Home » 2007 Issues » December 26, 2007 » DOS-39-07-00010-E Administration and Enforcement of the Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code (UFPBC) with Respect to Facilities to be Included in the Statewide Wireless Network
DOS-39-07-00010-E Administration and Enforcement of the Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code (UFPBC) with Respect to Facilities to be Included in the Statewide Wireless Network
12/26/07 N.Y. St. Reg. DOS-39-07-00010-E
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XXIX, ISSUE 52
December 26, 2007
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
EMERGENCY RULE MAKING
I.D No. DOS-39-07-00010-E
Filing No. 1359
Filing Date. Dec. 06, 2007
Effective Date. Dec. 06, 2007
Administration and Enforcement of the Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code (UFPBC) with Respect to Facilities to be Included in the Statewide Wireless Network
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
Action taken:
Amendment of sections 1201.2(d) and 1204.1; addition of section 1204.3(f)(4) and (h)(3); renumbering of section 1204.3(i) to section 1204.3(l); and addition of section 1204.3(i), (j) and (k) to Title 19 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
Executive Law, section 381
Finding of necessity for emergency rule:
Preservation of public safety and general welfare.
Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity:
This rule is adopted as an emergency measure to preserve the public safety and general welfare and because time is of the essence. This rule clarifies an existing rule, which provides that the State is accountable for administration and enforcement of the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code (the “Uniform Code”) with respect to buildings, premises and equipment in the custody of, or activities related thereto undertaken by, a State department, bureau, commission, board or authority, by expressly providing that the State will be responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to facilities to be included in the Statewide Wireless Network to be established and implemented by the Office for Technology. Adoption of this rule on an emergency basis preserves the public safety and general welfare by clarifying the responsibility for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to the Statewide Wireless Network, and thereby permitting the immediate commencement of the review and permitting process incidental to the construction and implementation of the Statewide Wireless Network.
Subject:
Accountability for the administration and enforcement of the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code with respect to facilities to be included in the Statewide Wireless Network.
Purpose:
To clarify that the State will be responsible for the administration and enforcement of the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code with respect to facilities to be included in the Statewide Wireless Network.
Text of emergency rule:
Subdivision (d) of section 1201.2 of Title 19 NYCRR is amended to read as follows:
(d) (1) The State shall be accountable for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to buildings, premises and equipment in the custody of, or activities related thereto undertaken by, a State department, bureau, commission, board or authority.
(2) Without limiting the generality of the provisions of paragraph (1) of this subdivision, the State shall be accountable for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to all statewide wireless network facilities (as that term is defined in subdivision (j) of section 1204.3 of Part 1204 of this Title) and all activities related thereto undertaken by the Office for Technology; provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as subjecting to the provisions of the Uniform Code any statewide wireless network facility that would not otherwise be subject to the provisions of the Uniform Code.
(3) In the case of a statewide wireless network facility (as that term is defined in subdivision (j) of section 1204.3 of Part 1204 of this Title) which is constructed or installed on or in a statewide wireless network supporting building (as that term is defined in subdivision (k) of section 1204.3 of Part 1204 of this Title):
(i) the State shall be accountable for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to such statewide wireless network facility and all activities related thereto undertaken by the Office for Technology, but the State shall not be accountable for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to such statewide wireless network supporting building;
(ii) the governmental entity that would have been accountable for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to such statewide wireless network supporting building if such statewide wireless network facility had not been constructed or installed thereon or therein shall remain accountable for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to such statewide wireless network supporting building, but such governmental entity shall not be responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to such statewide wireless network facility; and
(iii) the State and such governmental entity shall consult with each other and fully cooperate with each other in connection with the performance of their respective administrative and enforcement obligations, and in particular, but not by way of limitation, the State shall make all records in its possession pertaining to such statewide wireless network facility available to such governmental entity upon request by such governmental entity, and such governmental entity shall make all records in its possession pertaining to such statewide wireless network supporting building available to the State upon request by the State. Nothing in this paragraph shall require the State to make available any record which, if disclosed, would jeopardize the capacity of the State, the Office for Technology, or any other State agency (as that term is defined in subdivision (h) of section 1204.3 of Part 1204 of this Part) to guarantee the security of its information technology assets, such assets encompassing both electronic information systems and infrastructures, or if access to such record could otherwise be denied under section 87 of the Public Officers Law.
