9/26/07 N.Y. St. Reg. PSC-39-07-00020-P
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following proposed rule:
Proposed action:
The Public Service Commission is considering whether to accept, reject or to modify, in whole or in part, a proposal by Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RG&E) to revise the procedures the utility uses to estimate customer gas and/or electric usage for the purpose of rendering bills to nonresidential electric or gas heating customers when an actual reading of metered usage data for the customers is not available.
Statutory authority:
Public Service Law, section 39
Subject:
RG&E's procedures for estimating customer usage for the purpose of rendering billed charges.
Purpose:
To modify the procedure for estimating customer usage in instances when metered usage data is not available.
Substance of proposed rule:
The New York State Public Service Commission is considering whether to accept, reject or to modify, in whole or in part, a proposal of Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation to revise the method the utility uses to estimate customer gas and/or electric usage for the purpose of rendering bills to nonresidential electric or gas heating customers when actual metered usage data is not available.
Text of proposed rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained by filing a Document Request Form (F-96) located on our website http://www.dps.state.ny.us/f96dir.htm. For questions, contact:
Central Operations, Public Service Commission, Bldg. 3, Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12223-1350, (518) 474-2500
Data, views or arguments may be submitted to:
Jaclyn A. Brilling, Secretary, Public Service Commission, Bldg. 3, Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12223-1350, (518) 474-6530
Public comment will be received until:
45 days after publication of this notice.
Regulatory Impact Statement, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Rural Area Flexibility Analysis and Job Impact Statement
Statements and analyses are not submitted with this notice because the proposed rule is within the definition contained in section 102(2)(a)(ii) of the State Administrative Procedure Act.
