of Regents to carry into effect the laws and policies of the State relating to education.
    Section 3001 of the Education Law provides that no teacher shall be authorized to teach in the public schools of the State if they are not in possession of a teacher's certificate issued by the Department.
    Subdivision (1) of section 3004 of the Education Law authorizes the Commissioner to prescribe, subject to the approval by the Regents, regulations governing the examination and certification of teachers employed in the public schools of the State.
    2. LEGISLATIVE OBJECTIVES:
    The proposed amendment carries out the legislative objectives of the above- referenced statutes by providing flexibility from the current teacher certification requirements to allow school districts and BOCES to reassign effective classroom teachers to teach students at different grade levels if it would provide for a more efficient operation of the school district or BOCES.
    3. NEEDS AND BENEFITS:
    In 2010, the Board of Regents adopted an amendment to section 80-4.3 of the Commissioner's regulations to provide school districts and BOCES with flexibility in certification when there was a demonstrated immediate fiscal crisis and the certification flexibility would avoid a reduction in force. In 2010, the Regents created certification flexibility in the following areas:
    Grades 7-12 Academic Area Certification Extended to Grades 5 and 6
    The 2010 amendment allows a district or BOCES to reassign a teacher who is employed by a school district and BOCES and certified in the classroom teaching service in a subject area in grades 7-12 to teach that same subject area in grades 5 or 6 through a limited extension to the teacher's existing certificate. The limited extension will be valid for two years and shall be valid with that employing entity only. A full extension may be issued to the candidate if the candidate meets the requirements within those two years.
    Childhood Education Extended to Grades 7 and 8
    The 2010 amendment also authorizes a certified and qualified elementary school teacher (grades 1-6) to be reassigned to a position teaching an academic subject in grades 7 and 8. The teacher would need to have appropriate education and experience for such teaching assignment as demonstrated by earning Highly Qualified status under NCLB in order to be granted a limited extension to their existing certificate title. Also, the teacher must agree to: 1) successfully complete the Content Specialty Test in that subject area, and 2) complete 6 semester hours of course work in Middle Childhood Education, within the next two years to qualify for the full certificate extension when their limited extension expires.
    The Limited extensions certificates for teacher certification flexibility would not be renewable and would expire at the end of the two-year period. It is intended that these Limited Extensions would provide a two-year bridge to authorize teaching for an already experienced teacher who is seeking to complete any remaining requirements to qualify for the full certificate extension in the new teaching assignment.
    Currently, school districts and BOCES may only use this certification flexibility if they can demonstrate an immediate fiscal crisis and that such certification flexibility would avoid a reduction in force. The current regulation also sunsets in June 2013. The proposed amendment would create additional flexibility in the assignment of teachers to these grade levels. The proposed amendment eliminates the requirement that districts or BOCES demonstrate an immediate fiscal crisis or a reduction in force. The employing entity would only need to demonstrate that the certification flexibility would provide for a more efficient operation of the school district or BOCES. The proposed amendment also eliminates the sunset provision.
    The proposed amendment addresses certification issues only. Hiring decisions or appointments to tenure areas continue to be governed by existing law and rules. For example, if, due to a previous reduction in force, a preferred eligibility list exists that covers the tenure area where the district seeks to fill a position, the school district must use the preferred eligibility list first before making any new appointments to that tenure area. Also, any reassignments to a new tenure area require the consent of the teacher and result in the teacher serving a probationary period in the new tenure area.
    4. COSTS:
    (a) Costs to State government: The proposed amendment will not impose any additional costs on State government, including the State Education Department.
    (b) Costs to local governments: The proposed amendment will not impose any additional costs on local governments, including school districts and BOCES.
    (c) Costs to private regulated parties: In general, the proposed amendment does not impose any additional compliance costs on school districts and BOCES. However, in order to obtain an extension under the proposed amendment, the cost of the certificate will be $100 per candidate, which is the amount currently required for candidates seeking a certificate.
    (d) Costs to regulating agency for implementing and continued administration of the rule: As stated above in "Costs to State Government," the amendment will not impose any additional costs on the State Education Department.
    5. LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANDATES:
    The proposed amendment applies to both school districts and boards of cooperative educational services. Therefore, the mandates in Section 3 apply to school districts and BOCES.
    6. PAPERWORK:
    The proposed amendment requires the candidate to submit a written certification from the Chancellor, the superintendent or by the chief school officer containing certain information, when applying for an extension under the proposed amendment.
    7. DUPLICATION:
    The amendment does not duplicate any existing State or Federal requirements.
    8. ALTERNATIVES:
    No alternatives were considered.