Section 1204.1 Title 19 NYCRR is amended to read as follows:
Section 1204.1 Introduction. Section 381 of the Executive Law directs the Secretary of State to promulgate rules and regulations prescribing minimum standards for administration and enforcement of the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code (Uniform Code). Section 1201.2(d) of this Title provides that the State shall be accountable for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to:
(a) buildings, premises, and equipment in the custody of, or activities related thereto undertaken by, a State agency, and
(b) all statewide wireless network facilities and all activities related thereto undertaken by the Office for Technology.
This Part establishes procedures for the administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code by state agencies. Buildings and structures exempted from the Uniform Code by other preclusive statutes or regulations are not subject to the requirements of this Part.
New paragraph (4) of subdivision (f) of section 1204.3 of Title 19 NYCRR is added to read as follows:
(4) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subdivision to the contrary and without regard to the criteria mentioned in paragraph (3) of this subdivision, for the purposes of this Part the Office for Technology shall be considered to have custody and effective control of all statewide wireless network facilities; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be construed as subjecting to the provisions of the Code any statewide wireless network facility that would not otherwise be subject to the provisions of the Code; and provided further that for the purposes of this Part, the Office for Technology shall not be considered to have custody or effective control of any statewide wireless network supporting building merely by reason of the construction or installation of any statewide wireless network facility thereon or therein.
New paragraph (3) of subdivision (h) of section 1204.3 of Title 19 of the NYCRR is added to read as follows:
(3) Without limiting the generality of paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subdivision, for the purposes of this Part and for the purposes of Part 1201 of this Title, the term “State agency” shall include the Office for Technology.
Subdivision (i) of section 1204.3 of Title 19 NYCRR is renumbered subdivision (l) and new subdivisions (i), (j), and (k) are added to read as follows:
(i) Statewide wireless network. An integrated statewide communications system intended to link state and local first responders to each other and to allow state and local first responders to communicate reliably during emergency situations, as contemplated by section 402(1)(a) of the State Technology Law. The term statewide wireless network shall include such communications system as originally developed and constructed and as thereafter extended, improved, upgraded, or otherwise modified from time to time.
(j) Statewide wireless network facility. Any tower, antenna, or equipment which is used or intended to be used in the operation of the statewide wireless network, and any building or structure which is constructed specifically for the purpose of supporting or containing any such tower, antenna, or equipment.
(k) Statewide wireless network supporting building. A building or structure which is not a statewide wireless network facility (i.e., which was not constructed specifically for the purpose of supporting or containing a tower, antenna, or equipment which is used or intended to be used in the operation of the statewide wireless network), but which has a statewide wireless network facility constructed or installed thereon or therein. For example, if a tower, antenna, and equipment used or intended to be used in the operation of the statewide wireless network, and a building or structure which will contain such equipment or support such tower, are constructed on the top of an existing office building, then:
(1) such office building would be a statewide wireless network supporting building;
(2) such office building would not be a statewide wireless network facility; and
(3) the tower, antenna, equipment, and building or structure constructed on the top of such office building would be a statewide wireless network facility.
This notice is intended
to serve only as a notice of emergency adoption. This agency intends to adopt the provisions of this emergency rule as a permanent rule, having previously published a notice of emergency/proposed rule making, I.D. No. DOS-39-07-00010-EP, Issue of September 26, 2007. The emergency rule will expire February 3, 2008.
Text of emergency rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
Joseph Ball, Department of State, 41 State St., Albany, NY 12231, (518) 474-6740, e-mail: joseph.ball@dos.state.ny.us
Regulatory Impact Statement
1. STATUTORY AUTHORITY.
The statutory authority for this rule is section Executive Law section 381(1), which provides that the Secretary of State shall promulgate rules and regulations prescribing minimum standards for administration and enforcement of the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code (the “Uniform Code”), and Executive Law section 381(2), which provides that every local government shall administer and enforce the Uniform Code “(e)xcept as may be provided in regulations of the secretary ….”
2. LEGISLATIVE OBJECTIVES.
“In general, section 381 of the Executive Law directs that the State's cities, towns and villages administer and enforce the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code (Uniform Code). However, the statute contemplates the need for alternative procedures for certain classes of buildings based upon their design, construction, ownership, occupancy or use, and authorizes the Secretary of State to establish those procedures ….” 19 NYCRR section 1201.1.
