MRD-28-09-00014-E Appeals Process Pursuant to Chapter 508, Laws of 2008

9/30/09 N.Y. St. Reg. MRD-28-09-00014-E

NEW YORK STATE REGISTER

VOLUME XXXI, ISSUE 39

September 30, 2009

RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES

OFFICE OF MENTAL RETARDATION AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES

EMERGENCY RULE MAKING

 

I.D No. MRD-28-09-00014-E

Filing No. 1072

Filing Date. Sept. 11, 2009

Effective Date. Sept. 12, 2009

Appeals Process Pursuant to Chapter 508, Laws of 2008

PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:

Action taken:

Addition of Part 630 to Title 14 NYCRR.

Statutory authority:

Mental Hygiene Law, sections 13.09(b) and 13.37

Finding of necessity for emergency rule:

Preservation of public health, public safety and general welfare.

Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity:

The appeals process may allow for persons who were determined incorrectly not to need OMRDD services, to actually be determined to be eligible for services upon appeal. The person will then receive the necessary services.

Subject:

Appeals process pursuant to Chapter 508, Laws of 2008.

Purpose:

To establish an appeals process to use when a person is determined not to be in need of OMRDD adult services.

Text of emergency rule:

Add a new Part 630 to 14 NYCRR as follows:

PART 630

ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATIONS FOR CHILDREN WHO ARE AGING OUT

Section 630.1 Applicability.

This Part applies to the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (OMRDD) and its local administrative offices, the Developmental Disabilities Services Offices (DDSOs). It does not apply to voluntary agencies or private providers of services.

Section 630.2 Background.

(a) Subparagraph 4402(1)(b)(5) of the New York State Education Law and subdivision 398(13) of the New York State Social Services Law require that the committee on special education, multidisciplinary team or social services official send a report to OMRDD (if certain conditions are met) about a child who will be aging out and who may need adult services in the OMRDD system. A person ages out when he or she is no longer able to receive services in the educational system, foster care system or other system for children because of his or her age (usually related to the person attaining 21 years of age).

(b) Section 13.37 of the New York State Mental Hygiene Law sets forth the responsibilities of OMRDD related to the planning and referral process for children who are aging out.

(1) Once a report about the child has been received by OMRDD, OMRDD is charged with reviewing the report to determine whether the child will likely need adult services, including evaluating the child if necessary.

(2) If OMRDD determines that the child will not require adult services, OMRDD is required to notify the child's parent or guardian and referring entity. Chapter 508 of the Laws of 2008 amended Section 13.37 MHL to establish that if this determination is not acceptable to the child's parent or guardian, he or she may appeal the determination.

(c) Subdivisions 1.03(21) and (22) of the Mental Hygiene Law define "mental retardation" and "developmental disability."

Section 630.3. Determination of eligibility for services in the OMRDD system.

OMRDD shall determine whether individuals meet the criteria established in subdivision 1.03(22) of the Mental Hygiene Law and are therefore eligible to receive services in the OMRDD system. OMRDD determinations shall be in accordance with the eligibility determination process described in "Eligibility for OMRDD Services" which is inserted into this Part in section 630.5.

Section 630.4. Procedures for children aging out.

(a) For the purposes of meeting the requirements of Section 13.37 MHL, a child is determined to "likely need adult services" if the child is eligible for services in the OMRDD system.

(b) Upon receiving a report submitted pursuant to subparagraph 4402(1)(b)(5) of the Education Law or subdivision 398(13) of the Social Services Law, OMRDD shall determine whether the child is eligible for services utilizing the eligibility determination process described in "Eligibility for OMRDD Services."

(c) If OMRDD determines that the child is not eligible for services, it shall notify the child's parent or guardian and the committee on special education, multidisciplinary team or social services official which submitted the report.

(1) Such notice shall state the reasons for the determination and may recommend a state agency which may be responsible for determining and recommending adult services.

(2) If the determination is not acceptable to the child's parent or guardian, he or she may appeal the determination in accordance with the eligibility determination process described in "Eligibility for OMRDD Services." The notice to the parent or guardian shall also describe the procedures for appealing the determination.

Section 630.5. "Eligibility for OMRDD Services."

The following policy of OMRDD entitled "Eligibility for OMRDD Services" is hereby inserted into this Part.

This notice is intended

to serve only as a notice of emergency adoption. This agency intends to adopt the provisions of this emergency rule as a permanent rule, having previously submitted to the Department of State a notice of proposed rule making, I.D. No. MRD-28-09-00014-P, Issue of July 15, 2009. The emergency rule will expire November 9, 2009.

Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:

Barbara Brundage, Director of RAU, Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 44 Holland Avenue, Albany, New York 12229, [phone], email: [e-mail]

Additional matter required by statute:

Pursuant to the requirements of SEQRA and 14 NYCRR Part 602, OMRDD has determined that the action described herein will have no effect on the environment, and an E.I.S is not needed.

Regulatory Impact Statement

1. Statutory Authority:

a. The OMRDD’s authority to adopt rules and regulations necessary and proper to implement any matter under its jurisdiction as stated in the New York State Mental Hygiene Law Section 13.09(b).

b. Section 13.37 of the New York State Mental Hygiene Law establishes OMRDD's responsibilities in relation to the planning and referral of children with developmental disabilities for adult services. The statute requires OMRDD to determine whether a child referred to OMRDD through the planning and referral processes will likely need adult services.