    9. FEDERAL STANDARDS:
    There are no Federal standards that establish certification requirements for teachers, except the No Child Left Behind Act. The proposed amendment is consistent with federal standards.
    10. COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE:
    The proposed amendment will become effective on its stated effective date. No additional time is needed to comply.
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
    (a) Small businesses:
    The purpose of the proposed amendment is to provide teacher certification flexibility to provide for a more efficient operation of a school district or BOCES by allowing school districts and BOCES to reassign effective classroom teachers to teach students at different grade levels to avoid reductions in force. Because it is evident from the nature of the proposed amendment that it does not affect small businesses, no further measures were needed to ascertain that fact and none were taken. Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility analysis for small businesses is not required and one has not been prepared.
    (b) Local governments:
    The proposed amendment relates to flexibility in teacher certification requirements for teachers across the State.
    1. EFFECT OF RULE:
    The purpose of the proposed amendment is to provide teacher certification flexibility to provide for a more efficient operation of a school district or BOCES by allowing school districts and BOCES to reassign effective classroom teachers to teach students at different grade levels to avoid reductions in force.
    2. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS:
    In 2010, the Board of Regents adopted an amendment to section 80-4.3 of the Commissioner's regulations to provide school districts and BOCES with flexibility in certification when there was a demonstrated immediate fiscal crisis and the certification flexibility would avoid a reduction in force. In 2010, the Regents created certification flexibility in the following areas:
    Grades 7-12 Academic Area Certification Extended to Grades 5 and 6
    The 2010 amendment allows a district or BOCES to reassign a teacher who is employed by a school district and BOCES and certified in the classroom teaching service in a subject area in grades 7-12 to teach that same subject area in grades 5 or 6 through a limited extension to the teacher's existing certificate. The limited extension will be valid for two years and shall be valid with that employing entity only. A full extension may be issued to the candidate if the candidate meets the requirements within those two years.
    Childhood Education Extended to Grades 7 and 8
    The 2010 amendment also authorizes a certified and qualified elementary school teacher (grades 1-6) to be reassigned to a position teaching an academic subject in grades 7 and 8. The teacher would need to have appropriate education and experience for such teaching assignment as demonstrated by earning Highly Qualified status under NCLB in order to be granted a limited extension to their existing certificate title. Also, the teacher must agree to: 1) successfully complete the Content Specialty Test in that subject area, and 2) complete 6 semester hours of course work in Middle Childhood Education, within the next two years to qualify for the full certificate extension when their limited extension expires.
    The Limited extensions certificates for teacher certification flexibility would not be renewable and would expire at the end of the two-year period. It is intended that these Limited Extensions would provide a two-year bridge to authorize teaching for an already experienced teacher who is seeking to complete any remaining requirements to qualify for the full certificate extension in the new teaching assignment.
    Currently, school districts and BOCES may only use this certification flexibility if they can demonstrate an immediate fiscal crisis and that such certification flexibility would avoid a reduction in force. The current regulation also sunsets in June 2013. The proposed amendment would create additional flexibility in the assignment of teachers to these grade levels. The proposed amendment eliminates the requirement that districts or BOCES demonstrate an immediate fiscal crisis or a reduction in force. The employing entity would only need to demonstrate that the certification flexibility would provide for a more efficient operation of the school district or BOCES. The proposed amendment also eliminates the sunset provision.
    The proposed amendment addresses certification issues only. Hiring decisions or appointments to tenure areas continue to be governed by existing law and rules. For example, if, due to a previous reduction in force, a preferred eligibility list exists that covers the tenure area where the district seeks to fill a position, the school district must use the preferred eligibility list first before making any new appointments to that tenure area. Also, any reassignments to a new tenure area require the consent of the teacher and result in the teacher serving a probationary period in the new tenure area.
    3. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:
    The proposed amendment does not mandate that school districts or BOCES contract for additional professional services to comply.
    4. COMPLIANCE COSTS:
    The proposed amendment is permissive in nature and any costs associated with the proposed amendment only apply to candidates that wish to be reassigned to a new grade level. However, to obtain a limited extension, the cost of the extension will be $100 per candidate, which is the amount currently required for candidates seeking an extension.
    5. ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL FEASIBILITY:
    The proposed amendment does not impose any additional technological requirements. Economic feasibility is addressed under the Compliance Costs section above.
    6. MINIMIZING ADVERSE IMPACT:
    The proposed amendment provides flexibility to school districts and BOCES across the State. The proposed amendment provides flexibility from the current teacher certification requirements to allow school districts and BOCES to reassign effective classroom teachers to teach students at different grade levels if it would provide for a more efficient operation of the school district or BOCES.