Rules and regulations previously adopted by the Secretary of State pursuant to Executive Law section 381(2) provide that the State shall be accountable for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to buildings, premises and equipment in the custody of, or activities related thereto undertaken by, a State department, bureau, commission, board or authority.
This rule will clarify that the State is accountable for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to facilities in the Statewide Wireless Network to be constructed and implemented by the Office for Technology.
3. NEEDS AND BENEFITS.
The existing policy of this State, as reflected in the existing rules and regulations, is that the State shall be accountable for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to buildings, premises and equipment in the custody of, or activities related thereto undertaken by, a State department, bureau, commission, board or authority. This rule will clarify that this policy shall apply to facilities in the Statewide Wireless Network to be constructed and implemented by the Office for Technology.
This rule will also address the situation that will arise when a governmental agency other than the State (a local government, in most cases) is responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to a particular building or structure, and a Statewide Wireless Network facility is to be constructed or installed in or on such building or structure. This rule will provide that in such a case: (1) the local government will continue to have responsibility for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to the building or structure; (2) the State will be responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to the Statewide Wireless Network facility to be constructed on installed in or on the building or structure; and (3) the local government and the State must consult and cooperate with each other with respect to their respective administrative and enforcement responsibilities, and must make their records available to each other on request. The rule would provide that the State would not be required to make available any record which, if disclosed, would jeopardize the capacity of the State, the Office for Technology, or any other State agency to guarantee the security of its information technology assets, such assets encompassing both electronic information systems and infrastructures, or if access to such record could otherwise be denied under section 87 of the Public Officers Law.
It is appropriate that the State have the responsibility for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to the facilities that will be part of the Statewide Wireless Network. This will simplify and streamline the permitting process for all Statewide Wireless Network facilities to be constructed throughout the State. However, it may not be clear that the Office for Technology is a “department, bureau, commission, board or authority,” as that phrase is currently used in 19 NYCRR section 1201.2(d), and it may not be clear that all facilities in the Statewide Wireless Network will be in the “custody” of the Office for Technology, as that term is currently used in 19 NYCRR section 1201.2(d). Since Statewide Wireless Network facilities will be constructed in numerous communities throughout the State, it is appropriate to provide those communities, as well as the Office for Technology, with a clear indication of the responsibility for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to the Statewide Wireless Network facilities.
4. COSTS.
a. Cost to regulated parties for the implementation of and continuing compliance with this rule: This rule imposes no obligation on any private party.
b. Costs to the Department of State: The Department of State anticipates that it will incur no costs as a result of this rule.
c. Costs to other State agencies: This rule will clarify that the State will be responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to Statewide Wireless Network facilities. The Department of State anticipates that the Office of General Services (“OGS”) will be the construction-permitting agency for Statewide Wireless Network facilities. The Department of State views this aspect of this rule more as a clarification of existing rules and regulations, rather than the creation of a new obligation that OGS would not otherwise have.
The Office for Technology will be required to comply with the Uniform Code in constructing any Statewide Wireless Network facility that is subject to the Uniform Code. However, this obligation exists under existing law and regulation, and not by reason of this rule.
d. Cost to local governments: This rule will require local governments having the responsibility for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to buildings and structures to consult and cooperate with the State, and to make their records available to the State, when a Statewide Wireless Network facility is constructed or installed in or on any such building or structure. However, the Department of State anticipates that existing staff in the code enforcement offices of the affected local governments will be able to provide the required consultation and cooperation, and the Department of State anticipates that this part of this rule will impose little or no new costs on local governments.
5. PAPERWORK.
This rule will clarify that the State, rather than local governments, will be responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to Statewide Wireless Network facilities. The Department of State anticipates that the amount of paperwork that will be required if the State is responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code will be no greater than the paperwork that would be required if local governments were given that responsibility.
6. LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANDATES.
As stated in subparagraph 4 (d) (Costs to local governments) of this Regulatory Impact Statement, this rule will require local governments having the responsibility for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to buildings and structures to consult and cooperate with the State, and to make their records available to the State, when a Statewide Wireless Network facility is constructed or installed in or on any such building or structure. However, the Department of State anticipates that existing staff in the code enforcement offices of the affected local governments will be able to provide the required consultation and cooperation.
7. DUPLICATION.
The Department of State is not aware of any relevant rule or other legal requirement of the State or Federal government which duplicates, overlaps or conflicts with this rule.