2. Legislative Objectives: The amendments further the legislative objectives embodied in Mental Hygiene Law Section 13.37. Chapter 508 of the Laws of 2008 amended Section 13.37 to establish that if OMRDD determines that a child will not require adult services, and that if the determination is not acceptable to the child's parent or guardian, the parent or guardian "may appeal the determination pursuant to regulations adopted by the commissioner."

3. Needs and Benefits: Section 13.37 of the Mental Hygiene Law (MHL) sets forth OMRDD's responsibility to review referrals from school and social services districts to determine whether a child aging out of those systems is likely to need adult services. These responsibilities date back to 1983 with several subsequent amendments including those added by Chapter 600, Laws of 1994.

Section 13.37 MHL requires that OMRDD provide written notification to the child's parents or guardian, and referring entity, of the reasons for its determination that the child does not need adult services in the OMRDD system. Chapter 508 of the Laws of 2008 adds a requirement to Section 13.37 MHL that the parent or guardian may appeal the determination if it is not acceptable to him or her pursuant to regulations adopted by OMRDD. The addition of new Part 630 of Title 14 NYCRR by this proposed regulation assists in the implementation of the new statutory requirement.

OMRDD has longstanding policy documents which establish a process for determining whether an individual has a developmental disability as defined by the Mental Hygiene Law and is therefore eligible for services in the OMRDD system. The pre-existing OMRDD process already includes procedures that can be utilized to appeal a determination that an individual does not have a developmental disability. A determination by OMRDD that a person does not have a developmental disability according to the legal definition is tantamount to a determination that the child does not require (or need) adult services, which is the standard established by Section 13.37 MHL.

In order to implement the new statute, OMRDD will continue to adhere to the procedures outlined in its longstanding policy documents regarding eligibility for services, which include appeals procedures. The new regulations therefore merely require adherence to these policies.

4. Costs:

a. Costs to the Agency and the State and its local governments: There will be no new costs to OMRDD or the State. OMRDD already has appeals processes pursuant to longstanding agency procedures regarding eligibility for services, which include appeals processes.

There will be no new costs to local governments as a result of the proposed amendments.

b. Costs to private regulated parties: There will be no new costs to private regulated parties.

5. Local Government Mandates: There are no new mandates on local governmental units or any other special districts.

6. Paperwork: There will no new paperwork for private regulated parties or local government. There will be no new paperwork for OMRDD as it will merely continue to adhere to its longstanding procedures regarding eligibility for services.

7. Duplication: None.

8. Alternatives: OMRDD considered using general references in the regulations in lieu of including the actual text of its procedures for determining eligibility. However, OMRDD decided that it would be more valuable and clearer to regulated parties to include the existing eligibility determination process in the actual regulatory text.

9. Federal Standards: The proposed amendments do not exceed any minimum standards of the Federal government.

10. Compliance Schedule: OMRDD will continue to adhere to its longstanding policies regarding eligibility. Further, compliance was required by emergency regulations effective January 14, 2009, April 15, and July 14, 2009. No new compliance activities are necessary.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

1. Effect on small businesses: These amendments apply only to OMRDD and do not apply to small businesses that operate under the auspices of OMRDD.

The amendments result in no new costs for local government.

2. Compliance requirements: OMRDD will continue to adhere to its longstanding policies regarding eligibility, which include procedures to appeal a determination that a person is not eligible for services in the OMRDD system. The amendments contain no compliance requirements for small businesses or local governments.

3. Professional services: No additional professional services are required as a result of these amendments. The amendments will have no impact on the professional service needs of small businesses or local governments.

4. Compliance costs: There are no costs to local governments or to small businesses.

5. Economic and technology feasibility: The amendments do not impose on regulated parties the use of any technological processes.

6. Minimizing adverse economic impact: These amendments impose no adverse economic impact on local governments or small businesses.

7. Small business and local government participation: Providers, individuals receiving services and family members were involved in the original development of OMRDD's longstanding policies and procedures regarding eligibility for services and have been familiar with the processes for years, including the appeals procedures. OMRDD also notified all providers about the promulgation of previous emergency regulations which contained the same provisions.

Rural Area Flexibility Analysis

A Rural Area Flexibility Analysis for the proposed amendments has not been submitted. OMRDD has determined that the amendments will not impose any adverse impact, reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements on public or private entities in rural areas. The amendments concern procedures for appealing a determination that a person aging out does not need services in the OMRDD system. No compliance activities are imposed on providers.

Job Impact Statement

A Job Impact Statement is not submitted because the amendment will not present an adverse impact on existing jobs or employment opportunities. The amendments concern procedures for appealing a determination that a person aging out does not need services in the OMRDD system. No compliance activities are imposed on providers and no new procedures will be utilized by OMRDD. OMRDD will continue to adhere to its longstanding policies and procedures related to determining eligibility for services in the OMRDD system.

Assessment of Public Comment

The agency received no public comment since publication of the last assessment of public comment.