    7. LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATION:
    Comments on the proposed rule were solicited from the State Professional Standards and Practices Board for Teaching. This is an advisory group to the Board of Regents and the Commissioner of Education on matters pertaining to teacher education, certification, and practice. The Board has representatives of school districts and BOCES across the State.
    Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
    1. TYPES AND ESTIMATE OF THE NUMBER OF RURAL AREAS:
    The proposed amendment will affect teachers in school districts and boards of cooperative services in all areas of New York State, including the 44 rural counties with fewer than 200,000 inhabitants and the 71 towns and urban counties with a population density of 150 square miles or less.
    2. REPORTING, RECORDKEEPING, AND OTHER COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:
    In 2010, the Board of Regents adopted an amendment to section 80-4.3 of the Commissioner's regulations to provide school districts and BOCES with flexibility in certification when there was a demonstrated immediate fiscal crisis and the certification flexibility would avoid a reduction in force. In 2010, the Regents created certification flexibility in the following areas:
    Grades 7-12 Academic Area Certification Extended to Grades 5 and 6
    The 2010 amendment allows a district or BOCES to reassign a teacher who is employed by a school district and BOCES and certified in the classroom teaching service in a subject area in grades 7-12 to teach that same subject area in grades 5 or 6 through a limited extension to the teacher's existing certificate. The limited extension will be valid for two years and shall be valid with that employing entity only. A full extension may be issued to the candidate if the candidate meets the requirements within those two years.
    Childhood Education Extended to Grades 7 and 8
    The 2010 amendment also authorizes a certified and qualified elementary school teacher (grades 1-6) to be reassigned to a position teaching an academic subject in grades 7 and 8. The teacher would need to have appropriate education and experience for such teaching assignment as demonstrated by earning Highly Qualified status under NCLB in order to be granted a limited extension to their existing certificate title. Also, the teacher must agree to: 1) successfully complete the Content Specialty Test in that subject area, and 2) complete 6 semester hours of course work in Middle Childhood Education, within the next two years to qualify for the full certificate extension when their limited extension expires.
    The Limited extensions certificates for teacher certification flexibility would not be renewable and would expire at the end of the two-year period. It is intended that these Limited Extensions would provide a two-year bridge to authorize teaching for an already experienced teacher who is seeking to complete any remaining requirements to qualify for the full certificate extension in the new teaching assignment.
    Currently, school districts and BOCES may only use this certification flexibility if they can demonstrate an immediate fiscal crisis and that such certification flexibility would avoid a reduction in force. The current regulation also sunsets in June 2013. The proposed amendment would create additional flexibility in the assignment of teachers to these grade levels. The proposed amendment eliminates the requirement that districts or BOCES demonstrate an immediate fiscal crisis or a reduction in force. The employing entity would only need to demonstrate that the certification flexibility would provide for a more efficient operation of the school district or BOCES. The proposed amendment also eliminates the sunset provision.
    The proposed amendment addresses certification issues only. Hiring decisions or appointments to tenure areas continue to be governed by existing law and rules. For example, if, due to a previous reduction in force, a preferred eligibility list exists that covers the tenure area where the district seeks to fill a position, the school district must use the preferred eligibility list first before making any new appointments to that tenure area. Also, any reassignments to a new tenure area require the consent of the teacher and result in the teacher serving a probationary period in the new tenure area.
    3. COSTS:
    The proposed amendment is permissive in nature and any costs associated with the proposed amendment only apply to candidates that wish to be reassigned to a new grade level. However, to obtain a limited extension under the proposed amendment, the cost of the certificate will be $100 per candidate, which is the amount currently required for candidates seeking an extension.
    4. MINIMIZING ADVERSE IMPACT:
    The proposed amendment provides flexibility to school districts and BOCES located across the State. The proposed amendment provides flexibility from the current teacher certification requirements to allow school districts and BOCES to reassign effective classroom teachers to teach students at different grade levels to provide for a more efficient operation of the school district or BOCES.
    5. RURAL AREA PARTICIPATION:
    Comments on the proposed rule were solicited from the State Professional Standards and Practices Board for Teaching. This is an advisory group to the Board of Regents and the Commissioner of Education on matters pertaining to teacher education, certification, and practice. The Board has representatives of school districts and BOCES located in rural areas of New York State.
    Job Impact Statement
    The purpose of the proposed amendment is to provide teacher certification flexibility to provide for a more efficient operation of a school district or BOCES. The proposed amendment will have no impact on the number of jobs or employment opportunities in New York State. Accordingly, a job impact statement is not required and one has not been prepared.

Document Information