8. ALTERNATIVES.
Making local governments, and not the State, responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to Statewide Wireless Network facilities was considered but rejected for the reasons set forth in the Regulatory Impact Statement. The Department of State has not considered any other alternative to this rule.
9. FEDERAL STANDARDS.
The Department of State is not aware of any instance in which this rule exceeds any minimum standards of the federal government for the same or similar subject areas.
10. COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE.
This rule can be complied with immediately. The Office of General Services has the ability to act as the construction-permitting agency, and should be able to begin the required permitting process with little or no delay.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
1. EFFECT OF RULE.
This rule does not apply directly to any business. However, to the extent that any business becomes involved in the Uniform Code permitting process incidental to construction of any Statewide Wireless Network facility, such business will be indirectly affected by this rule, since this rule will provide that the State will be responsible for such permitting.
This rule will affect local governments in municipalities in which Statewide Wireless Network facilities are to be constructed, since this rule will clarify that the State, and not the local government, will be responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to such Statewide Wireless Network facilities.
This rule will provide that when a local government is responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to a particular building or structure and a Statewide Wireless Network facility is constructed or installed in or on such building or structure, (1) the local government will retain the responsibility for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to the building or structure, (2) the State will have responsibility for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to the Statewide Wireless Network facility constructed on installed in or on such building or structure, and (3) the local government and the State will be required to consult and cooperate with each other in connection with the performance of their respective administrative and enforcement obligations, and to make records available to each other upon request. (The rule will provide that the State would not be required to make available any record which, if disclosed, would jeopardize the capacity of the State, the Office for Technology, or any other State agency to guarantee the security of its information technology assets, such assets encompassing both electronic information systems and infrastructures, or if access to such record could otherwise be denied under section 87 of the Public Officers Law.)
2. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS.
Any business involved in the construction of any Statewide Wireless Network facility will be required to comply with the Uniform Code (to the extent that the Uniform Code applies to such facility). However, that requirement exists under current law, not by reason of this rule. This rule will clarify that the State will be responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to such facility; this rule will not impose any new compliance requirement on any business.
This rule will clarify that the State, and not local governments, will be responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to Statewide Wireless Network facilities. This part of the rule imposes no compliance requirements on local governments. This rule will provide that a local government that is responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to a building or structure shall retain such responsibility even if a Statewide Wireless Network facility is constructed or installed in or on such building or structure. This part of the rule imposes no new compliance requirements on local governments.
This rule will require a local government to consult and cooperate with the State, and to make its records available to the State, when the local government is responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to a particular building or structure and a Statewide Wireless Network facility is constructed or installed in or on such building or structure.
3. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES.
This rule imposes no new compliance requirements on businesses. Therefore this rule creates no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other requirements for business which would require professional services.
A local government will be required to consult and cooperate with the State, and to make its records available to the State, when (1) the local government is responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to a particular building or structure and (2) a Statewide Wireless Network facility is constructed or installed in or on such building or structure. The Department of State anticipates that existing staff in the code enforcement office of the local government will be able to provide the necessary consultation and cooperation. Therefore, except for such professional services as may be provided by existing staff, the Department of State anticipates that local governments will not require professional services to comply with this rule.
4. COMPLIANCE COSTS.
This rule imposes no new compliance requirements on businesses. Therefore this rule creates no new compliance costs for businesses.
This rule requires a local government to consult and cooperate with the State, and to make records available to the State, when (1) the local government is responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to a particular building or structure and (2) a Statewide Wireless Network facility is constructed or installed in or on such building or structure. The Department of State anticipates that existing staff in the code enforcement office of the local government will be able to provide the necessary consultation and cooperation. Therefore, the Department of State anticipates that local governments will incur little or no additional costs in complying with this consultation and cooperation requirement.
5. ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL FEASIBILITY.
The Department of State anticipates that the Office of General Services will serve as the construction-permitting agency in connection with the State's obligation to administer and enforce the Uniform Code with respect to Statewide Wireless Network facilities. The Department of State believes that the permitting process incidental to the construction of a Statewide Wireless Network will be facilitated and simplified if that process is centralized in a single State agency. Therefore, to the extent that any small business becomes involved in the permitting process, this rule should enhance the economic and technological feasibility of compliance with the permitting requirements by such business.
The Department of State anticipates that existing staff in the code enforcement offices of local governments will be able to provide the consultation and cooperation that this rule will require when (1) the local government is responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to a particular building or structure and (2) a Statewide Wireless Network facility is constructed or installed in or on such building or structure. The Department of State anticipates that it will be economically and technologically feasible for local governments to comply with this rule.
6. MINIMIZING ADVERSE IMPACT.
This rule imposes no new obligation on businesses of any size. Accordingly, this rule makes no special provisions for small businesses.
This rule requires a local government to consult and cooperate with the State, and to make records available to the State, when (1) the local government is responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to a particular building or structure and (2) a Statewide Wireless Network facility is constructed or installed in or on such building or structure. Since such consultation and cooperation is essential to proper administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code and, accordingly, essential to public safety, it is not feasible to exempt local governments from this rule. However, the Department of State anticipates that existing staff in the code enforcement offices of local governments will be able to provide the necessary consultation and cooperation, and the Department of State anticipates that local governments will incur little or no additional costs in complying with this consultation and cooperation requirement.
7. SMALL BUSINESS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATION.
The Department of State has solicited comments from the Office for Technology and the Office of General Services.
The Department of State notified interested parties throughout the State of the adoption of the previous emergency rules that were similar to this rule by means of notices published in Building New York, a monthly electronic news bulletin covering topics related to the Uniform Code and the construction industry which is prepared by the Department of State and which is currently distributed to approximately 5,500 subscribers, including local governments, design professionals and others involved in all aspects of the construction industry.
Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
1. TYPES AND ESTIMATED NUMBERS OF RURAL AREAS.
This rule clarifies that the State will be responsible for the administration and enforcement of the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code (the “Uniform Code”) with respect to facilities to be included in the Statewide Wireless Network to be established by the Office for Technology. This rule will apply uniformly throughout the State, including all rural areas of the State.
2. REPORTING, RECORDKEEPING AND OTHER COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS.
This rule creates no new reporting, record keeping, or compliance requirement for any business. In particular, this rule creates no new reporting, record keeping, or compliance requirement for businesses located in rural areas.
Local governments that are responsible for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to a particular building or structure will be required to consult and cooperate with the State, and to make its records available to the State, when a Statewide Wireless Network facility is constructed in or on such building or structure. This requirement will apply to all local governments, including local governments located in rural areas.
3. COSTS.
The Department of State anticipates that this rule will impose no new cost on any business. In particular, the Department of State anticipates that this rule will impose no new cost on businesses located in rural areas.
The Department of State anticipates that local governments, including local governments located in rural areas, will be able to use existing staff in their code enforcement offices to fulfill the consulting and cooperation requirements described in Section 2 (Reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance requirements) of this Rural Area Flexibility Analysis. Therefore, the Department of State anticipates that local governments, including local governments located in rural areas, will incur little or no additional costs in complying with this rule.
4. MINIMIZING ADVERSE IMPACT.
For the reasons discussed in Section 3 (Costs) of this Rural Area Flexibility Analysis, the Department of State anticipates that this rule will have little or no adverse impact on any business or local government. In particular, the Department of State anticipates that this rule will have little or no adverse impact on businesses or local governments located in rural areas. Accordingly, this rule makes no special provisions for regulated parties located in rural areas.
5. RURAL AREA PARTICIPATION.
The Department of State notified interested parties throughout the State of the adoption of the previous emergency rules that were similar to this rule by means of notices published in Building New York, a monthly electronic news bulletin covering topics related to the Uniform Code and the construction industry which is prepared by the Department of State and which is currently distributed to approximately 5,500 subscribers, including local governments, design professionals and others involved in all aspects of the construction industry.
Job Impact Statement
The Department of State has determined that this rule will not have a substantial adverse impact on jobs or employment opportunities.
This rule amends the existing regulation that provides that the State shall be accountable for administration and enforcement of the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code (the Uniform Code) with respect to buildings, premises and equipment in the custody of, or activities related thereto undertaken by, a State department, bureau, commission, board or authority, and adds definitions of new terms. The purpose of this rule is to clarify that the State shall have responsibility for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to facilities to be included in the statewide wireless network to be established by the Office for Technology.
This rule will simply clarify the responsibility for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code with respect to the statewide wireless network. It is anticipated that rule will have no adverse impact on jobs or employment opportunities related to the construction of the statewide wireless network. Rather, by providing that all review and permitting responsibilities will be vested in a single permitting agency, this rule should streamline the construction process, which may have a beneficial impact on jobs and employment opportunities related to the construction of the statewide wireless network.
